Sterling
#1,098 for girls in 2025, 218 births · #345 for boys in 2025, 944 births
Given to boys 91.0% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1895 · 35 births
- Debut · boys
- 17 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 37,474since 1880
Sterling over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,098 | 218 | #345 | 944 |
| 2024 | #1,114 | 219 | #370 | 885 |
| 2023 | #1,273 | 180 | #403 | 792 |
| 2022 | #1,362 | 171 | #397 | 803 |
| 2021 | #1,273 | 182 | #382 | 844 |
| 2020 | #1,678 | 122 | #399 | 768 |
| 2019 | #1,773 | 115 | #410 | 753 |
| 2018 | #1,663 | 126 | #409 | 783 |
| 2017 | #1,686 | 127 | #433 | 713 |
| 2016 | #1,636 | 133 | #458 | 671 |
| 2015 | #2,209 | 85 | #493 | 595 |
| 2014 | #2,027 | 97 | #507 | 552 |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | #582 | 441 |
| 2012 | #2,708 | 65 | #675 | 350 |
| 2011 | #2,725 | 64 | #737 | 307 |
| 2010 | #3,159 | 52 | #755 | 299 |
| 2009 | #3,460 | 47 | #898 | 231 |
| 2008 | #3,584 | 45 | #866 | 245 |
| 2007 | #3,848 | 41 | #800 | 269 |
| 2006 | #3,054 | 55 | #769 | 270 |
| 2005 | #3,730 | 39 | #742 | 272 |
| 2004 | #2,620 | 63 | #675 | 300 |
| 2003 | #2,840 | 54 | #631 | 325 |
| 2002 | #2,158 | 77 | #589 | 357 |
| 2001 | #2,700 | 55 | #545 | 395 |
| 2000 | #2,174 | 73 | #567 | 363 |
| 1999 | #2,567 | 55 | #528 | 392 |
| 1998 | #2,164 | 66 | #505 | 424 |
| 1997 | #2,874 | 42 | #493 | 428 |
| 1996 | #2,207 | 61 | #462 | 469 |
| 1995 | #2,421 | 53 | #446 | 511 |
| 1994 | #1,972 | 71 | #402 | 573 |
| 1993 | #1,865 | 76 | #437 | 504 |
| 1992 | #2,351 | 55 | #438 | 503 |
| 1991 | #2,519 | 49 | #463 | 454 |
| 1990 | #2,799 | 41 | #463 | 451 |
| 1989 | #3,165 | 33 | #486 | 389 |
| 1988 | #2,539 | 42 | #443 | 415 |
| 1987 | #2,972 | 32 | #490 | 326 |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 | #512 | 297 |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | #527 | 275 |
| 1984 | #3,527 | 23 | #490 | 293 |
| 1983 | #3,242 | 25 | #507 | 276 |
| 1982 | #3,898 | 20 | #559 | 237 |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 | #579 | 218 |
| 1980 | #4,517 | 16 | #548 | 242 |
| 1979 | #4,052 | 18 | #571 | 225 |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 | #555 | 226 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #573 | 214 |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | #591 | 189 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #596 | 183 |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | #575 | 195 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #570 | 194 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #589 | 183 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #522 | 242 |
| 1970 | #4,038 | 14 | #546 | 221 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #508 | 234 |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | #483 | 246 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #511 | 216 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #490 | 239 |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #522 | 215 |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #470 | 284 |
| 1963 | — | #464 | 288 | |
| 1962 | — | #470 | 288 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #504 | 249 |
| 1960 | — | #515 | 237 | |
| 1959 | — | #487 | 259 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #496 | 245 |
| 1957 | — | #497 | 246 | |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #455 | 279 |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | #455 | 267 |
| 1954 | — | #457 | 252 | |
| 1953 | — | #449 | 255 | |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #440 | 255 |
| 1951 | — | #420 | 260 | |
| 1950 | — | #421 | 252 | |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #422 | 260 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #419 | 255 |
| 1947 | — | #409 | 281 | |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | #417 | 232 |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #409 | 216 |
| 1944 | — | #416 | 211 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #422 | 217 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #377 | 258 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #413 | 200 |
| 1940 | — | #402 | 204 | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #428 | 177 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | #414 | 188 |
| 1937 | — | #439 | 166 | |
| 1936 | — | #392 | 194 | |
| 1935 | — | #411 | 179 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #405 | 186 |
| 1933 | — | #397 | 186 | |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | #369 | 227 |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | #404 | 193 |
| 1930 | — | #402 | 208 | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | #356 | 250 |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | #392 | 229 |
