Rhea

#639 for girls in 2025, 452 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 98.0% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1893 · 56 births
Debut · girls
7 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
19,737
since 1882

Rhea over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Rhea has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201920peak #360, 1893girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#639452—
2024#613487—
2023#527577—
2022#600500—
2021#614485—
2020#625464—
2019#703411—
2018#756360—
2017#860318—
2016#947289—
2015#994271—
2014#1,092233—
2013#1,111219—
2012#1,096225—
2011#1,189202—
2010#1,165208—
2009#1,174214—
2008#1,250201—
2007#1,147223—
2006#1,167208—
2005#1,305170—
2004#908266#11,3565
2003#1,126195—
2002#1,008217—
2001#1,170176—
2000#1,168172—
1999#1,304139—
1998#1,520111—
1997#1,327130—
1996#1,78083—
1995#1,439112—
1994#1,58396—
1993#1,258136—
1992#1,274134—
1991#1,453109—
1990#1,307124—
1989#1,250126—
1988#1,376103—
1987#1,195121—
1986#1,219113—
1985#1,109130—
1984#1,059132—
1983#1,005141—
1982#1,221109—
1981#1,025140—
1980#1,087129—
1979#1,184111—
1978#1,014134—
1977#1,079120—
1976#1,145102#4,9356
1975#1,119104#5,4645
1974#1,28483—
1973#1,23185—
1972#1,32576—
1971#1,22192—
1970#1,29383—
1969#1,16991—
1968#978113—
1967#1,10389—
1966#1,022102#3,5376
1965#1,05599—
1964#1,091100#3,6016
1963#970120—
1962#1,006114#3,6406
1961#1,014114—
1960#1,009113#3,3377
1959#904133—
1958#829150—
1957#865138#3,5526
1956#944114#2,9698
1955#849131#3,8865
1954#910112—
1953#826126#3,1437
1952#836120#2,8758
1951#840113#2,8448
1950#827111#2,5809
1949#779123#3,0197
1948#686146#3,3166
1947#751130#3,0967
1946#716127#2,6908
1945#81087#2,7437
1944#77198#2,4679
1943#736110#2,5639
1942#678121#2,7128
1941#674109—
1940#74186#2,6718
1939#674101—
1938#75684#1,97613
1937#624118#2,9057
1936#611116#3,5495
1935#660100—
1934#656104#3,2776
1933#637106—
1932#606117—
1931#602121#2,10113
1930#619125#2,60910
1929#582139#2,9808
1928#575151#2,27013
1927#643125#2,12115
1926#557162#2,30213
1925#565160#2,01216
1924#594155#2,22914
1923#633135#2,22414
1922#530177#2,34713
1921#529179#2,50212
1920#515184#2,05216
1919#510177#2,15214
1918#529174#3,3687
1917#490181#2,56210
1916#497169#2,7309
1915#469172#2,8298
1914#504123—
1913#468115—
1912#49792—
1911#43089—
1910#52860—
1909#46864—
1908#48855—
1907#45163—
1906#44758—
1905#48549—
1904#46949—
1903#50440#1,0096
1902#41655—
1901#38558—
1900#47551—
1899#37161—
1898#42054—
1897#39753—
1896#37756#1,1015
1895#44041—
1894#40448—
1893#36056—
1892#40144—
1891#52424—
1890#40639—
1889#43031—
1888#55820—
1887#60814—
1886#63313—
1885#65811—
1884#58313—
1883#6928—
1882#7407—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Rhea! It came in at #740, and was given to 7 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.

Where Rhea is popular in 1920

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWAIdaho: #186 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 871 girlsIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWIMichigan: #242 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,098 girlsMINew York: #507 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 10,973 girlsNYMassachusetts: #276 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,624 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedIAIndiana: #243 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,036 girlsINOhio: #235 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 2,127 girlsOHPennsylvania: #293 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 3,749 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedCAUtah: #96 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 339 girlsUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #387 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,833 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Utah#96 · 1 in 339
  2. Idaho#186 · 1 in 871
  3. Ohio#235 · 1 in 2,127
  4. Michigan#242 · 1 in 2,098
  5. Indiana#243 · 1 in 2,036

