Roxanne
#1,309 for girls in 2025, 170 births · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #5,200
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1954 · 2,232 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 59,532since 1906
Roxanne over time
Rank among girls' names. Roxanne has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,309 | 170 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,275 | 182 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,310 | 173 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,371 | 169 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,175 | 208 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,120 | 215 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,180 | 199 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,262 | 183 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,248 | 190 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,284 | 188 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,311 | 181 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,164 | 211 | — | |
| 2013 | #988 | 253 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,035 | 245 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,019 | 245 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,051 | 236 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,017 | 258 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,104 | 234 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,196 | 211 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,173 | 207 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,061 | 225 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,043 | 222 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,146 | 189 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,077 | 197 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,127 | 186 | — | |
| 2000 | #946 | 225 | — | |
| 1999 | #896 | 237 | — | |
| 1998 | #831 | 256 | — | |
| 1997 | #783 | 266 | — | |
| 1996 | #671 | 330 | — | |
| 1995 | #638 | 341 | — | |
| 1994 | #598 | 376 | — | |
| 1993 | #527 | 459 | — | |
| 1992 | #431 | 585 | — | |
| 1991 | #403 | 634 | — | |
| 1990 | #336 | 803 | — | |
| 1989 | #277 | 975 | — | |
| 1988 | #218 | 1,191 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #250 | 1,021 | #3,959 | 11 |
| 1986 | #302 | 811 | — | |
| 1985 | #285 | 878 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #317 | 749 | — | |
| 1983 | #287 | 818 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #277 | 879 | — | |
| 1981 | #285 | 852 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #285 | 870 | — | |
| 1979 | #278 | 879 | — | |
| 1978 | #307 | 760 | — | |
| 1977 | #316 | 751 | — | |
| 1976 | #328 | 679 | — | |
| 1975 | #309 | 744 | — | |
| 1974 | #316 | 722 | — | |
| 1973 | #321 | 702 | — | |
| 1972 | #288 | 883 | — | |
| 1971 | #277 | 1,036 | — | |
| 1970 | #289 | 1,013 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #268 | 1,090 | — | |
| 1968 | #267 | 1,015 | — | |
| 1967 | #268 | 1,005 | — | |
| 1966 | #244 | 1,186 | — | |
| 1965 | #242 | 1,271 | — | |
| 1964 | #241 | 1,324 | — | |
| 1963 | #220 | 1,527 | — | |
| 1962 | #219 | 1,515 | — | |
| 1961 | #202 | 1,724 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #193 | 1,920 | — | |
| 1959 | #202 | 1,707 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #205 | 1,586 | — | |
| 1957 | #198 | 1,774 | — | |
| 1956 | #172 | 2,114 | #3,942 | 5 |
| 1955 | #165 | 2,092 | — | |
| 1954 | #158 | 2,232 | — | |
| 1953 | #178 | 1,763 | — | |
| 1952 | #187 | 1,578 | — | |
| 1951 | #234 | 1,080 | — | |
| 1950 | #296 | 682 | — | |
| 1949 | #436 | 331 | — | |
| 1948 | #471 | 290 | — | |
| 1947 | #502 | 270 | — | |
| 1946 | #517 | 232 | — | |
| 1945 | #515 | 198 | — | |
| 1944 | #547 | 175 | — | |
| 1943 | #565 | 179 | — | |
| 1942 | #720 | 107 | — | |
| 1941 | #661 | 115 | — | |
| 1940 | #732 | 90 | — | |
| 1939 | #862 | 66 | — | |
| 1938 | #899 | 62 | — | |
| 1937 | #940 | 54 | — | |
