Palmer
#232 for girls in 2025, 1,330 births · #991 for boys in 2025, 230 births
Given to girls 50.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,330 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,389since 1908
Palmer over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #232 | 1,330 | #991 | 230 |
| 2024 | #258 | 1,224 | #1,076 | 202 |
| 2023 | #277 | 1,133 | #940 | 240 |
| 2022 | #295 | 1,075 | #1,090 | 200 |
| 2021 | #330 | 996 | #987 | 222 |
| 2020 | #348 | 888 | #1,177 | 163 |
| 2019 | #461 | 675 | #1,171 | 165 |
| 2018 | #675 | 433 | #1,122 | 172 |
| 2017 | #1,042 | 247 | #1,090 | 179 |
| 2016 | #1,078 | 241 | #1,339 | 133 |
| 2015 | #1,337 | 177 | #1,297 | 137 |
| 2014 | #1,352 | 173 | #1,456 | 112 |
| 2013 | #1,624 | 132 | #1,444 | 114 |
| 2012 | #1,575 | 138 | #1,448 | 114 |
| 2011 | #2,638 | 67 | #1,620 | 94 |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | #1,778 | 83 |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 | #1,665 | 94 |
| 2008 | #6,559 | 20 | #1,775 | 84 |
| 2007 | #5,709 | 24 | #1,464 | 109 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #1,526 | 98 |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #1,674 | 80 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #1,542 | 86 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #1,702 | 72 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #2,019 | 54 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #1,893 | 58 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #1,725 | 65 |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #1,624 | 66 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | #1,398 | 82 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #1,730 | 56 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #1,986 | 44 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #2,210 | 36 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #1,734 | 51 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #2,050 | 39 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #2,362 | 31 |
| 1991 | — | #2,052 | 36 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,685 | 48 | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #1,993 | 36 |
| 1988 | — | #2,255 | 27 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,725 | 19 | |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #1,725 | 36 |
| 1985 | — | #2,171 | 25 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,159 | 24 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,912 | 15 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | — | #2,003 | 27 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,168 | 13 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,400 | 11 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,361 | 19 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,329 | 19 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,361 | 18 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,674 | 14 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,513 | 15 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,871 | 23 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,705 | 27 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,546 | 30 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,642 | 25 | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | #1,614 | 24 |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | #1,411 | 29 |
| 1966 | — | #1,450 | 28 | |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | #1,559 | 25 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #1,263 | 38 |
| 1963 | — | #1,548 | 26 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,215 | 41 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #1,156 | 46 |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #1,382 | 33 |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #1,228 | 40 |
| 1958 | — | #1,253 | 38 | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #1,130 | 46 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #1,083 | 49 |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #1,002 | 56 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #1,311 | 33 |
| 1953 | — | #1,102 | 44 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,044 | 48 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,110 | 42 | |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | #1,139 | 39 |
| 1949 | #3,393 | 10 | #899 | 59 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #945 | 54 |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | #923 | 57 |
| 1946 | — | #944 | 50 | |
| 1945 | — | #943 | 47 | |
| 1944 | #4,574 | 5 | #769 | 66 |
| 1943 | — | #724 | 79 | |
| 1942 | — | #745 | 74 | |
| 1941 | — | #708 | 76 | |
| 1940 | — | #741 | 68 | |
| 1939 | — | #784 | 60 | |
| 1938 | — | #808 | 59 | |
| 1937 | — | #700 | 73 | |
| 1936 | — | #633 | 83 | |
| 1935 | — | #614 | 91 | |
| 1934 | — | #733 | 69 | |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #606 | 92 |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #632 | 89 |
| 1931 | — | #621 | 92 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #610 | 101 |
| 1929 | — | #550 | 115 | |
| 1928 | — | #602 | 105 | |
| 1927 | — | #634 | 99 | |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #563 | 119 |
| 1925 | #4,028 | 7 | #536 | 131 |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | #563 | 126 |
