Rachel

#250 for girls in 2025, 1,225 births · Last seen for boys in 2018 at #12,156
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1996 · 16,121 births
Debut · girls
166 births
In top 100 · girls
43 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
573,957
since 1880

Rachel over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201956peak #9, 1996girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2501,225—
2024#2461,292—
2023#2541,224—
2022#2401,263—
2021#2391,271—
2020#2261,305—
2019#1911,548—
2018#1981,558#12,1565
2017#1911,622—
2016#1711,884—
2015#1671,941—
2014#1552,090#12,1085
2013#1372,325—
2012#1302,420#9,7097
2011#1152,664—
2010#993,024—
2009#893,589#12,4915
2008#744,087#12,5535
2007#594,841#9,7887
2006#485,551#9,5857
2005#386,226#5,87513
2004#346,923#2,95334
2003#287,997#5,27114
2002#248,944#4,91915
2001#249,556#7,5368
2000#2110,687#5,58812
1999#1911,632#4,16217
1998#1512,209#3,84918
1997#1313,798#3,16023
1996#916,121#2,91125
1995#1216,047#2,62628
1994#1315,492#2,84725
1993#1415,974#2,69726
1992#1615,840#2,67026
1991#1416,344#2,22732
1990#1615,710#1,90940
1989#1815,357#993106
1988#1915,348#1,30762
1987#1715,646#1,21863
1986#1515,455#1,29956
1985#1316,360#1,05077
1984#1515,839#97683
1983#2014,591#1,44843
1982#2113,871#1,14064
1981#2212,590#1,30950
1980#2311,618#1,21457
1979#2710,230#1,46441
1978#259,802#1,50838
1977#268,976#1,49038
1976#238,453#1,78128
1975#268,225#2,00123
1974#367,399#1,47135
1973#426,103#1,98221
1972#406,417#2,41815
1971#546,115#1,52632
1970#586,029#1,98920
1969#695,242#1,97718
1968#923,727#2,57611
1967#1053,312#2,35212
1966#1542,277#2,9868
1965#1752,011#2,36612
1964#1732,261#3,6016
1963#1792,178#4,0485
1962#1941,941#3,3057
1961#1862,054#3,3567
1960#1981,792—
1959#2011,744#3,2907
1958#2011,663#3,5596
1957#1941,821#3,2577
1956#1971,672#2,7989
1955#1851,802#2,21913
1954#1821,805#3,8275
1953#1751,780#2,7099
1952#1851,599#2,37611
1951#2021,435#3,0667
1950#1881,454—
1949#1911,437#3,2986
1948#1951,388—
1947#1901,447—
1946#1951,234—
1945#1741,207#2,7437
1944#1711,250—
1943#1701,371#2,7328
1942#1631,427#2,38610
1941#1591,384#1,68517
1940#1661,264#2,8717
1939#1601,345#2,4499
1938#1651,279#2,4799
1937#1631,229#2,08812
1936#1631,208#1,63917
1935#1641,198#2,24611
1934#1631,181#2,02213
1933#1611,142#2,36810
1932#1561,254#2,31311
1931#1611,171—
1930#1641,261#3,5926
1929#1671,214#2,45211
1928#1771,180#3,0768
1927#1691,286#3,4517
1926#1641,389#3,1398
1925#1651,439#3,1558
1924#1571,600—
1923#1601,483#4,2395
1922#1541,541#2,80110
1921#1521,583#2,80410
1920#1561,484#3,2088
1919#1491,488#3,1158
1918#1481,542#3,7286
1917#1571,339#3,9815
1916#1531,328#2,9268
1915#1561,205#3,0827
1914#151975#3,2645
1913#145827—
1912#151703—
1911#150537—
1910#150538#1,5895
1909#154462—
1908#159425—
1907#154420—
1906#158366—
1905#143421—
1904#152356—
1903#142383—
1902#141393—
1901#135369—
1900#153379#1,3105
1899#145324#1,0515
1898#138367—
1897#154297—
1896#137348—
1895#130351—
1894#136317—
1893#134321—
1892#122369—
1891#133267—
1890#124318—
1889#134266—
1888#129281—
1887#126226—
1886#130213—
1885#122212—
1884#114230—
1883#121174—
1882#109203—
1881#113157—
1880#109166—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Rachel was already there! It came in at #109, and was given to 166 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 240 girls a year got the name.

Where Rachel is popular in 1956

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedAKMaine: #92 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 334 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: #109 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 447 girlsNHWashington: #233 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,364 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedIDMontana: #158 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 686 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #161 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 748 girlsNDMinnesota: #248 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,059 girlsMNIllinois: #227 for girls · 66 births · 1 in 1,589 girlsILWisconsin: #188 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 1,354 girlsWIMichigan: #277 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 2,350 girlsMINew York: #226 for girls · 117 births · 1 in 1,408 girlsNYMassachusetts: #192 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,525 girlsMARhode Island: #120 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 646 girlsRIOregon: #213 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,152 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #202 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,066 girlsSDIowa: #227 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,664 girlsIAIndiana: #237 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,741 girlsINOhio: #293 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 2,619 girlsOHPennsylvania: #247 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 1,867 girlsPANew Jersey: #293 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 2,901 girlsNJConnecticut: #157 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 942 girlsCTCalifornia: #156 for girls · 207 births · 1 in 756 girlsCAUtah: #300 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,756 girlsUTColorado: #316 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,343 girlsCONebraska: #266 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,807 girlsNEMissouri: #215 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 1,493 girlsMOKentucky: #227 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,677 girlsKYWest Virginia: #218 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,422 girlsWVVirginia: #182 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 1,088 girlsVAMaryland: #208 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,403 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedDEArizona: #116 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 431 girlsAZNew Mexico: #144 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 549 girlsNMKansas: #331 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,755 girlsKSArkansas: #180 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 944 girlsARTennessee: #222 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,536 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #121 for girls · 83 births · 1 in 624 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #123 for girls · 50 births · 1 in 579 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #171 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 901 girlsDCOklahoma: #230 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,486 girlsOKLouisiana: #256 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,458 girlsLAMississippi: #195 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 957 girlsMSAlabama: #164 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 833 girlsALGeorgia: #180 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 953 girlsGAHawaii: #232 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 898 girlsHITexas: #101 for girls · 246 births · 1 in 467 girlsTXFlorida: #285 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,954 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Maine#92 · 1 in 334
  2. Texas#101 · 1 in 467
  3. New Hampshire#109 · 1 in 447
  4. Arizona#116 · 1 in 431
  5. Rhode Island#120 · 1 in 646

Best ever in a state: #3 in Hawaii, 1995.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maine#92291 in 334
Texas#1012461 in 467
New Hampshire#109121 in 447
Arizona#116301 in 431
Rhode Island#120131 in 646
North Carolina#121831 in 624
South Carolina#123501 in 579
New Mexico#144201 in 549
California#1562071 in 756
Connecticut#157251 in 942
Montana#158101 in 686
North Dakota#16191 in 748
Alabama#164441 in 833
District of Columbia#171151 in 901
Arkansas#180201 in 944
Georgia#180491 in 953
Virginia#182381 in 1,088
Wisconsin#188311 in 1,354
Massachusetts#192341 in 1,525
Mississippi#195281 in 957
South Dakota#20271 in 1,066
Maryland#208211 in 1,403
Oregon#213141 in 1,152
Missouri#215301 in 1,493
West Virginia#218141 in 1,422
Tennessee#222251 in 1,536
New York#2261171 in 1,408
Illinois#227661 in 1,589
Iowa#227171 in 1,664
Kentucky#227201 in 1,677
Oklahoma#230151 in 1,486
Hawaii#23271 in 898
Washington#233211 in 1,364
Indiana#237291 in 1,741
Pennsylvania#247621 in 1,867
Minnesota#248181 in 2,059
Louisiana#256271 in 1,458
Nebraska#26681 in 1,807
Michigan#277401 in 2,350
Florida#285221 in 1,954
New Jersey#293191 in 2,901
Ohio#293411 in 2,619
Utah#30061 in 1,756
Colorado#31681 in 2,343
Kansas#33181 in 2,755
Alaska———
Delaware———
Idaho———
Nevada———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rachel
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 4 spots since 2024 (#246 → #250)
  • 24 spots since 2020 (#226 → #250)
  • 83 spots since 2015 (#167 → #250)
  • Biggest jump: 49 spots in 1967 (#154 → #105)
  • Biggest drop: 35 spots in 2020 (#191 → #226)
Rise & fade · girls
116 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1996 at #9 (16,121 births)
  • Births halved by 2003, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: 1 yr · 1996
  • Top 100: 43 yrs · run 1968–2010
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 105
  • Highest: 1 in 105 girls born in 1985 were named Rachel (0.95%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,312 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
  • Its best rank, #9 in 1996, was only 1 in 109 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 26.0% of all girls named Rachel (149,167) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,128#109 (1882)#121
1890s3,279#122 (1892)#135
1900s3,974#135 (1901)#149
1910s10,482#145 (1913)#151
1920s14,199#152 (1921)#162
1930s12,268#156 (1932)#162
1940s13,409#159 (1941)#177
1950s16,775#175 (1953)#191
1960s26,795#69 (1969)#153
1970s77,749#23 (1976)#36
1980s146,675#13 (1985)#18
1990s149,167#9 (1996)#14
2000s68,401#21 (2000)#44
2010s21,076#99 (2010)#155
2020s7,580#226 (2020)#243

