Rachel
#250 for girls in 2025, 1,225 births · Last seen for boys in 2018 at #12,156
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1996 · 16,121 births
- Debut · girls
- 166 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 43 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 573,957since 1880
Rachel over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #250 | 1,225 | — | |
| 2024 | #246 | 1,292 | — | |
| 2023 | #254 | 1,224 | — | |
| 2022 | #240 | 1,263 | — | |
| 2021 | #239 | 1,271 | — | |
| 2020 | #226 | 1,305 | — | |
| 2019 | #191 | 1,548 | — | |
| 2018 | #198 | 1,558 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #191 | 1,622 | — | |
| 2016 | #171 | 1,884 | — | |
| 2015 | #167 | 1,941 | — | |
| 2014 | #155 | 2,090 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | #137 | 2,325 | — | |
| 2012 | #130 | 2,420 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #115 | 2,664 | — | |
| 2010 | #99 | 3,024 | — | |
| 2009 | #89 | 3,589 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #74 | 4,087 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #59 | 4,841 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #48 | 5,551 | #9,585 | 7 |
| 2005 | #38 | 6,226 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #34 | 6,923 | #2,953 | 34 |
| 2003 | #28 | 7,997 | #5,271 | 14 |
| 2002 | #24 | 8,944 | #4,919 | 15 |
| 2001 | #24 | 9,556 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #21 | 10,687 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #19 | 11,632 | #4,162 | 17 |
| 1998 | #15 | 12,209 | #3,849 | 18 |
| 1997 | #13 | 13,798 | #3,160 | 23 |
| 1996 | #9 | 16,121 | #2,911 | 25 |
| 1995 | #12 | 16,047 | #2,626 | 28 |
| 1994 | #13 | 15,492 | #2,847 | 25 |
| 1993 | #14 | 15,974 | #2,697 | 26 |
| 1992 | #16 | 15,840 | #2,670 | 26 |
| 1991 | #14 | 16,344 | #2,227 | 32 |
| 1990 | #16 | 15,710 | #1,909 | 40 |
| 1989 | #18 | 15,357 | #993 | 106 |
| 1988 | #19 | 15,348 | #1,307 | 62 |
| 1987 | #17 | 15,646 | #1,218 | 63 |
| 1986 | #15 | 15,455 | #1,299 | 56 |
| 1985 | #13 | 16,360 | #1,050 | 77 |
| 1984 | #15 | 15,839 | #976 | 83 |
| 1983 | #20 | 14,591 | #1,448 | 43 |
| 1982 | #21 | 13,871 | #1,140 | 64 |
| 1981 | #22 | 12,590 | #1,309 | 50 |
| 1980 | #23 | 11,618 | #1,214 | 57 |
| 1979 | #27 | 10,230 | #1,464 | 41 |
| 1978 | #25 | 9,802 | #1,508 | 38 |
| 1977 | #26 | 8,976 | #1,490 | 38 |
| 1976 | #23 | 8,453 | #1,781 | 28 |
| 1975 | #26 | 8,225 | #2,001 | 23 |
| 1974 | #36 | 7,399 | #1,471 | 35 |
| 1973 | #42 | 6,103 | #1,982 | 21 |
| 1972 | #40 | 6,417 | #2,418 | 15 |
| 1971 | #54 | 6,115 | #1,526 | 32 |
| 1970 | #58 | 6,029 | #1,989 | 20 |
| 1969 | #69 | 5,242 | #1,977 | 18 |
| 1968 | #92 | 3,727 | #2,576 | 11 |
| 1967 | #105 | 3,312 | #2,352 | 12 |
| 1966 | #154 | 2,277 | #2,986 | 8 |
| 1965 | #175 | 2,011 | #2,366 | 12 |
| 1964 | #173 | 2,261 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #179 | 2,178 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | #194 | 1,941 | #3,305 | 7 |
| 1961 | #186 | 2,054 | #3,356 | 7 |
| 1960 | #198 | 1,792 | — | |
| 1959 | #201 | 1,744 | #3,290 | 7 |
| 1958 | #201 | 1,663 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #194 | 1,821 | #3,257 | 7 |
