Rosalie
#171 for girls in 2025, 1,797 births · Last seen for boys in 1957 at #3,993
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1938 · 3,758 births
- Debut · girls
- 39 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 84,049since 1880
Rosalie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #171 | 1,797 | — | |
| 2024 | #177 | 1,705 | — | |
| 2023 | #182 | 1,645 | — | |
| 2022 | #176 | 1,692 | — | |
| 2021 | #185 | 1,595 | — | |
| 2020 | #198 | 1,473 | — | |
| 2019 | #208 | 1,467 | — | |
| 2018 | #209 | 1,470 | — | |
| 2017 | #236 | 1,351 | — | |
| 2016 | #252 | 1,252 | — | |
| 2015 | #266 | 1,194 | — | |
| 2014 | #310 | 1,060 | — | |
| 2013 | #347 | 937 | — | |
| 2012 | #405 | 771 | — | |
| 2011 | #544 | 535 | — | |
| 2010 | #589 | 498 | — | |
| 2009 | #831 | 337 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,431 | 165 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,672 | 132 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,403 | 161 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,444 | 147 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,488 | 135 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,446 | 136 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,351 | 143 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,411 | 134 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,412 | 131 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,293 | 142 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,405 | 122 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,281 | 137 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,393 | 119 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,370 | 120 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,170 | 151 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,211 | 143 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,174 | 149 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,097 | 164 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,104 | 158 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,023 | 167 | — | |
| 1988 | #940 | 179 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,058 | 145 | — | |
| 1986 | #987 | 159 | — | |
| 1985 | #963 | 160 | — | |
| 1984 | #890 | 168 | — | |
| 1983 | #954 | 154 | — | |
| 1982 | #815 | 194 | — | |
| 1981 | #846 | 184 | — | |
| 1980 | #921 | 162 | — | |
| 1979 | #836 | 186 | — | |
| 1978 | #876 | 167 | — | |
| 1977 | #918 | 153 | — | |
| 1976 | #811 | 171 | — | |
| 1975 | #886 | 150 | — | |
| 1974 | #811 | 166 | — | |
| 1973 | #778 | 172 | — | |
| 1972 | #818 | 162 | — | |
| 1971 | #809 | 172 | — | |
| 1970 | #784 | 180 | — | |
| 1969 | #679 | 214 | — | |
| 1968 | #655 | 220 | — | |
| 1967 | #609 | 244 | — | |
| 1966 | #551 | 296 | — | |
| 1965 | #534 | 317 | — | |
| 1964 | #489 | 393 | — | |
| 1963 | #450 | 460 | — | |
| 1962 | #442 | 471 | — | |
| 1961 | #436 | 509 | — | |
| 1960 | #428 | 521 | — | |
| 1959 | #402 | 545 | — | |
| 1958 | #394 | 541 | — | |
| 1957 | #383 | 563 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #362 | 585 | — | |
| 1955 | #342 | 626 | — | |
| 1954 | #327 | 674 | — | |
| 1953 | #300 | 748 | — | |
| 1952 | #293 | 764 | — | |
| 1951 | #264 | 870 | — | |
| 1950 | #259 | 874 | — | |
| 1949 | #239 | 975 | — | |
| 1948 | #219 | 1,116 | — | |
| 1947 | #226 | 1,078 | — | |
| 1946 | #211 | 1,128 | — | |
| 1945 | #203 | 975 | — | |
| 1944 | #190 | 1,098 | — | |
| 1943 | #167 | 1,425 | #3,231 | 6 |
| 1942 | #158 | 1,544 | #2,940 | 7 |
| 1941 | #152 | 1,513 | — | |
| 1940 | #139 | 1,735 | #2,179 | 11 |
| 1939 | #114 | 2,162 | #2,829 | 7 |
| 1938 | #66 | 3,758 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #179 | 1,116 | #2,332 | 10 |
| 1936 | #200 | 845 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #218 | 778 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #198 | 901 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #183 | 927 | — | |
| 1932 | #173 | 1,104 | — | |
| 1931 | #181 | 1,002 | #3,763 | 5 |
| 1930 | #175 | 1,120 | — | |
| 1929 | #175 | 1,158 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #170 | 1,236 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #177 | 1,176 | — | |
| 1926 | #180 | 1,159 | — | |
| 1925 | #191 | 1,092 | — | |
| 1924 | #189 | 1,153 | — | |
| 1923 | #188 | 1,160 | — | |
| 1922 | #191 | 1,104 | — | |
| 1921 | #193 | 1,074 | — | |
| 1920 | #200 | 984 | — | |
| 1919 | #204 | 910 | — | |
| 1918 | #210 | 890 | #4,179 | 5 |
| 1917 | #213 | 809 | — | |
| 1916 | #216 | 787 | — | |
| 1915 | #197 | 840 | — | |
| 1914 | #215 | 584 | — | |
| 1913 | #224 | 462 | — | |
| 1912 | #214 | 433 | — | |
| 1911 | #225 | 309 | — | |
| 1910 | #227 | 281 | — | |
| 1909 | #255 | 197 | — | |
| 1908 | #264 | 180 | — | |
| 1907 | #254 | 184 | — | |
| 1906 | #255 | 164 | — | |
| 1905 | #266 | 152 | — | |
| 1904 | #234 | 173 | — | |
| 1903 | #276 | 127 | — | |
| 1902 | #246 | 155 | — | |
| 1901 | #273 | 118 | — | |
| 1900 | #300 | 121 | — | |
| 1899 | #289 | 103 | — | |
| 1898 | #312 | 101 | — | |
| 1897 | #281 | 102 | — | |
| 1896 | #299 | 95 | — | |
| 1895 | #314 | 86 | — | |
| 1894 | #307 | 81 | — | |
| 1893 | #291 | 86 | — | |
| 1892 | #295 | 84 | — | |
| 1891 | #296 | 71 | — | |
| 1890 | #337 | 57 | — | |
| 1889 | #321 | 58 | — | |
| 1888 | #296 | 63 | — | |
| 1887 | #283 | 57 | — | |
| 1886 | #294 | 49 | — | |
| 1885 | #283 | 49 | — | |
| 1884 | #268 | 53 | — | |
| 1883 | #386 | 23 | — | |
| 1882 | #278 | 40 | — | |
| 1881 | #312 | 26 | — | |
| 1880 | #250 | 39 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Rosalie was already there! It came in at #250, and was given to 39 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883, when fewer than 24 girls a year got the name.