Best ever in a state: #75 in Wyoming, 1921.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#96151 in 339
Idaho#18651 in 871
Ohio#235261 in 2,127
Michigan#242181 in 2,098
Indiana#243131 in 2,036
Massachusetts#276101 in 3,624
Pennsylvania#293261 in 3,749
Louisiana#38781 in 2,833
New York#50791 in 10,973
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Illinois———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rhea
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 26 spots since 2024 (#613 → #639)
  • 14 spots since 2020 (#625 → #639)
  • 355 spots since 2015 (#994 → #639)
  • Biggest jump: 218 spots in 2004 (#1,126 → #908)
  • Biggest drop: 397 spots in 2005 (#908 → #1,305)
Rise & fade · girls
11 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1893 at #360 (56 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 92 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1882–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,781
  • Highest: 1 in 2,781 girls born in 2023 were named Rhea (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,556 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
  • Its best rank, #360 in 1893, was only 1 in 3,802 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2020s
  • 15.0% of all girls named Rhea (2,965) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s117#430 (1889)#613
1890s476#360 (1893)#410
1900s542#385 (1901)#459
1910s1,352#430 (1911)#492
1920s1,567#515 (1920)#572
1930s1,092#602 (1931)#645
1940s1,137#674 (1941)#734
1950s1,248#826 (1953)#863
1960s1,055#970 (1963)#1,042
1970s990#1,014 (1978)#1,190
1980s1,244#1,005 (1983)#1,155
1990s1,174#1,258 (1993)#1,425
2000s2,042#908 (2004)#1,142
2010s2,736#703 (2019)#991
2020s2,965#527 (2023)#603

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rhea in 1920

girls
#515
184 births · 1 in 6,512 girls
boys
#2,052
16 births · 1 in 66,522 boys

Top girls' names in 1920

  1. #1Mary70,983
  2. #2Dorothy36,643
  3. #3Helen35,097
  4. #4Margaret27,994
  5. #5Ruth26,102
  6. #6Mildred18,060
  7. #7Virginia17,314
  8. #8Elizabeth15,908
  9. #9Frances15,883
  10. #10Anna14,581
  11. #515Rhea184

Top boys' names in 1920

  1. #1John56,913
  2. #2William50,146
  3. #3Robert48,679
  4. #4James47,908
  5. #5Charles28,309
  6. #6George26,891
  7. #7Joseph25,587
  8. #8Edward20,097
  9. #9Frank16,430
  10. #10Richard15,010
  11. #2,052Rhea16
More about 1920

girls

1,198,289 girls got a published name in 1920; 1 in 6,512 of them was named Rhea, which outranked 91.1% of the 5,767 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rhea
  1. #511Trinidad186
  2. #513Juliette185
  3. #513Orpha185
  4. #515Rhea184
  5. #515Ava184
  6. #515Elsa184
  7. #515Margret184
  8. #519Betsy183
  9. #520Camille182
  10. #520Magdalene182

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
  1. ↑ 550Denise#1,481 → #931
  2. ↑ 321Blossom#1,242 → #921
  3. ↑ 311Lilia#1,242 → #931
  4. ↑ 302Ena#1,270 → #968
  5. ↑ 277Lorayne#1,216 → #939
Fallers
  1. ↓ 594Haruko#917 → #1,511
  2. ↓ 511Roselle#1,000 → #1,511
  3. ↓ 345Toshiko#967 → #1,312
  4. ↓ 304Carroll#902 → #1,206
  5. ↓ 297Santina#835 → #1,132

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,064,356 boys got a published name in 1920; 1 in 66,522 of them was named Rhea, which outranked 58.9% of the 4,989 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rhea
  1. #1,966Wallis17
  2. #1,966Wilma17
  3. #1,966Zollie17
  4. #2,052Rhea16
  5. #2,052Abie16
  6. #2,052Albion16
  7. #2,052Alto16
  8. #2,131Adolphe15
  9. #2,131Aime15
  10. #2,131Albertus15

Tied with 78 names at #2,052; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
  1. ↑ 960Harding#1,351 → #391
  2. ↑ 607Cameron#1,351 → #744
  3. ↑ 566Hardin#1,531 → #965
  4. ↑ 392Laurel#1,321 → #929
  5. ↑ 368Terrence#1,297 → #929
Fallers
  1. ↓ 789Pershing#593 → #1,382
  2. ↓ 580Woodroe#877 → #1,457
  3. ↓ 385Quinten#867 → #1,252
  4. ↓ 383Orvel#890 → #1,273
  5. ↓ 373Rexford#927 → #1,300

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1920 →