| 1956 | #197 | 1,672 | #2,798 | 9 |
| 1955 | #185 | 1,802 | #2,219 | 13 |
| 1954 | #182 | 1,805 | #3,827 | 5 |
| 1953 | #175 | 1,780 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #185 | 1,599 | #2,376 | 11 |
| 1951 | #202 | 1,435 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #188 | 1,454 | — | |
| 1949 | #191 | 1,437 | #3,298 | 6 |
| 1948 | #195 | 1,388 | — | |
| 1947 | #190 | 1,447 | — | |
| 1946 | #195 | 1,234 | — | |
| 1945 | #174 | 1,207 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #171 | 1,250 | — | |
| 1943 | #170 | 1,371 | #2,732 | 8 |
| 1942 | #163 | 1,427 | #2,386 | 10 |
| 1941 | #159 | 1,384 | #1,685 | 17 |
| 1940 | #166 | 1,264 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #160 | 1,345 | #2,449 | 9 |
| 1938 | #165 | 1,279 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1937 | #163 | 1,229 | #2,088 | 12 |
| 1936 | #163 | 1,208 | #1,639 | 17 |
| 1935 | #164 | 1,198 | #2,246 | 11 |
| 1934 | #163 | 1,181 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #161 | 1,142 | #2,368 | 10 |
| 1932 | #156 | 1,254 | #2,313 | 11 |
| 1931 | #161 | 1,171 | — | |
| 1930 | #164 | 1,261 | #3,592 | 6 |
| 1929 | #167 | 1,214 | #2,452 | 11 |
| 1928 | #177 | 1,180 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #169 | 1,286 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #164 | 1,389 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #165 | 1,439 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #157 | 1,600 | — | |
| 1923 | #160 | 1,483 | #4,239 | 5 |
| 1922 | #154 | 1,541 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #152 | 1,583 | #2,804 | 10 |
| 1920 | #156 | 1,484 | #3,208 | 8 |
| 1919 | #149 | 1,488 | #3,115 | 8 |
| 1918 | #148 | 1,542 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #157 | 1,339 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #153 | 1,328 | #2,926 | 8 |
| 1915 | #156 | 1,205 | #3,082 | 7 |
| 1914 | #151 | 975 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #145 | 827 | — | |
| 1912 | #151 | 703 | — | |
| 1911 | #150 | 537 | — | |
| 1910 | #150 | 538 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #154 | 462 | — | |
| 1908 | #159 | 425 | — | |
| 1907 | #154 | 420 | — | |
| 1906 | #158 | 366 | — | |
| 1905 | #143 | 421 | — | |
| 1904 | #152 | 356 | — | |
| 1903 | #142 | 383 | — | |
| 1902 | #141 | 393 | — | |
| 1901 | #135 | 369 | — | |
| 1900 | #153 | 379 | #1,310 | 5 |
| 1899 | #145 | 324 | #1,051 | 5 |
| 1898 | #138 | 367 | — | |
| 1897 | #154 | 297 | — | |
| 1896 | #137 | 348 | — | |
| 1895 | #130 | 351 | — | |
| 1894 | #136 | 317 | — | |
| 1893 | #134 | 321 | — | |
| 1892 | #122 | 369 | — | |
| 1891 | #133 | 267 | — | |
| 1890 | #124 | 318 | — | |
| 1889 | #134 | 266 | — | |
| 1888 | #129 | 281 | — | |
| 1887 | #126 | 226 | — | |
| 1886 | #130 | 213 | — | |
| 1885 | #122 | 212 | — | |
| 1884 | #114 | 230 | — | |
| 1883 | #121 | 174 | — | |
| 1882 | #109 | 203 | — | |
| 1881 | #113 | 157 | — | |
| 1880 | #109 | 166 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Rachel was already there! It came in at #109, and was given to 166 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 240 girls a year got the name.
