Oaklyn
#637 for girls in 2025, 456 births · #4,396 for boys in 2025, 23 births
Given to girls 93.1% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2018 · 630 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,027since 2006
Oaklyn over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #637 | 456 | #4,396 | 23 |
| 2024 | #597 | 506 | #3,335 | 35 |
| 2023 | #579 | 517 | #3,177 | 38 |
| 2022 | #527 | 592 | #2,753 | 47 |
| 2021 | #574 | 528 | #3,121 | 38 |
| 2020 | #561 | 523 | #2,980 | 39 |
| 2019 | #584 | 521 | #3,636 | 30 |
| 2018 | #494 | 630 | #2,472 | 52 |
| 2017 | #676 | 434 | #2,951 | 40 |
| 2016 | #1,425 | 162 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #3,059 | 55 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #3,925 | 38 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | — | |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | — | |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | — | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | — | |
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklyn! It came in at #17,168, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2006–2008, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklyn is popular in 2018
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#95 · 1 in 306
- West Virginia#141 · 1 in 469
- Iowa#149 · 1 in 585
- Nebraska#150 · 1 in 535
- Kentucky#172 · 1 in 682
Best ever in a state: #65 in North Dakota, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #95 | 10 | 1 in 306 |
| West Virginia | #141 | 12 | 1 in 469 |
| Iowa | #149 | 21 | 1 in 585 |
| Nebraska | #150 | 14 | 1 in 535 |
| Kentucky | #172 | 26 | 1 in 682 |
| Montana | #191 | 5 | 1 in 546 |
| Tennessee | #198 | 37 | 1 in 843 |
| North Dakota | #203 | 5 | 1 in 596 |
| Oklahoma | #227 | 18 | 1 in 869 |
| Wisconsin | #250 | 22 | 1 in 1,012 |
| Missouri | #254 | 26 | 1 in 1,019 |
| Georgia | #305 | 36 | 1 in 1,285 |
| Indiana | #319 | 22 | 1 in 1,351 |
| Utah | #321 | 13 | 1 in 1,283 |
| Ohio | #322 | 37 | 1 in 1,379 |
| South Carolina | #327 | 14 | 1 in 1,263 |
| Mississippi | #350 | 9 | 1 in 1,195 |
| North Carolina | #350 | 30 | 1 in 1,500 |
| Arkansas | #352 | 9 | 1 in 1,224 |
| Louisiana | #381 | 13 | 1 in 1,507 |
| Pennsylvania | #382 | 30 | 1 in 1,677 |
| Minnesota | #387 | 15 | 1 in 1,566 |
| Kansas | #390 | 8 | 1 in 1,507 |
| Michigan | #409 | 22 | 1 in 1,829 |
| Alabama | #427 | 11 | 1 in 1,701 |
| Virginia | #520 | 15 | 1 in 2,396 |
| Oregon | #542 | 6 | 1 in 2,333 |
| Illinois | #584 | 19 | 1 in 2,817 |
| Arizona | #638 | 10 | 1 in 2,939 |
| Colorado | #675 | 7 | 1 in 3,181 |
| Maryland | #712 | 7 | 1 in 3,336 |
| Texas | #713 | 43 | 1 in 3,696 |
| Florida | #780 | 20 | 1 in 4,254 |
| New York | #1,183 | 12 | 1 in 7,224 |
| California | #2,610 | 7 | 1 in 27,068 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklyn
- 40 spots since 2024 (#597 → #637)
- 76 spots since 2020 (#561 → #637)
- 2,422 spots since 2015 (#3,059 → #637)
- Biggest jump: 749 spots in 2017 (#1,425 → #676)
- Biggest drop: 90 spots in 2019 (#494 → #584)
- Debuted 2006
- Peaked 2018 at #494 (630 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,700 girls born in 2018 were named Oaklyn (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,525 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 62.1% of all girls named Oaklyn (3,122) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12 | #13,704 (2009) | #15,436 |
| 2010s | 1,893 | #494 (2018) | #5,098 |
| 2020s | 3,122 | #527 (2022) | #579 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oaklyn in 2018
Top girls' names in 2018
Top boys' names in 2018
More about 2018
girls
1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 2,700 of them was named Oaklyn, which outranked 97.3% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,816,158 boys got a published name in 2018; 1 in 34,926 of them was named Oaklyn, which outranked 82.5% of the 14,118 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,445Trayvon53
- #2,445Tymir53
- #2,445Yash53
- #2,472Oaklyn52
- #2,472Abubakar52
- #2,472Alston52
- #2,472Ameen52
- #2,507Aasir51
- #2,507Aleksandr51
- #2,507Ayce51
Tied with 34 names at #2,472; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.