Steve
Last seen for girls in 1998 at #14,122 · #1,609 for boys in 2025, 105 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1959 · 11,068 births
- Debut · boys
- 52 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 27 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 241,224since 1880
Steve over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,609 | 105 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,685 | 99 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,539 | 114 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,479 | 122 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,365 | 135 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,250 | 148 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,202 | 159 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,151 | 167 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,056 | 189 | |
| 2016 | — | #993 | 205 | |
| 2015 | — | #939 | 224 | |
| 2014 | — | #863 | 256 | |
| 2013 | — | #872 | 242 | |
| 2012 | — | #754 | 303 | |
| 2011 | — | #707 | 324 | |
| 2010 | — | #785 | 279 | |
| 2009 | — | #611 | 415 | |
| 2008 | — | #595 | 422 | |
| 2007 | — | #573 | 448 | |
| 2006 | — | #535 | 472 | |
| 2005 | — | #518 | 475 | |
| 2004 | — | #505 | 484 | |
| 2003 | — | #443 | 563 | |
| 2002 | — | #451 | 545 | |
| 2001 | — | #401 | 624 | |
| 2000 | — | #393 | 649 | |
| 1999 | — | #390 | 660 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #390 | 635 |
| 1997 | — | #386 | 627 | |
| 1996 | — | #369 | 648 | |
| 1995 | — | #334 | 754 | |
| 1994 | — | #345 | 714 | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #319 | 831 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #303 | 882 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #290 | 896 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #267 | 1,007 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #255 | 997 |
| 1988 | #4,015 | 22 | #248 | 949 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #233 | 1,004 |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | #235 | 989 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #234 | 990 |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #218 | 1,042 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #215 | 1,063 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #229 | 1,024 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #220 | 1,116 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #201 | 1,218 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #193 | 1,254 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #193 | 1,236 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #182 | 1,270 |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | #167 | 1,407 |
| 1975 | #3,950 | 16 | #170 | 1,383 |
| 1974 | #4,720 | 12 | #167 | 1,443 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #160 | 1,511 |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | #143 | 1,845 |
| 1971 | #4,123 | 14 | #131 | 2,373 |
| 1970 | #3,872 | 15 | #114 | 2,930 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #98 | 3,062 |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 | #89 | 3,408 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #79 | 3,909 |
| 1966 | #2,308 | 27 | #67 | 4,617 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #55 | 5,685 |
| 1964 | #3,108 | 17 | #51 | 7,092 |
| 1963 | #2,252 | 28 | #49 | 8,050 |
| 1962 | #2,463 | 24 | #46 | 9,154 |
| 1961 | #2,359 | 26 | #45 | 9,997 |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | #43 | 10,645 |
| 1959 | #2,191 | 27 | #41 | 11,068 |
| 1958 | #2,025 | 30 | #44 | 10,079 |
| 1957 | #1,842 | 35 | #44 | 8,910 |
| 1956 | #2,194 | 25 | #59 | 6,472 |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | #72 | 5,509 |
| 1954 | #2,695 | 17 | #76 | 5,062 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #84 | 4,539 |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | #85 | 4,313 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #86 | 4,053 |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | #83 | 4,207 |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 | #68 | 5,027 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | #60 | 5,742 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #58 | 6,231 |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 | #69 | 4,570 |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | #79 | 3,384 |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | #89 | 2,836 |
| 1943 | #2,861 | 11 | #93 | 2,684 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #102 | 2,376 |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | #112 | 1,881 |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | #121 | 1,555 |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #139 | 1,208 |
| 1938 | — | #149 | 1,077 | |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | #172 | 846 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #178 | 741 |
| 1935 | — | #176 | 773 | |
| 1934 | — | #176 | 771 | |
| 1933 | — | #178 | 728 | |
| 1932 | — | #177 | 780 | |
| 1931 | #3,226 | 8 | #173 | 786 |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | #169 | 862 |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | #162 | 887 |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | #162 | 925 |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 | #154 | 1,027 |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #151 | 1,052 |
| 1925 | #4,028 | 7 | #144 | 1,145 |
| 1924 | #3,665 | 8 | #139 | 1,219 |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | #133 | 1,255 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | #130 | 1,269 |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | #130 | 1,294 |
| 1920 | — | #127 | 1,281 | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #125 | 1,294 |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #109 | 1,523 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #112 | 1,385 |
| 1916 | — | #108 | 1,399 | |
| 1915 | — | #110 | 1,335 | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #112 | 998 |
| 1913 | — | #121 | 661 | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #123 | 543 |
| 1911 | — | #133 | 255 | |
| 1910 | — | #135 | 245 | |
| 1909 | — | #140 | 187 | |
| 1908 | — | #161 | 149 | |
| 1907 | — | #147 | 157 | |
| 1906 | — | #153 | 131 | |
| 1905 | — | #160 | 126 | |
| 1904 | — | #156 | 123 | |
| 1903 | — | #147 | 127 | |
| 1902 | — | #181 | 92 | |
| 1901 | — | #192 | 76 | |
| 1900 | — | #150 | 139 | |
| 1899 | — | #180 | 78 | |
| 1898 | — | #179 | 87 | |
| 1897 | — | #192 | 79 | |
| 1896 | — | #171 | 94 | |
| 1895 | — | #203 | 71 | |
| 1894 | — | #184 | 80 | |
| 1893 | — | #197 | 73 | |
| 1892 | — | #213 | 68 | |
| 1891 | — | #211 | 56 | |
| 1890 | — | #201 | 66 | |
| 1889 | — | #203 | 64 | |
| 1888 | — | #177 | 83 | |
| 1887 | — | #210 | 54 | |
| 1886 | — | #192 | 70 | |
| 1885 | — | #204 | 60 | |
| 1884 | — | #202 | 66 | |
| 1883 | — | #190 | 62 | |
| 1882 | — | #203 | 63 | |
| 1881 | — | #229 | 44 | |
| 1880 | — | #225 | 52 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Steve was already there! It came in at #225, and was given to 52 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 67 boys a year got the name.
