Oaklyn
- #637 for girls in 2025, 456 births
- #4,396 for boys in 2025, 23 births
- Given to girls 93.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2018 · 630 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,027since 2006
Oaklyn over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #637 | 456 | #4,396 | 23 |
| 2024 | #597 | 506 | #3,335 | 35 |
| 2023 | #579 | 517 | #3,177 | 38 |
| 2022 | #527 | 592 | #2,753 | 47 |
| 2021 | #574 | 528 | #3,121 | 38 |
| 2020 | #561 | 523 | #2,980 | 39 |
| 2019 | #584 | 521 | #3,636 | 30 |
| 2018 | #494 | 630 | #2,472 | 52 |
| 2017 | #676 | 434 | #2,951 | 40 |
| 2016 | #1,425 | 162 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #3,059 | 55 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #3,925 | 38 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | — | |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | — | |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | — | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | — | |
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
2006
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklyn! It came in at #17,168, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2006–2008, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklyn is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Kentucky#154 · 1 in 595
- West Virginia#230 · 1 in 725
- Iowa#258 · 1 in 906
- Ohio#358 · 1 in 1,525
- Kansas#361 · 1 in 1,312
Best ever in a state: #65 in North Dakota, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #154 | 29 | 1 in 595 |
| West Virginia | #230 | 7 | 1 in 725 |
| Iowa | #258 | 13 | 1 in 906 |
| Ohio | #358 | 31 | 1 in 1,525 |
| Kansas | #361 | 9 | 1 in 1,312 |
| Arkansas | #376 | 8 | 1 in 1,324 |
| North Carolina | #381 | 28 | 1 in 1,660 |
| Alabama | #391 | 12 | 1 in 1,527 |
| Nebraska | #396 | 5 | 1 in 1,419 |
| Utah | #408 | 10 | 1 in 1,708 |
| Louisiana | #426 | 10 | 1 in 1,637 |
| Pennsylvania | #428 | 25 | 1 in 1,868 |
| Mississippi | #441 | 6 | 1 in 1,483 |
| Wisconsin | #447 | 11 | 1 in 1,842 |
| Missouri | #480 | 12 | 1 in 2,025 |
| Indiana | #511 | 13 | 1 in 2,147 |
| Georgia | #546 | 20 | 1 in 2,260 |
| Oklahoma | #546 | 7 | 1 in 2,111 |
| Michigan | #553 | 14 | 1 in 2,552 |
| Tennessee | #568 | 13 | 1 in 2,467 |
| South Carolina | #614 | 7 | 1 in 2,613 |
| Illinois | #619 | 15 | 1 in 2,955 |
| Colorado | #634 | 8 | 1 in 2,916 |
| Virginia | #704 | 10 | 1 in 3,374 |
| Minnesota | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,580 |
| Florida | #768 | 21 | 1 in 4,132 |
| Texas | #820 | 36 | 1 in 4,460 |
| Maryland | #840 | 5 | 1 in 3,997 |
| Massachusetts | #873 | 5 | 1 in 4,806 |
| New York | #902 | 17 | 1 in 4,608 |
| New Jersey | #1,036 | 6 | 1 in 5,917 |
| Washington | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 5,772 |
| California | #2,767 | 6 | 1 in 26,954 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklyn
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 76 spots since 2020 (#561 → #637)
- 2,422 spots since 2015 (#3,059 → #637)
- Biggest jump: 749 spots in 2017
- Biggest drop: 90 spots in 2019
Rise & fade · girls
12 yrs to peak
- Debuted 2006
- Peaked 2018 at #494 (630 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 9 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,700
- Highest: 1 in 2,700 girls born in 2018 were named Oaklyn (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,525 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 62.1% of all girls named Oaklyn (3,122) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12 | #13,704 (2009) | #15,436 |
| 2010s | 1,893 | #494 (2018) | #5,098 |
| 2020s | 3,122 | #527 (2022) | #579 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Oaklyn ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: