Raegan
#505 for girls in 2025, 589 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 98.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2019 · 1,406 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 25,214since 1963
Raegan over time
Rank among girls' names. Raegan has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #505 | 589 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #458 | 683 | #7,257 | 11 |
| 2023 | #420 | 730 | #6,897 | 12 |
| 2022 | #324 | 994 | #7,768 | 10 |
| 2021 | #281 | 1,126 | #6,335 | 13 |
| 2020 | #259 | 1,172 | #5,699 | 15 |
| 2019 | #219 | 1,406 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #264 | 1,245 | #4,739 | 20 |
| 2017 | #262 | 1,218 | #5,526 | 16 |
| 2016 | #282 | 1,133 | #4,943 | 19 |
| 2015 | #271 | 1,167 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #323 | 1,025 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #307 | 1,043 | #5,404 | 16 |
| 2012 | #295 | 1,082 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #342 | 931 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2010 | #359 | 889 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #374 | 862 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | #395 | 816 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #401 | 816 | #8,173 | 9 |
| 2006 | #438 | 727 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #493 | 619 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #492 | 598 | #4,602 | 18 |
| 2003 | #541 | 515 | — | |
| 2002 | #522 | 524 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #550 | 478 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #618 | 411 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #714 | 317 | — | |
| 1998 | #757 | 284 | — | |
| 1997 | #792 | 263 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,032 | 181 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,120 | 158 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,357 | 123 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,898 | 74 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,239 | 59 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,420 | 52 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,022 | 37 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,477 | 29 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,393 | 28 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,857 | 22 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,476 | 16 | — | |
| 1982 | #4,527 | 16 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,028 | 51 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,433 | 85 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,364 | 90 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,487 | 76 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,380 | 81 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,060 | 42 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,381 | 76 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #1,688 | 54 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,342 | 19 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,091 | 14 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,845 | 12 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,937 | 18 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,050 | 17 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,825 | 20 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Raegan! It came in at #4,539, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1967–1971, when fewer than 13 girls a year got the name.
Where Raegan is popular in 2012
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wyoming#49 · 1 in 144
- West Virginia#96 · 1 in 367
- Idaho#125 · 1 in 455
- Utah#135 · 1 in 559
- Rhode Island#137 · 1 in 426
Best ever in a state: #49 in Wyoming, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #49 | 8 | 1 in 144 |
| West Virginia | #96 | 18 | 1 in 367 |
| Idaho | #125 | 14 | 1 in 455 |
| Utah | #135 | 32 | 1 in 559 |
| Rhode Island | #137 | 7 | 1 in 426 |
| South Carolina | #145 | 28 | 1 in 622 |
| Louisiana | #176 | 26 | 1 in 758 |
| Indiana | #182 | 39 | 1 in 770 |
| Alabama | #191 | 24 | 1 in 769 |
| Kentucky | #191 | 23 | 1 in 789 |
| Oklahoma | #193 | 21 | 1 in 785 |
| Georgia | #198 | 52 | 1 in 910 |
| Michigan | #198 | 48 | 1 in 858 |
| Kansas | #214 | 16 | 1 in 822 |
| Pennsylvania | #216 | 52 | 1 in 1,014 |
| Mississippi | #224 | 13 | 1 in 818 |
| Ohio | #226 | 49 | 1 in 1,053 |
| North Carolina | #236 | 41 | 1 in 1,072 |
| Missouri | #250 | 25 | 1 in 1,077 |
| Wisconsin | #266 | 21 | 1 in 1,097 |
| Massachusetts | #270 | 21 | 1 in 1,211 |
| Maryland | #272 | 21 | 1 in 1,147 |
| Virginia | #294 | 28 | 1 in 1,299 |
| Iowa | #295 | 10 | 1 in 1,253 |
| Tennessee | #299 | 23 | 1 in 1,299 |
| Florida | #306 | 54 | 1 in 1,475 |
| Arkansas | #307 | 10 | 1 in 1,139 |
| Nebraska | #310 | 7 | 1 in 1,107 |
| Washington | #315 | 23 | 1 in 1,324 |
| Illinois | #322 | 39 | 1 in 1,507 |
| Nevada | #338 | 8 | 1 in 1,291 |
| New Mexico | #341 | 6 | 1 in 1,181 |
| Connecticut | #345 | 8 | 1 in 1,463 |
| Minnesota | #368 | 15 | 1 in 1,602 |
| Oregon | #370 | 10 | 1 in 1,485 |
| Colorado | #403 | 13 | 1 in 1,723 |
| New Jersey | #479 | 16 | 1 in 2,282 |
| New York | #498 | 36 | 1 in 2,563 |
| Arizona | #505 | 14 | 1 in 2,212 |
| Texas | #505 | 63 | 1 in 2,513 |
| California | #540 | 74 | 1 in 2,825 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raegan
- 47 spots since 2024 (#458 → #505)
- 246 spots since 2020 (#259 → #505)
- 234 spots since 2015 (#271 → #505)
- Biggest jump: 240 spots in 1997 (#1,032 → #792)
- Biggest drop: 96 spots in 2023 (#324 → #420)
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2019 at #219 (1,406 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1997–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,194 girls born in 2019 were named Raegan (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,729 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 44.2% of all girls named Raegan (11,139) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 95 | #2,825 (1964) | #3,814 |
| 1970s | 469 | #1,364 (1979) | #2,815 |
| 1980s | 303 | #1,433 (1980) | #3,590 |
| 1990s | 1,548 | #714 (1999) | #1,535 |
| 2000s | 6,366 | #374 (2009) | #482 |
| 2010s | 11,139 | #219 (2019) | #292 |
| 2020s | 5,294 | #259 (2020) | #375 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Raegan in 2012
Top girls' names in 2012
Top boys' names in 2012
More about 2012
girls
1,761,053 girls got a published name in 2012; 1 in 1,628 of them was named Raegan, which outranked 98.5% of the 19,534 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,896,946 boys got a published name in 2012; 1 in 210,772 of them was named Raegan, which outranked 42.8% of the 14,250 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #7,559Zymarion10
- #7,559Zymier10
- #7,559Zyshawn10
- #8,158Raegan9
- #8,158Aarit9
- #8,158Abdulhakeem9
- #8,158Adahir9
- #8,864Aagam8
- #8,864Abanoub8
- #8,864Abdishakur8
Tied with 705 names at #8,158; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.