Randy
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #13,462 · #1,084 for boys in 2025, 198 births
Given to boys 98.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1956 · 16,547 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 37 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 329,468since 1915
Randy over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,084 | 198 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,013 | 220 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #956 | 236 |
| 2022 | #12,243 | 7 | #908 | 254 |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | #916 | 250 |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | #858 | 265 |
| 2019 | — | #708 | 349 | |
| 2018 | — | #674 | 372 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #664 | 384 |
| 2016 | — | #628 | 427 | |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #569 | 493 |
| 2014 | — | #510 | 548 | |
| 2013 | — | #448 | 641 | |
| 2012 | — | #413 | 696 | |
| 2011 | — | #356 | 841 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #347 | 883 |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #321 | 996 |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #302 | 1,102 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #318 | 1,004 |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 | #310 | 1,052 |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #306 | 1,082 |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #316 | 977 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | #317 | 936 |
| 2002 | #11,108 | 8 | #294 | 1,017 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #285 | 1,054 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #278 | 1,136 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #263 | 1,139 |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #244 | 1,276 |
| 1997 | #6,483 | 14 | #226 | 1,362 |
| 1996 | #6,064 | 15 | #206 | 1,509 |
| 1995 | #5,019 | 19 | #202 | 1,509 |
| 1994 | #4,687 | 21 | #186 | 1,644 |
| 1993 | #4,393 | 23 | #188 | 1,701 |
| 1992 | #4,088 | 25 | #159 | 2,008 |
| 1991 | #4,208 | 24 | #148 | 2,160 |
| 1990 | #3,909 | 26 | #131 | 2,477 |
| 1989 | #3,784 | 26 | #126 | 2,604 |
| 1988 | #2,867 | 36 | #112 | 2,716 |
| 1987 | #2,723 | 36 | #105 | 2,786 |
| 1986 | #2,344 | 43 | #103 | 2,728 |
| 1985 | #1,906 | 58 | #102 | 2,881 |
| 1984 | #2,149 | 46 | #100 | 2,909 |
| 1983 | #2,135 | 46 | #96 | 2,926 |
| 1982 | #2,327 | 42 | #94 | 3,229 |
| 1981 | #2,488 | 38 | #91 | 3,343 |
| 1980 | #2,014 | 52 | #87 | 3,390 |
| 1979 | #2,304 | 41 | #86 | 3,416 |
| 1978 | #1,938 | 50 | #86 | 3,220 |
| 1977 | #2,091 | 45 | #86 | 3,397 |
| 1976 | #1,729 | 55 | #79 | 3,320 |
| 1975 | #2,169 | 39 | #78 | 3,385 |
| 1974 | #2,029 | 41 | #79 | 3,342 |
| 1973 | #1,805 | 47 | #79 | 3,345 |
| 1972 | #1,804 | 47 | #70 | 3,739 |
| 1971 | #1,500 | 67 | #67 | 4,345 |
| 1970 | #1,637 | 57 | #59 | 5,036 |
| 1969 | #1,423 | 67 | #55 | 5,265 |
| 1968 | #1,504 | 57 | #54 | 5,709 |
| 1967 | #1,133 | 87 | #49 | 6,799 |
| 1966 | #1,142 | 86 | #45 | 7,758 |
| 1965 | #957 | 114 | #42 | 8,861 |
| 1964 | #1,051 | 106 | #38 | 10,302 |
| 1963 | #973 | 119 | #37 | 10,535 |
| 1962 | #931 | 130 | #35 | 11,840 |
| 1961 | #863 | 152 | #33 | 12,603 |
| 1960 | #832 | 153 | #32 | 14,206 |
| 1959 | #744 | 187 | #31 | 15,042 |
| 1958 | #844 | 146 | #32 | 15,188 |
| 1957 | #812 | 155 | #31 | 16,464 |
| 1956 | #689 | 193 | #28 | 16,547 |
| 1955 | #677 | 191 | #30 | 14,958 |
| 1954 | #656 | 195 | #33 | 12,638 |
| 1953 | #619 | 205 | #35 | 10,666 |
| 1952 | #562 | 239 | #41 | 8,646 |
| 1951 | #565 | 227 | #56 | 6,034 |
| 1950 | #597 | 200 | #80 | 4,354 |
| 1949 | #650 | 163 | #92 | 3,623 |
| 1948 | #652 | 163 | #99 | 3,141 |
| 1947 | #791 | 120 | #116 | 2,501 |
| 1946 | #786 | 109 | #148 | 1,637 |
| 1945 | #1,114 | 50 | #162 | 1,107 |
| 1944 | #1,293 | 38 | #191 | 805 |
| 1943 | #1,154 | 49 | #242 | 584 |
| 1942 | #1,387 | 34 | #315 | 379 |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #406 | 207 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | #433 | 181 |
| 1939 | — | #492 | 137 | |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | #583 | 101 |
| 1937 | — | #665 | 80 | |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #797 | 59 |
| 1935 | — | #915 | 48 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,150 | 33 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,586 | 19 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,716 | 18 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,003 | 14 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,602 | 21 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,317 | 12 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,843 | 9 | |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #2,523 | 11 |
