Shaquita
Last seen for girls in 2005 at #16,462 · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1986 · 178 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,391since 1970
Shaquita over time
Rank among girls' names. Shaquita has never cracked the top 900 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | — | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | — | |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | — | |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | — | |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 | — | |
| 1999 | #5,039 | 21 | — | |
| 1998 | #4,492 | 24 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,007 | 27 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,630 | 47 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,006 | 68 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,634 | 92 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,228 | 141 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,254 | 138 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,077 | 168 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,066 | 166 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,060 | 160 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #1,092 | 144 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,033 | 150 | — | |
| 1986 | #906 | 178 | — | |
| 1985 | #907 | 174 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,021 | 139 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,159 | 114 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,965 | 53 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,085 | 49 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,735 | 64 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,998 | 51 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,191 | 42 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,002 | 26 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,728 | 28 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,232 | 37 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,008 | 23 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Shaquita! It came in at #7,995, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1970–1971, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Shaquita is popular in 1990
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#240 · 1 in 929
- Georgia#320 · 1 in 2,133
- North Carolina#354 · 1 in 2,554
- Virginia#424 · 1 in 3,149
- Tennessee#450 · 1 in 3,355
Best ever in a state: #147 in Mississippi, 1986.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #240 | 5 | 1 in 929 |
| Georgia | #320 | 20 | 1 in 2,133 |
| North Carolina | #354 | 16 | 1 in 2,554 |
| Virginia | #424 | 12 | 1 in 3,149 |
| Tennessee | #450 | 9 | 1 in 3,355 |
| Mississippi | #460 | 5 | 1 in 2,755 |
| Alabama | #461 | 7 | 1 in 3,211 |
| South Carolina | #494 | 6 | 1 in 3,339 |
| Illinois | #572 | 18 | 1 in 4,362 |
| Louisiana | #622 | 6 | 1 in 4,230 |
| Florida | #687 | 14 | 1 in 5,652 |
| Texas | #1,257 | 11 | 1 in 12,508 |
| New York | #1,974 | 5 | 1 in 24,411 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Shaquita
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2005
- Biggest jump: 114 spots in 1985 (#1,021 → #907)
- Biggest drop: 127 spots in 1987 (#906 → #1,033)
- Debuted 1970
- Peaked 1986 at #906 (178 births)
- Births halved by 1995, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 1985–1986
- Highest: 1 in 9,638 girls born in 1986 were named Shaquita (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 369,568 girls born in 2005 (0.00%)
- 51.2% of all girls named Shaquita (1,225) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 226 | #1,998 (1979) | #4,058 |
| 1980s | 1,225 | #906 (1986) | #1,296 |
| 1990s | 892 | #1,066 (1990) | #2,443 |
| 2000s | 48 | #7,580 (2000) | #12,460 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Shaquita in 1990
Top girls' names in 1990
More about 1990
girls
1,898,547 girls got a published name in 1990; 1 in 11,437 of them was named Shaquita, which outranked 93.0% of the 15,234 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,063Adilene167
- #1,063Denisha167
- #1,063Scarlett167
- #1,066Shaquita166
- #1,066Brandee166
- #1,066Brielle166
- #1,066Joshua166
- #1,072Casie165
- #1,072Cheyanne165
- #1,072Leigha165
Tied with 5 names at #1,066; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.