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rachel in 1956

girls
#197
1,672 births · 1 in 1,201 girls
boys
#2,798
9 births · 1 in 235,034 boys

Top girls' names in 1956

  1. #1Mary61,741
  2. #2Debra48,324
  3. #3Linda48,084
  4. #4Deborah47,834
  5. #5Susan46,558
  6. #6Patricia43,329
  7. #7Karen40,052
  8. #8Cynthia32,339
  9. #9Barbara32,302
  10. #10Donna29,852
  11. #197Rachel1,672

Top boys' names in 1956

  1. #1Michael90,691
  2. #2James84,897
  3. #3Robert83,924
  4. #4David81,652
  5. #5John80,804
  6. #6William58,991
  7. #7Richard52,915
  8. #8Mark48,828
  9. #9Thomas44,836
  10. #10Steven38,413
  11. #2,798Rachel9
More about 1956

girls

2,007,703 girls got a published name in 1956; 1 in 1,201 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 97.1% of the 6,891 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rachel
  1. #194Jody1,749
  2. #195Sheri1,716
  3. #196Shelley1,681
  4. #197Rachel1,672
  5. #198Dolores1,660
  6. #199Ramona1,643
  7. #200Mildred1,636
Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
  1. ↑ 993Sheena#1,839 → #846
  2. ↑ 770Glendora#1,733 → #963
  3. ↑ 684Leesa#1,209 → #525
  4. ↑ 543Marisa#1,074 → #531
  5. ↑ 537Dani#1,383 → #846
Fallers
  1. ↓ 513Sheilah#663 → #1,176
  2. ↓ 481Jeryl#768 → #1,249
  3. ↓ 344Jacalyn#496 → #840
  4. ↓ 325Roni#536 → #861
  5. ↓ 314Florine#984 → #1,298

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 235,034 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 37.2% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rachel
  1. #2,628York10
  2. #2,628Yvonne10
  3. #2,628Zeno10
  4. #2,798Rachel9
  5. #2,798Adell9
  6. #2,798Aden9
  7. #2,798Adolf9
  8. #2,969Abelino8
  9. #2,969Agustine8
  10. #2,969Ahmed8

Tied with 170 names at #2,798; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,847Jace#2,764 → #917
  2. ↑ 678Rich#1,572 → #894
  3. ↑ 590Broderick#1,273 → #683
  4. ↑ 559Elvis#921 → #362
  5. ↑ 513Tracey#1,419 → #906
Fallers
  1. ↓ 351Adolphus#906 → #1,257
  2. ↓ 336Randolf#949 → #1,285
  3. ↓ 279Cordell#792 → #1,071
  4. ↓ 272Rudolfo#885 → #1,157
  5. ↓ 269Aurelio#949 → #1,218

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1956 →