Porter

#2,564 for girls in 2025, 68 births · #560 for boys in 2025, 531 births
Given to boys 95.4% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1880 · 38 births
Debut · boys
38 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
20,808
since 1880

Porter over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Porter has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201938peak #273, 1880boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,56468#560531
2024#2,43474#617464
2023#2,49471#499605
2022#2,29581#506592
2021#2,60866#443698
2020#2,82358#424707
2019#2,96255#478613
2018#3,29348#418749
2017#3,38746#398802
2016#2,96656#419749
2015#2,92759#375862
2014#3,77840#368857
2013#4,88728#383778
2012#4,38733#430644
2011#5,06327#449602
2010#7,21717#446602
2009#8,45414#473578
2008#6,55920#482574
2007#9,00713#474566
2006#9,28612#479553
2005#7,50015#575405
2004#11,6248#628336
2003#13,8446#646314
2002#8,83711#687265
2001#6,61916#762225
2000#11,8017#801201
1999#12,6886#859176
1998#12,4266#1,197103
1997—#1,37880
1996#13,5185#1,44571
1995#10,5147#1,47765
1994#10,5697#1,45466
1993—#1,74149
1992—#2,08537
1991—#2,01937
1990—#2,04936
1989—#2,41627
1988—#2,36725
1987—#2,27225
1986—#2,16126
1985—#1,86631
1984—#2,15924
1983—#1,78731
1982—#1,99927
1981—#2,27022
1980—#2,53619
1979—#2,89715
1978—#2,37519
1977—#1,67032
1976—#2,60116
1975—#2,00123
1974—#2,05021
1973—#1,98221
1972—#1,53531
1971—#1,49433
1970—#1,54630
1969—#1,37634
1968—#1,39331
1967—#1,65222
1966—#1,21638
1965—#1,25437
1964#6,0096#1,28837
1963—#1,19542
1962—#1,51527
1961—#1,32236
1960—#1,48629
1959—#1,30236
1958—#1,25338
1957—#1,13046
1956—#1,03253
1955—#95761
1954—#1,13743
1953—#1,10244
1952—#1,01350
1951—#1,01748
1950—#93454
1949—#87262
1948—#1,03746
1947—#90659
1946—#91153
1945—#1,00640
1944—#1,00442
1943—#80866
1942—#74873
1941—#83957
1940—#79261
1939—#80557
1938—#73070
1937—#75765
1936—#80758
1935—#88151
1934—#80859
1933—#73369
1932—#72274
1931—#70274
1930—#70478
1929—#66884
1928—#598107
1927—#72281
1926—#73176
1925—#621102
1924—#626104
1923—#68788
1922—#642101
1921—#580119
1920—#568120
1919—#559114
1918—#564115
1917#3,7137#566108
1916—#498131
1915—#555103
1914—#49797
1913—#49876
1912—#47468
1911—#44144
1910—#43040
1909—#50526
1908—#42931
1907—#42929
1906—#45624
1905—#34635
1904—#40127
1903—#43022
1902—#33733
1901—#37125
1900—#45525
1899—#36225
1898—#32934
1897—#36027
1896—#38026
1895—#38325
1894—#35826
1893—#35925
1892—#31235
1891—#38620
1890—#34526
1889—#40520
1888—#28937
1887—#46114
1886—#34824
1885—#27736
1884—#37522
1883—#34623
1882—#32428
1881—#27632
1880—#27338
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Porter was already there! It came in at #273, and was given to 38 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1887, when fewer than 15 boys a year got the name.

Where Porter is popular in 1938

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMOKentucky: #357 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,995 boysKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedKSArkansas: #305 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 2,600 boysARTennessee: #380 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,362 boysTNNorth Carolina: #499 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 7,142 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedMSAlabama: #331 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,437 boysALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Porter, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Arkansas#305 · 1 in 2,600
  2. Alabama#331 · 1 in 3,437
  3. Kentucky#357 · 1 in 3,995
  4. Tennessee#380 · 1 in 5,362
  5. North Carolina#499 · 1 in 7,142

Best ever in a state: #55 in Utah, 2007.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Arkansas#30571 in 2,600
Alabama#33181 in 3,437
Kentucky#35771 in 3,995
Tennessee#38051 in 5,362
North Carolina#49951 in 7,142
Alaska———
Arizona———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Porter
Momentum · boys
Falling
  • 57 spots since 2024 (#617 → #560)
  • 136 spots since 2020 (#424 → #560)
  • 185 spots since 2015 (#375 → #560)
  • Biggest jump: 338 spots in 1999 (#1,197 → #859)
  • Biggest drop: 196 spots in 1944 (#808 → #1,004)
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #273 (38 births)
  • Births halved by 1887, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 96 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 96 yrs · run 1880–1943
Share of babies · boys
1 in 2,224
  • Highest: 1 in 2,224 boys born in 2015 were named Porter (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,217 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
  • Its best rank, #273 in 1880, was only 1 in 2,908 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 34.9% of all boys named Porter (7,258) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s274#273 (1880)#337
1890s269#312 (1892)#357
1900s277#337 (1902)#416
1910s896#430 (1910)#508
1920s982#568 (1920)#644
1930s655#702 (1931)#765
1940s559#748 (1942)#892
1950s473#934 (1950)#1,088
1960s333#1,195 (1963)#1,370
1970s241#1,494 (1971)#2,015
1980s257#1,787 (1983)#2,183
1990s720#859 (1999)#1,570
2000s4,017#473 (2009)#601
2010s7,258#368 (2014)#416
2020s3,597#424 (2020)#508

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Porter in 1938

boys
#730
70 births · 1 in 15,845 boys

Top boys' names in 1938

  1. #1Robert62,271
  2. #2James59,102
  3. #3John50,517
  4. #4William42,433
  5. #5Richard34,385
  6. #6Charles31,151
  7. #7Donald26,677
  8. #8David22,994
  9. #9Thomas21,381
  10. #10Ronald20,295
  11. #730Porter70
More about 1938

boys

1,109,147 boys got a published name in 1938; 1 in 15,845 of them was named Porter, which outranked 81.9% of the 4,035 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Porter
  1. #724Joshua71
  2. #724Reynold71
  3. #724Vicente71
  4. #730Porter70
  5. #730Arlo70
  6. #730Guillermo70
  7. #730Kerry70
  8. #736Arlan69
  9. #736Blair69
  10. #736Duncan69

Tied with 5 names at #730; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1937
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,314Dion#2,197 → #883
  2. ↑ 448Tex#1,212 → #764
  3. ↑ 425Lonny#1,233 → #808
  4. ↑ 401Gonzalo#1,180 → #779
  5. ↑ 383Lance#722 → #339
Fallers
  1. ↓ 741Worth#1,000 → #1,741
  2. ↓ 528Estel#869 → #1,397
  3. ↓ 492Milburn#845 → #1,337
  4. ↓ 412Lonzo#835 → #1,247
  5. ↓ 405Joy#932 → #1,337

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1938 →