Oaklee
#535 for girls in 2025, 565 births · #2,006 for boys in 2025, 75 births
Given to girls 84.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 687 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,576since 1999
Oaklee over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #535 | 565 | #2,006 | 75 |
| 2024 | #515 | 598 | #1,938 | 81 |
| 2023 | #445 | 687 | #1,608 | 108 |
| 2022 | #465 | 682 | #1,504 | 120 |
| 2021 | #487 | 645 | #1,658 | 100 |
| 2020 | #623 | 470 | #1,922 | 76 |
| 2019 | #756 | 371 | #1,790 | 86 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #1,856 | 81 |
| 2017 | #942 | 280 | #2,154 | 63 |
| 2016 | #1,197 | 208 | #2,518 | 50 |
| 2015 | #1,454 | 158 | #2,528 | 49 |
| 2014 | #1,876 | 107 | #2,847 | 41 |
| 2013 | #1,834 | 110 | #3,661 | 28 |
| 2012 | #2,401 | 77 | #4,686 | 20 |
| 2011 | #2,695 | 65 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #3,203 | 51 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2009 | #3,409 | 48 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,840 | 18 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,077 | 16 | — | |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | — | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklee! It came in at #12,688, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1999–2000, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklee is popular in 1999
No state had 5 or more girls named Oaklee in 1999, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Oaklee
- 20 spots since 2024 (#515 → #535)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#623 → #535)
- 919 spots since 2015 (#1,454 → #535)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2017 (#1,197 → #942)
- Biggest drop: 70 spots in 2024 (#445 → #515)
- Debuted 1999
- Peaked 2023 at #445 (687 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,336 girls born in 2023 were named Oaklee (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,845 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 65.4% of all girls named Oaklee (3,647) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | #12,688 (1999) | #12,688 |
| 2000s | 180 | #3,409 (2009) | #8,762 |
| 2010s | 1,743 | #756 (2019) | #1,721 |
| 2020s | 3,647 | #445 (2023) | #512 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oaklee in 1999
Top girls' names in 1999
More about 1999
girls
1,773,823 girls got a published name in 1999; 1 in 295,637 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 25.1% of the 16,947 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #11,385Zosia7
- #11,385Zujey7
- #11,385Zuzanna7
- #12,688Oaklee6
- #12,688Aalia6
- #12,688Aaliyan6
- #12,688Aaniya6
- #14,411Aalijah5
- #14,411Aania5
- #14,411Aanya5
Tied with 1,722 names at #12,688; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.