| 1936 | #941 | 53 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,331 | 30 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,440 | 26 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,513 | 24 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,597 | 23 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,105 | 15 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,708 | 12 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | — | |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,291 | 6 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Roxanne! It came in at #1,727, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1907–1917, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Roxanne is popular in 1956
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#47 · 1 in 217
- North Dakota#50 · 1 in 210
- Minnesota#67 · 1 in 273
- Nebraska#71 · 1 in 308
- Maine#79 · 1 in 285
Best ever in a state: #29 in Hawaii, 1955.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #47 | 29 | 1 in 217 |
| North Dakota | #50 | 32 | 1 in 210 |
| Minnesota | #67 | 136 | 1 in 273 |
| Nebraska | #71 | 47 | 1 in 308 |
| Maine | #79 | 34 | 1 in 285 |
| Wisconsin | #91 | 97 | 1 in 433 |
| South Dakota | #92 | 21 | 1 in 355 |
| Delaware | #96 | 12 | 1 in 371 |
| Wyoming | #98 | 8 | 1 in 367 |
| Iowa | #103 | 65 | 1 in 435 |
| New Hampshire | #105 | 13 | 1 in 412 |
| Idaho | #111 | 15 | 1 in 418 |
| Montana | #118 | 15 | 1 in 457 |
| Connecticut | #122 | 41 | 1 in 574 |
| Maryland | #123 | 51 | 1 in 578 |
| Michigan | #127 | 148 | 1 in 635 |
| Vermont | #127 | 7 | 1 in 496 |
| Rhode Island | #137 | 10 | 1 in 840 |
| Pennsylvania | #142 | 168 | 1 in 689 |
| New York | #151 | 210 | 1 in 785 |
| Indiana | #153 | 65 | 1 in 777 |
| California | #159 | 198 | 1 in 790 |
| Washington | #164 | 38 | 1 in 754 |
| Colorado | #167 | 25 | 1 in 750 |
| Oregon | #169 | 20 | 1 in 806 |
| Kansas | #172 | 24 | 1 in 918 |
| New Jersey | #176 | 52 | 1 in 1,060 |
| Illinois | #182 | 95 | 1 in 1,104 |
| Utah | #190 | 12 | 1 in 878 |
| Louisiana | #195 | 41 | 1 in 960 |
| District of Columbia | #199 | 12 | 1 in 1,127 |
| West Virginia | #203 | 15 | 1 in 1,327 |
| Florida | #213 | 35 | 1 in 1,228 |
| Massachusetts | #216 | 25 | 1 in 2,074 |
| Ohio | #220 | 69 | 1 in 1,556 |
| Missouri | #224 | 26 | 1 in 1,723 |
| New Mexico | #239 | 10 | 1 in 1,098 |
| Virginia | #267 | 21 | 1 in 1,968 |
| Arizona | #274 | 9 | 1 in 1,435 |
| Kentucky | #285 | 14 | 1 in 2,396 |
| Texas | #293 | 62 | 1 in 1,852 |
| Alabama | #298 | 18 | 1 in 2,036 |
| Oklahoma | #328 | 9 | 1 in 2,477 |
| Georgia | #333 | 17 | 1 in 2,747 |
| North Carolina | #371 | 15 | 1 in 3,452 |
| South Carolina | #385 | 9 | 1 in 3,214 |
| Mississippi | #509 | 5 | 1 in 5,359 |
| Tennessee | #513 | 6 | 1 in 6,400 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roxanne
- 34 spots since 2024 (#1,275 → #1,309)
- 189 spots since 2020 (#1,120 → #1,309)
- 2 spots since 2015 (#1,311 → #1,309)
- Biggest jump: 390 spots in 1936 (#1,331 → #941)
- Biggest drop: 181 spots in 2001 (#946 → #1,127)
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1954 at #158 (2,232 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 66 yrs · run 1936–2000
- Highest: 1 in 870 girls born in 1954 were named Roxanne (0.11%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,455 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 27.9% of all girls named Roxanne (16,608) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | #1,727 (1906) | #1,727 |
| 1910s | 18 | #3,187 (1913) | #3,765 |
| 1920s | 71 | #2,708 (1926) | #3,406 |
| 1930s | 363 | #862 (1939) | #1,447 |
| 1940s | 1,987 | #436 (1949) | #567 |
| 1950s | 16,608 | #158 (1954) | #200 |
| 1960s | 13,577 | #193 (1960) | #236 |
| 1970s | 8,169 | #277 (1971) | #303 |
| 1980s | 9,044 | #218 (1988) | #278 |
| 1990s | 4,287 | #336 (1990) | #611 |
| 2000s | 2,154 | #946 (2000) | #1,089 |
| 2010s | 2,131 | #988 (2013) | #1,154 |
| 2020s | 1,117 | #1,120 (2020) | #1,260 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roxanne in 1956
Top girls' names in 1956
Top boys' names in 1956
More about 1956
girls
2,007,703 girls got a published name in 1956; 1 in 950 of them was named Roxanne, which outranked 97.5% of the 6,891 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 423,060 of them was named Roxanne, which outranked 11.5% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 513 names at #3,942; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.