Where Rosalie is popular in 1929
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maryland#80 · 1 in 322
- New York#105 · 1 in 506
- Connecticut#110 · 1 in 531
- Montana#112 · 1 in 422
- Rhode Island#112 · 1 in 491
Best ever in a state: #25 in Maryland, 1938.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #80 | 39 | 1 in 322 |
| New York | #105 | 191 | 1 in 506 |
| Connecticut | #110 | 21 | 1 in 531 |
| Montana | #112 | 9 | 1 in 422 |
| Rhode Island | #112 | 10 | 1 in 491 |
| Kansas | #118 | 29 | 1 in 483 |
| Nebraska | #118 | 20 | 1 in 530 |
| New Jersey | #118 | 50 | 1 in 583 |
| Missouri | #125 | 54 | 1 in 512 |
| Oregon | #125 | 9 | 1 in 574 |
| District of Columbia | #126 | 5 | 1 in 684 |
| Indiana | #126 | 35 | 1 in 705 |
| New Hampshire | #128 | 5 | 1 in 623 |
| Illinois | #129 | 81 | 1 in 704 |
| Massachusetts | #136 | 35 | 1 in 900 |
| Michigan | #138 | 50 | 1 in 841 |
| Colorado | #144 | 13 | 1 in 638 |
| Pennsylvania | #147 | 90 | 1 in 921 |
| Wisconsin | #148 | 24 | 1 in 989 |
| Maine | #152 | 9 | 1 in 702 |
| California | #153 | 51 | 1 in 701 |
| West Virginia | #156 | 27 | 1 in 673 |
| Iowa | #165 | 17 | 1 in 1,090 |
| Washington | #165 | 10 | 1 in 913 |
| Louisiana | #172 | 29 | 1 in 739 |
| Minnesota | #175 | 16 | 1 in 1,200 |
| New Mexico | #178 | 6 | 1 in 687 |
| Oklahoma | #199 | 23 | 1 in 991 |
| Ohio | #200 | 35 | 1 in 1,468 |
| South Carolina | #213 | 14 | 1 in 1,385 |
| Virginia | #237 | 14 | 1 in 1,696 |
| Florida | #250 | 8 | 1 in 1,534 |
| Texas | #258 | 48 | 1 in 1,257 |
| Mississippi | #302 | 10 | 1 in 2,148 |
| Arkansas | #310 | 9 | 1 in 2,028 |
| Georgia | #328 | 10 | 1 in 3,005 |
| Kentucky | #352 | 8 | 1 in 3,307 |
| North Carolina | #364 | 9 | 1 in 3,986 |
| Alabama | #365 | 9 | 1 in 3,336 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rosalie
- 6 spots since 2024 (#177 → #171)
- 27 spots since 2020 (#198 → #171)
- 95 spots since 2015 (#266 → #171)
- Biggest jump: 600 spots in 2009 (#1,431 → #831)
- Biggest drop: 139 spots in 1983 (#815 → #954)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1938 at #66 (3,758 births)
- Births halved by 1940, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 1938
- Top 1,000: 125 yrs · run 1880–1986
- Highest: 1 in 294 girls born in 1938 were named Rosalie (0.34%)
- Latest: 1 in 894 girls born in 2025 (0.11%)
- 16.3% of all girls named Rosalie (13,713) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #66 (1938) → #1,672 (2007) → #171 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 457 | #250 (1880) | #297 |
| 1890s | 866 | #281 (1897) | #302 |
| 1900s | 1,571 | #234 (1904) | #262 |
| 1910s | 6,305 | #197 (1915) | #215 |
| 1920s | 11,296 | #170 (1928) | #185 |
| 1930s | 13,713 | #66 (1938) | #169 |
| 1940s | 12,587 | #139 (1940) | #190 |
| 1950s | 6,790 | #259 (1950) | #333 |
| 1960s | 3,645 | #428 (1960) | #527 |
| 1970s | 1,679 | #778 (1973) | #833 |
| 1980s | 1,672 | #815 (1982) | #940 |
| 1990s | 1,405 | #1,097 (1991) | #1,250 |
| 2000s | 1,621 | #831 (2009) | #1,389 |
| 2010s | 10,535 | #208 (2019) | #337 |
| 2020s | 9,907 | #171 (2025) | #182 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rosalie in 1929
Top girls' names in 1929
Top boys' names in 1929
More about 1929
girls
1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 964 of them was named Rosalie, which outranked 96.7% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 179,269 of them was named Rosalie, which outranked 21.7% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,247Yates7
- #3,247Ysidoro7
- #3,247Zeke7
- #3,559Rosalie6
- #3,559Abdon6
- #3,559Achilles6
- #3,559Addis6
- #3,959Adolphe5
- #3,959Adren5
- #3,959Agustine5
Tied with 399 names at #3,559; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.