| 1923 | #3,350 | 9 | #521 | 136 |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | #489 | 160 |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | #489 | 160 |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | #502 | 144 |
| 1919 | — | #502 | 140 | |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | #451 | 173 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #493 | 135 |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | #485 | 136 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #475 | 135 |
| 1914 | — | #546 | 81 | |
| 1913 | #2,540 | 7 | #465 | 85 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #465 | 72 |
| 1911 | — | #452 | 42 | |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | #569 | 25 |
| 1909 | — | #473 | 29 | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | #383 | 37 |
| 1907 | — | #495 | 22 | |
| 1906 | — | #424 | 27 | |
| 1905 | — | #525 | 19 | |
| 1904 | — | #492 | 19 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #687 | 11 | |
| 1901 | — | #422 | 20 | |
| 1900 | — | #518 | 21 | |
| 1899 | — | #661 | 10 | |
| 1898 | — | #523 | 16 | |
| 1897 | — | #392 | 23 | |
| 1896 | — | #641 | 12 | |
| 1895 | — | #579 | 13 | |
| 1894 | — | #464 | 18 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #688 | 10 | |
| 1891 | — | #456 | 15 | |
| 1890 | — | #629 | 10 | |
| 1889 | — | #722 | 8 | |
| 1888 | — | #484 | 16 | |
| 1887 | — | #488 | 13 | |
| 1886 | — | #540 | 12 | |
| 1885 | — | #700 | 8 | |
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #469 | 15 | |
| 1881 | — | #653 | 8 | |
| 1880 | — | #600 | 10 | |
The first year at least five girls were named Palmer! It came in at #1,676, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1909–1912, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Palmer is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Dakota#72 · 1 in 225
- Nebraska#95 · 1 in 338
- Iowa#96 · 1 in 380
- South Dakota#97 · 1 in 305
- Mississippi#99 · 1 in 405
Best ever in a state: #31 in South Dakota, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #72 | 12 | 1 in 225 |
| Nebraska | #95 | 21 | 1 in 338 |
| Iowa | #96 | 31 | 1 in 380 |
| South Dakota | #97 | 10 | 1 in 305 |
| Mississippi | #99 | 22 | 1 in 405 |
| Oklahoma | #118 | 30 | 1 in 493 |
| Georgia | #123 | 78 | 1 in 580 |
| Arkansas | #125 | 23 | 1 in 461 |
| Tennessee | #125 | 59 | 1 in 544 |
| Kansas | #130 | 24 | 1 in 492 |
| Kentucky | #133 | 33 | 1 in 523 |
| Alabama | #139 | 32 | 1 in 572 |
| Ohio | #144 | 74 | 1 in 639 |
| South Carolina | #144 | 31 | 1 in 590 |
| North Carolina | #147 | 69 | 1 in 674 |
| Missouri | #160 | 38 | 1 in 639 |
| Louisiana | #162 | 25 | 1 in 655 |
| Delaware | #167 | 5 | 1 in 451 |
| Indiana | #168 | 41 | 1 in 681 |
| Michigan | #177 | 49 | 1 in 729 |
| Wisconsin | #201 | 27 | 1 in 750 |
| Montana | #208 | 5 | 1 in 565 |
| Minnesota | #212 | 26 | 1 in 826 |
| Florida | #223 | 83 | 1 in 1,045 |
| Arizona | #233 | 29 | 1 in 973 |
| Illinois | #240 | 43 | 1 in 1,031 |
| Oregon | #243 | 15 | 1 in 870 |
| Idaho | #244 | 9 | 1 in 796 |
| Texas | #247 | 140 | 1 in 1,147 |
| Virginia | #272 | 30 | 1 in 1,125 |
| West Virginia | #273 | 6 | 1 in 846 |
| Utah | #287 | 15 | 1 in 1,138 |
| Pennsylvania | #303 | 36 | 1 in 1,297 |
| Maryland | #304 | 17 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Colorado | #354 | 17 | 1 in 1,372 |
| Washington | #430 | 16 | 1 in 1,804 |
| Connecticut | #540 | 5 | 1 in 2,301 |
| Massachusetts | #564 | 9 | 1 in 2,670 |
| California | #675 | 46 | 1 in 3,516 |
| New York | #679 | 24 | 1 in 3,264 |
| New Jersey | #846 | 8 | 1 in 4,438 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Palmer
- 26 spots since 2024 (#258 → #232)
- 116 spots since 2020 (#348 → #232)
- 1,105 spots since 2015 (#1,337 → #232)
- Biggest jump: 367 spots in 2018 (#1,042 → #675)
- Debuted 1908
- Peaked 2025 at #232 (1,330 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 8 yrs · run 2018–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,208 girls born in 2025 were named Palmer (0.08%)
- 70.8% of all girls named Palmer (6,646) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2011, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | #1,676 (1908) | #1,676 |
| 1910s | 45 | #2,398 (1910) | #3,310 |
| 1920s | 54 | #3,269 (1926) | #3,779 |
| 1930s | 20 | #3,109 (1933) | #3,742 |
| 1940s | 31 | #3,393 (1949) | #4,017 |
| 1950s | 45 | #2,909 (1950) | #4,829 |
| 1960s | 38 | #5,457 (1967) | #5,777 |
| 1970s | 0 | — | — |
| 1980s | 18 | #7,749 (1986) | #10,174 |
| 1990s | 61 | #7,532 (1998) | #10,582 |
| 2000s | 128 | #5,709 (2007) | #9,192 |
| 2010s | 2,296 | #461 (2019) | #2,048 |
| 2020s | 6,646 | #232 (2025) | #290 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Palmer in 2025
Top girls' names in 2025
Top boys' names in 2025
More about 2025
girls
1,607,267 girls got a published name in 2025; 1 in 1,208 of them was named Palmer, which outranked 98.7% of the 17,297 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,708,076 boys got a published name in 2025; 1 in 7,426 of them was named Palmer, which outranked 92.9% of the 13,930 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880).
- #988Ephraim231
- #988Isael231
- #988Jiraiya231
- #991Palmer230
- #991Aurelius230
- #991Blaine230
- #991Harold230
- #996Landry229
- #996Oziel229
- #998Macklin228
Tied with 4 names at #991; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.