| 1926 | #4,851 | 5 | #2,302 | 13 |
| 1925 | — | #3,408 | 7 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | — | #3,252 | 8 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | #3,489 | 7 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,736 | 6 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,368 | 7 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | #3,897 | 5 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,392 | 6 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Randy! It came in at #3,392, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1916–1917, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Randy is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#16 · 1 in 85
- Iowa#20 · 1 in 89
- North Dakota#20 · 1 in 90
- Arkansas#21 · 1 in 94
- Tennessee#22 · 1 in 96
Best ever in a state: #10 in Utah, 1952.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #16 | 277 | 1 in 85 |
| Iowa | #20 | 325 | 1 in 89 |
| North Dakota | #20 | 76 | 1 in 90 |
| Arkansas | #21 | 208 | 1 in 94 |
| Tennessee | #22 | 404 | 1 in 96 |
| North Carolina | #23 | 497 | 1 in 104 |
| Vermont | #23 | 47 | 1 in 82 |
| Idaho | #24 | 67 | 1 in 104 |
| Nebraska | #24 | 156 | 1 in 104 |
| Kansas | #25 | 210 | 1 in 105 |
| Montana | #25 | 74 | 1 in 100 |
| South Dakota | #25 | 74 | 1 in 104 |
| Minnesota | #26 | 353 | 1 in 115 |
| Colorado | #29 | 168 | 1 in 128 |
| Missouri | #29 | 395 | 1 in 118 |
| Mississippi | #30 | 191 | 1 in 141 |
| South Carolina | #30 | 191 | 1 in 143 |
| Utah | #30 | 88 | 1 in 137 |
| Wisconsin | #30 | 375 | 1 in 121 |
| Wyoming | #30 | 26 | 1 in 126 |
| Georgia | #31 | 350 | 1 in 134 |
| Oregon | #31 | 145 | 1 in 119 |
| West Virginia | #31 | 142 | 1 in 125 |
| Louisiana | #32 | 263 | 1 in 154 |
| Washington | #32 | 226 | 1 in 135 |
| Maine | #33 | 72 | 1 in 149 |
| Michigan | #33 | 575 | 1 in 154 |
| Alabama | #34 | 263 | 1 in 138 |
| Ohio | #35 | 664 | 1 in 159 |
| Arizona | #37 | 104 | 1 in 162 |
| Indiana | #37 | 362 | 1 in 144 |
| Pennsylvania | #38 | 611 | 1 in 182 |
| Texas | #38 | 692 | 1 in 172 |
| New Mexico | #40 | 80 | 1 in 166 |
| California | #41 | 954 | 1 in 196 |
| Nevada | #42 | 22 | 1 in 153 |
| Virginia | #42 | 217 | 1 in 199 |
| Florida | #43 | 257 | 1 in 211 |
| Illinois | #43 | 542 | 1 in 203 |
| Kentucky | #43 | 190 | 1 in 180 |
| New Hampshire | #43 | 34 | 1 in 180 |
| Maryland | #55 | 108 | 1 in 293 |
| Hawaii | #60 | 32 | 1 in 236 |
| Alaska | #67 | 12 | 1 in 265 |
| New York | #68 | 430 | 1 in 407 |
| Massachusetts | #78 | 87 | 1 in 641 |
| Delaware | #80 | 12 | 1 in 413 |
| New Jersey | #82 | 116 | 1 in 530 |
| Rhode Island | #83 | 12 | 1 in 725 |
| Connecticut | #97 | 38 | 1 in 684 |
| District of Columbia | #112 | 26 | 1 in 557 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Randy
- 71 spots since 2024 (#1,013 → #1,084)
- 226 spots since 2020 (#858 → #1,084)
- 515 spots since 2015 (#569 → #1,084)
- Biggest jump: 235 spots in 1935 (#1,150 → #915)
- Biggest drop: 150 spots in 2020 (#708 → #858)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1956 at #28 (16,547 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 37 yrs · run 1948–1984
- Top 1,000: 89 yrs · run 1935–2023
- Highest: 1 in 128 boys born in 1956 were named Randy (0.78%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,627 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 36.6% of all boys named Randy (120,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 24 | #3,368 (1918) | #3,598 |
| 1920s | 79 | #2,302 (1926) | #3,105 |
| 1930s | 530 | #492 (1939) | #1,151 |
| 1940s | 14,165 | #92 (1949) | #220 |
| 1950s | 120,537 | #28 (1956) | #40 |
| 1960s | 93,878 | #32 (1960) | #42 |
| 1970s | 36,545 | #59 (1970) | #77 |
| 1980s | 29,512 | #87 (1980) | #102 |
| 1990s | 16,785 | #131 (1990) | #195 |
| 2000s | 10,356 | #278 (2000) | #305 |
| 2010s | 5,634 | #347 (2010) | #532 |
| 2020s | 1,423 | #858 (2020) | #956 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Randy in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 15,128 of them was named Randy, which outranked 87.7% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 175 of them was named Randy, which outranked 99.2% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.