| 1927 | #4,286 | 6 | #385 | 236 |
| 1926 | — | #371 | 246 | |
| 1925 | — | #384 | 241 | |
| 1924 | — | #356 | 280 | |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 | #376 | 253 |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 | #364 | 270 |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | #372 | 269 |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | #373 | 259 |
| 1919 | — | #361 | 254 | |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #376 | 249 |
| 1917 | — | #383 | 218 | |
| 1916 | — | #390 | 202 | |
| 1915 | — | #372 | 209 | |
| 1914 | — | #385 | 151 | |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #362 | 132 |
| 1912 | — | #384 | 100 | |
| 1911 | — | #420 | 47 | |
| 1910 | — | #383 | 46 | |
| 1909 | — | #339 | 47 | |
| 1908 | — | #341 | 44 | |
| 1907 | — | #351 | 39 | |
| 1906 | — | #378 | 32 | |
| 1905 | — | #384 | 30 | |
| 1904 | — | #351 | 33 | |
| 1903 | — | #346 | 31 | |
| 1902 | — | #360 | 30 | |
| 1901 | — | #347 | 28 | |
| 1900 | — | #354 | 38 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #385 | 26 | |
| 1897 | — | #375 | 25 | |
| 1896 | — | #424 | 21 | |
| 1895 | — | #305 | 35 | |
| 1894 | — | #521 | 15 | |
| 1893 | — | #317 | 30 | |
| 1892 | — | #394 | 23 | |
| 1891 | — | #340 | 25 | |
| 1890 | — | #489 | 15 | |
| 1889 | — | #482 | 15 | |
| 1888 | — | #369 | 25 | |
| 1887 | — | #377 | 19 | |
| 1886 | — | #605 | 10 | |
| 1885 | — | #422 | 18 | |
| 1884 | — | #399 | 20 | |
| 1883 | — | #381 | 20 | |
| 1882 | — | #453 | 16 | |
| 1881 | — | #653 | 8 | |
| 1880 | — | #425 | 17 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Sterling was already there! It came in at #425, and was given to 17 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
Where Sterling is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alaska#170 · 1 in 575
- Utah#334 · 1 in 1,576
- Idaho#391 · 1 in 1,679
- Wisconsin#415 · 1 in 2,524
- Colorado#443 · 1 in 2,500
Best ever in a state: #69 in District of Columbia, 1915.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | #170 | 6 | 1 in 575 |
| Utah | #334 | 14 | 1 in 1,576 |
| Idaho | #391 | 5 | 1 in 1,679 |
| Wisconsin | #415 | 11 | 1 in 2,524 |
| Colorado | #443 | 11 | 1 in 2,500 |
| South Carolina | #512 | 7 | 1 in 3,007 |
| Oregon | #517 | 6 | 1 in 3,053 |
| Oklahoma | #523 | 7 | 1 in 2,939 |
| Washington | #528 | 11 | 1 in 3,234 |
| Florida | #545 | 25 | 1 in 3,706 |
| North Carolina | #589 | 12 | 1 in 4,297 |
| Michigan | #621 | 11 | 1 in 4,381 |
| Missouri | #635 | 7 | 1 in 4,667 |
| Maryland | #654 | 6 | 1 in 4,700 |
| Texas | #668 | 34 | 1 in 5,253 |
| Virginia | #695 | 8 | 1 in 5,195 |
| California | #733 | 34 | 1 in 6,876 |
| Tennessee | #841 | 5 | 1 in 7,031 |
| Indiana | #856 | 5 | 1 in 7,230 |
| Arizona | #863 | 5 | 1 in 7,457 |
| Ohio | #908 | 7 | 1 in 8,647 |
| Georgia | #976 | 7 | 1 in 7,984 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Sterling
- 25 spots since 2024 (#370 → #345)
- 54 spots since 2020 (#399 → #345)
- 148 spots since 2015 (#493 → #345)
- Biggest jump: 228 spots in 1887 (#605 → #377)
- Biggest drop: 228 spots in 1881 (#425 → #653)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1895 at #305 (35 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,809 boys born in 2025 were named Sterling (0.06%)
- Its best rank, #305 in 1895, was only 1 in 3,354 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 14.6% of all boys named Sterling (5,464) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 168 | #369 (1888) | #457 |
| 1890s | 233 | #305 (1895) | #399 |
| 1900s | 352 | #339 (1909) | #355 |
| 1910s | 1,608 | #361 (1919) | #382 |
| 1920s | 2,533 | #356 (1924) | #373 |
| 1930s | 1,904 | #369 (1932) | #406 |
| 1940s | 2,334 | #377 (1942) | #411 |
| 1950s | 2,570 | #420 (1951) | #458 |
| 1960s | 2,496 | #464 (1963) | #494 |
| 1970s | 2,072 | #522 (1971) | #569 |
| 1980s | 2,968 | #443 (1988) | #514 |
| 1990s | 4,709 | #402 (1994) | #464 |
| 2000s | 3,027 | #545 (2001) | #708 |
| 2010s | 5,464 | #409 (2018) | #546 |
| 2020s | 5,036 | #345 (2025) | #383 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Sterling in 2010
Top girls' names in 2010
Top boys' names in 2010
More about 2010
girls
1,777,595 girls got a published name in 2010; 1 in 34,185 of them was named Sterling, which outranked 84.1% of the 19,841 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,123Taylen53
- #3,123Trina53
- #3,123Zahira53
- #3,159Sterling52
- #3,159Abbagail52
- #3,159Abilene52
- #3,159Aliviah52
- #3,203Adelia51
- #3,203Adleigh51
- #3,203Akasha51
Tied with 43 names at #3,159; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,918,676 boys got a published name in 2010; 1 in 6,417 of them was named Sterling, which outranked 94.7% of the 14,270 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.