Palmer
- #232 for girls in 2025, 1,330 births
- #991 for boys in 2025, 230 births
- Given to girls 50.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,330 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,389since 1908
Palmer over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #232 | 1,330 | #991 | 230 |
| 2024 | #258 | 1,224 | #1,076 | 202 |
| 2023 | #277 | 1,133 | #940 | 240 |
| 2022 | #295 | 1,075 | #1,090 | 200 |
| 2021 | #330 | 996 | #987 | 222 |
| 2020 | #348 | 888 | #1,177 | 163 |
| 2019 | #461 | 675 | #1,171 | 165 |
| 2018 | #675 | 433 | #1,122 | 172 |
| 2017 | #1,042 | 247 | #1,090 | 179 |
| 2016 | #1,078 | 241 | #1,339 | 133 |
| 2015 | #1,337 | 177 | #1,297 | 137 |
| 2014 | #1,352 | 173 | #1,456 | 112 |
| 2013 | #1,624 | 132 | #1,444 | 114 |
| 2012 | #1,575 | 138 | #1,448 | 114 |
| 2011 | #2,638 | 67 | #1,620 | 94 |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | #1,778 | 83 |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 | #1,665 | 94 |
| 2008 | #6,559 | 20 | #1,775 | 84 |
| 2007 | #5,709 | 24 | #1,464 | 109 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #1,526 | 98 |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #1,674 | 80 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #1,542 | 86 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #1,702 | 72 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #2,019 | 54 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #1,893 | 58 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #1,725 | 65 |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #1,624 | 66 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | #1,398 | 82 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #1,730 | 56 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #1,986 | 44 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #2,210 | 36 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #1,734 | 51 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #2,050 | 39 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #2,362 | 31 |
| 1991 | — | #2,052 | 36 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,685 | 48 | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #1,993 | 36 |
| 1988 | — | #2,255 | 27 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,725 | 19 | |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #1,725 | 36 |
| 1985 | — | #2,171 | 25 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,159 | 24 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,912 | 15 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | — | #2,003 | 27 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,168 | 13 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,400 | 11 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,361 | 19 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,329 | 19 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,361 | 18 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,674 | 14 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,513 | 15 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,871 | 23 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,705 | 27 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,546 | 30 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,642 | 25 | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | #1,614 | 24 |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | #1,411 | 29 |
| 1966 | — | #1,450 | 28 | |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | #1,559 | 25 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #1,263 | 38 |
| 1963 | — | #1,548 | 26 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,215 | 41 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #1,156 | 46 |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #1,382 | 33 |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #1,228 | 40 |
| 1958 | — | #1,253 | 38 | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #1,130 | 46 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #1,083 | 49 |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #1,002 | 56 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #1,311 | 33 |
| 1953 | — | #1,102 | 44 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,044 | 48 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,110 | 42 | |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | #1,139 | 39 |
| 1949 | #3,393 | 10 | #899 | 59 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #945 | 54 |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | #923 | 57 |
| 1946 | — | #944 | 50 | |
| 1945 | — | #943 | 47 | |
| 1944 | #4,574 | 5 | #769 | 66 |
| 1943 | — | #724 | 79 | |
| 1942 | — | #745 | 74 | |
| 1941 | — | #708 | 76 | |
| 1940 | — | #741 | 68 | |
| 1939 | — | #784 | 60 | |
| 1938 | — | #808 | 59 | |
| 1937 | — | #700 | 73 | |
| 1936 | — | #633 | 83 | |
| 1935 | — | #614 | 91 | |
| 1934 | — | #733 | 69 | |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #606 | 92 |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #632 | 89 |
| 1931 | — | #621 | 92 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #610 | 101 |
| 1929 | — | #550 | 115 | |
| 1928 | — | #602 | 105 | |