Where Steve is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wyoming#24 · 1 in 97
- Oregon#27 · 1 in 115
- Alaska#27 · 1 in 122
- New Mexico#28 · 1 in 140
- Washington#30 · 1 in 127
Best ever in a state: #19 in Idaho, 1947.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #24 | 34 | 1 in 97 |
| Alaska | #27 | 26 | 1 in 122 |
| Oregon | #27 | 150 | 1 in 115 |
| New Mexico | #28 | 95 | 1 in 140 |
| California | #30 | 1,288 | 1 in 145 |
| Washington | #30 | 240 | 1 in 127 |
| Arizona | #31 | 124 | 1 in 136 |
| Oklahoma | #31 | 183 | 1 in 129 |
| Colorado | #32 | 149 | 1 in 145 |
| Montana | #32 | 56 | 1 in 132 |
| Nevada | #32 | 26 | 1 in 130 |
| Idaho | #33 | 53 | 1 in 132 |
| Utah | #37 | 72 | 1 in 168 |
| Kansas | #38 | 144 | 1 in 153 |
| Arkansas | #39 | 131 | 1 in 149 |
| Missouri | #39 | 283 | 1 in 164 |
| Illinois | #41 | 560 | 1 in 197 |
| Minnesota | #41 | 242 | 1 in 167 |
| Nebraska | #41 | 93 | 1 in 174 |
| South Dakota | #41 | 52 | 1 in 148 |
| Tennessee | #42 | 229 | 1 in 169 |
| Indiana | #43 | 277 | 1 in 189 |
| Wisconsin | #43 | 242 | 1 in 188 |
| Florida | #44 | 248 | 1 in 218 |
| Michigan | #44 | 465 | 1 in 190 |
| Ohio | #46 | 515 | 1 in 205 |
| Texas | #46 | 528 | 1 in 226 |
| Iowa | #47 | 150 | 1 in 194 |
| Kentucky | #47 | 173 | 1 in 197 |
| Georgia | #48 | 225 | 1 in 208 |
| Delaware | #50 | 18 | 1 in 275 |
| South Carolina | #50 | 124 | 1 in 220 |
| North Carolina | #52 | 217 | 1 in 237 |
| Virginia | #52 | 169 | 1 in 256 |
| Alabama | #56 | 161 | 1 in 226 |
| West Virginia | #57 | 65 | 1 in 272 |
| District of Columbia | #59 | 46 | 1 in 315 |
| Mississippi | #60 | 108 | 1 in 249 |
| North Dakota | #60 | 28 | 1 in 245 |
| Rhode Island | #62 | 21 | 1 in 414 |
| Vermont | #65 | 13 | 1 in 296 |
| Maine | #67 | 34 | 1 in 315 |
| Maryland | #67 | 93 | 1 in 341 |
| Massachusetts | #74 | 95 | 1 in 587 |
| Pennsylvania | #75 | 257 | 1 in 432 |
| New Jersey | #77 | 122 | 1 in 504 |
| Louisiana | #79 | 128 | 1 in 316 |
| New York | #81 | 340 | 1 in 514 |
| New Hampshire | #88 | 11 | 1 in 556 |
| Connecticut | #99 | 37 | 1 in 702 |
| Hawaii | #135 | 14 | 1 in 540 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Steve
- 76 spots since 2024 (#1,685 → #1,609)
- 359 spots since 2020 (#1,250 → #1,609)
- 670 spots since 2015 (#939 → #1,609)
- Biggest jump: 78 spots in 2011 (#785 → #707)
- Biggest drop: 174 spots in 2010 (#611 → #785)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1959 at #41 (11,068 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 27 yrs · run 1943–1969
- Top 1,000: 137 yrs · run 1880–2016
- Highest: 1 in 193 boys born in 1959 were named Steve (0.52%)
- Latest: 1 in 16,267 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 27.2% of all boys named Steve (65,619) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 618 | #177 (1888) | #204 |
| 1890s | 752 | #171 (1896) | #193 |
| 1900s | 1,307 | #140 (1909) | #159 |
| 1910s | 9,638 | #108 (1916) | #119 |
| 1920s | 11,354 | #127 (1920) | #143 |
| 1930s | 8,572 | #139 (1939) | #169 |
| 1940s | 36,286 | #58 (1947) | #85 |
| 1950s | 64,212 | #41 (1959) | #67 |
| 1960s | 65,619 | #43 (1960) | #62 |
| 1970s | 16,652 | #114 (1970) | #162 |
| 1980s | 10,392 | #201 (1980) | #229 |
| 1990s | 7,654 | #267 (1990) | #339 |
| 2000s | 5,097 | #393 (2000) | #503 |
| 2010s | 2,348 | #707 (2011) | #932 |
| 2020s | 723 | #1,250 (2020) | #1,488 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Steve in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 81,942 of them was named Steve, which outranked 67.5% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,414Vada25
- #2,414Verda25
- #2,414Veta25
- #2,463Steve24
- #2,463Adrianna24
- #2,463Alba24
- #2,463Albert24
- #2,539Adair23
- #2,539Alise23
- #2,539Apryl23
Tied with 75 names at #2,463; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 226 of them was named Steve, which outranked 99.0% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.