Where Rachel is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Carolina#49 · 1 in 228
- New Hampshire#54 · 1 in 170
- Maine#58 · 1 in 207
- Arizona#62 · 1 in 221
- South Carolina#88 · 1 in 348
Best ever in a state: #3 in Hawaii, 1995.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #49 | 161 | 1 in 228 |
| New Hampshire | #54 | 18 | 1 in 170 |
| Maine | #58 | 31 | 1 in 207 |
| Arizona | #62 | 17 | 1 in 221 |
| South Carolina | #88 | 60 | 1 in 348 |
| California | #90 | 88 | 1 in 389 |
| Vermont | #97 | 6 | 1 in 398 |
| Hawaii | #105 | 9 | 1 in 371 |
| Virginia | #105 | 59 | 1 in 416 |
| Mississippi | #114 | 49 | 1 in 449 |
| Rhode Island | #125 | 7 | 1 in 637 |
| Tennessee | #126 | 48 | 1 in 565 |
| Georgia | #129 | 54 | 1 in 569 |
| District of Columbia | #131 | 5 | 1 in 761 |
| New Mexico | #138 | 10 | 1 in 473 |
| Florida | #140 | 21 | 1 in 584 |
| Kansas | #146 | 18 | 1 in 733 |
| Massachusetts | #146 | 28 | 1 in 1,068 |
| Alabama | #157 | 44 | 1 in 679 |
| Pennsylvania | #163 | 63 | 1 in 1,178 |
| Texas | #165 | 74 | 1 in 760 |
| West Virginia | #166 | 23 | 1 in 763 |
| Kentucky | #168 | 34 | 1 in 804 |
| New Jersey | #171 | 22 | 1 in 1,209 |
| Colorado | #178 | 9 | 1 in 874 |
| Indiana | #191 | 17 | 1 in 1,340 |
| Maryland | #191 | 9 | 1 in 1,350 |
| Ohio | #195 | 29 | 1 in 1,576 |
| Connecticut | #198 | 6 | 1 in 1,674 |
| Minnesota | #200 | 13 | 1 in 1,489 |
| Wisconsin | #200 | 14 | 1 in 1,644 |
| New York | #204 | 55 | 1 in 1,602 |
| Oklahoma | #209 | 20 | 1 in 1,098 |
| Louisiana | #221 | 20 | 1 in 1,049 |
| Arkansas | #223 | 17 | 1 in 1,103 |
| Illinois | #223 | 29 | 1 in 1,742 |
| Missouri | #227 | 17 | 1 in 1,627 |
| Iowa | #235 | 9 | 1 in 1,975 |
| Michigan | #273 | 14 | 1 in 2,622 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rachel
- 4 spots since 2024 (#246 → #250)
- 24 spots since 2020 (#226 → #250)
- 83 spots since 2015 (#167 → #250)
- Biggest jump: 49 spots in 1967 (#154 → #105)
- Biggest drop: 35 spots in 2020 (#191 → #226)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1996 at #9 (16,121 births)
- Births halved by 2003, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: 1 yr · 1996
- Top 100: 43 yrs · run 1968–2010
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 105 girls born in 1985 were named Rachel (0.95%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,312 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
- Its best rank, #9 in 1996, was only 1 in 109 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 26.0% of all girls named Rachel (149,167) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,128 | #109 (1882) | #121 |
| 1890s | 3,279 | #122 (1892) | #135 |
| 1900s | 3,974 | #135 (1901) | #149 |
| 1910s | 10,482 | #145 (1913) | #151 |
| 1920s | 14,199 | #152 (1921) | #162 |
| 1930s | 12,268 | #156 (1932) | #162 |
| 1940s | 13,409 | #159 (1941) | #177 |
| 1950s | 16,775 | #175 (1953) | #191 |
| 1960s | 26,795 | #69 (1969) | #153 |
| 1970s | 77,749 | #23 (1976) | #36 |
| 1980s | 146,675 | #13 (1985) | #18 |
| 1990s | 149,167 | #9 (1996) | #14 |
| 2000s | 68,401 | #21 (2000) | #44 |
| 2010s | 21,076 | #99 (2010) | #155 |
| 2020s | 7,580 | #226 (2020) | #243 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rachel in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 851 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 96.9% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 94,923 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 46.0% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,191Ulus12
- #2,191Valdemar12
- #2,191Walden12
- #2,313Rachel11
- #2,313Aime11
- #2,313Albion11
- #2,313Alcide11
- #2,465Abbott10
- #2,465Adelard10
- #2,465Almer10
Tied with 151 names at #2,313; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.