| 1927 | — | #634 | 99 | |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #563 | 119 |
| 1925 | #4,028 | 7 | #536 | 131 |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | #563 | 126 |
| 1923 | #3,350 | 9 | #521 | 136 |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | #489 | 160 |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | #489 | 160 |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | #502 | 144 |
| 1919 | — | #502 | 140 | |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | #451 | 173 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #493 | 135 |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | #485 | 136 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #475 | 135 |
| 1914 | — | #546 | 81 | |
| 1913 | #2,540 | 7 | #465 | 85 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #465 | 72 |
| 1911 | — | #452 | 42 | |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | #569 | 25 |
| 1909 | — | #473 | 29 | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | #383 | 37 |
| 1907 | — | #495 | 22 | |
| 1906 | — | #424 | 27 | |
| 1905 | — | #525 | 19 | |
| 1904 | — | #492 | 19 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #687 | 11 | |
| 1901 | — | #422 | 20 | |
| 1900 | — | #518 | 21 | |
| 1899 | — | #661 | 10 | |
| 1898 | — | #523 | 16 | |
| 1897 | — | #392 | 23 | |
| 1896 | — | #641 | 12 | |
| 1895 | — | #579 | 13 | |
| 1894 | — | #464 | 18 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #688 | 10 | |
| 1891 | — | #456 | 15 | |
| 1890 | — | #629 | 10 | |
| 1889 | — | #722 | 8 | |
| 1888 | — | #484 | 16 | |
| 1887 | — | #488 | 13 | |
| 1886 | — | #540 | 12 | |
| 1885 | — | #700 | 8 | |
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #469 | 15 | |
| 1881 | — | #653 | 8 | |
| 1880 | — | #600 | 10 | |
First appearance
1908
The first year at least five girls were named Palmer! It came in at #1,676, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1909–1912, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Palmer is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- North Dakota#72 · 1 in 225
- Nebraska#95 · 1 in 338
- Iowa#96 · 1 in 380
- South Dakota#97 · 1 in 305
- Mississippi#99 · 1 in 405
Best ever in a state: #31 in South Dakota, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #72 | 12 | 1 in 225 |
| Nebraska | #95 | 21 | 1 in 338 |
| Iowa | #96 | 31 | 1 in 380 |
| South Dakota | #97 | 10 | 1 in 305 |
| Mississippi | #99 | 22 | 1 in 405 |
| Oklahoma | #118 | 30 | 1 in 493 |
| Georgia | #123 | 78 | 1 in 580 |
| Arkansas | #125 | 23 | 1 in 461 |
| Tennessee | #125 | 59 | 1 in 544 |
| Kansas | #130 | 24 | 1 in 492 |
| Kentucky | #133 | 33 | 1 in 523 |
| Alabama | #139 | 32 | 1 in 572 |
| Ohio | #144 | 74 | 1 in 639 |
| South Carolina | #144 | 31 | 1 in 590 |
| North Carolina | #147 | 69 | 1 in 674 |
| Missouri | #160 | 38 | 1 in 639 |
| Louisiana | #162 | 25 | 1 in 655 |
| Delaware | #167 | 5 | 1 in 451 |
| Indiana | #168 | 41 | 1 in 681 |
| Michigan | #177 | 49 | 1 in 729 |
| Wisconsin | #201 | 27 | 1 in 750 |
| Montana | #208 | 5 | 1 in 565 |
| Minnesota | #212 | 26 | 1 in 826 |
| Florida | #223 | 83 | 1 in 1,045 |
| Arizona | #233 | 29 | 1 in 973 |
| Illinois | #240 | 43 | 1 in 1,031 |
| Oregon | #243 | 15 | 1 in 870 |
| Idaho | #244 | 9 | 1 in 796 |
| Texas | #247 | 140 | 1 in 1,147 |
| Virginia | #272 | 30 | 1 in 1,125 |
| West Virginia | #273 | 6 | 1 in 846 |
| Utah | #287 | 15 | 1 in 1,138 |
| Pennsylvania | #303 | 36 | 1 in 1,297 |
| Maryland | #304 | 17 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Colorado | #354 | 17 | 1 in 1,372 |
| Washington | #430 | 16 | 1 in 1,804 |
| Connecticut | #540 | 5 | 1 in 2,301 |
| Massachusetts | #564 | 9 | 1 in 2,670 |
| California | #675 | 46 | 1 in 3,516 |
| New York | #679 | 24 | 1 in 3,264 |
| New Jersey | #846 | 8 | 1 in 4,438 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Palmer
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 116 spots since 2020 (#348 → #232)
- Biggest jump: 367 spots in 2018
Rise & fade · girls
117 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1908
- Peaked 2025 at #232 (1,330 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 8 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 8 yrs · run 2018–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,208
- Highest: 1 in 1,208 girls born in 2025 were named Palmer (0.08%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 70.8% of all girls named Palmer (6,646) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2012
- Mostly boys until 2011, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | #1,676 (1908) | #1,676 |
| 1910s | 45 | #2,398 (1910) | #3,310 |
| 1920s | 54 | #3,269 (1926) | #3,779 |
| 1930s | 20 | #3,109 (1933) | #3,742 |
| 1940s | 31 | #3,393 (1949) | #4,017 |
| 1950s | 45 | #2,909 (1950) | #4,829 |
| 1960s | 38 | #5,457 (1967) | #5,777 |
| 1970s | 0 | — | — |
| 1980s | 18 | #7,749 (1986) | #10,174 |
| 1990s | 61 | #7,532 (1998) | #10,582 |
| 2000s | 128 | #5,709 (2007) | #9,192 |
| 2010s | 2,296 | #461 (2019) | #2,048 |
| 2020s | 6,646 | #232 (2025) | #290 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Palmer ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: