Suzanne
#2,387 for girls in 2025, 75 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,229
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1946 · 5,948 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 219,309since 1880
Suzanne over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,387 | 75 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,533 | 70 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,674 | 65 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,995 | 55 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,037 | 54 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,498 | 43 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,130 | 51 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,004 | 54 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,432 | 74 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,617 | 67 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,351 | 78 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,371 | 77 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,032 | 95 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,189 | 86 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,614 | 68 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,202 | 88 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,375 | 81 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,854 | 115 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,770 | 121 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,691 | 124 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,645 | 121 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,436 | 143 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,267 | 165 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,165 | 176 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,050 | 204 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,019 | 207 | — | |
| 1999 | #948 | 219 | — | |
| 1998 | #835 | 255 | — | |
| 1997 | #773 | 271 | — | |
| 1996 | #667 | 333 | — | |
| 1995 | #631 | 345 | — | |
| 1994 | #560 | 424 | — | |
| 1993 | #521 | 469 | — | |
| 1992 | #442 | 570 | — | |
| 1991 | #396 | 646 | — | |
| 1990 | #370 | 716 | — | |
| 1989 | #309 | 836 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #279 | 891 | — | |
| 1987 | #266 | 948 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #255 | 1,009 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #235 | 1,099 | — | |
| 1984 | #205 | 1,293 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | #189 | 1,403 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #174 | 1,626 | #5,003 | 7 |
| 1981 | #161 | 1,776 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #139 | 2,103 | #3,838 | 10 |
| 1979 | #127 | 2,245 | #4,068 | 9 |
| 1978 | #117 | 2,507 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #121 | 2,373 | #3,203 | 12 |
| 1976 | #126 | 2,200 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #121 | 2,319 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #111 | 2,697 | #4,634 | 6 |
| 1973 | #98 | 3,036 | #2,857 | 12 |
| 1972 | #92 | 3,300 | #2,819 | 12 |
| 1971 | #88 | 3,932 | #2,464 | 15 |
| 1970 | #87 | 4,425 | #3,282 | 9 |
| 1969 | #75 | 4,902 | #2,415 | 13 |
| 1968 | #69 | 5,040 | #1,962 | 17 |
| 1967 | #63 | 5,489 | #1,974 | 16 |
| 1966 | #62 | 5,684 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1965 | #65 | 5,912 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1964 | #67 | 6,485 | #2,546 | 11 |
| 1963 | #65 | 6,821 | #2,414 | 12 |
| 1962 | #65 | 6,851 | #2,035 | 16 |
| 1961 | #68 | 6,611 | #2,148 | 15 |
| 1960 | #78 | 5,966 | #2,871 | 9 |
| 1959 | #96 | 5,161 | #2,530 | 11 |
| 1958 | #104 | 4,637 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #102 | 4,660 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #94 | 5,024 | #2,628 | 10 |
| 1955 | #86 | 5,137 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #82 | 5,236 | #2,592 | 10 |
| 1953 | #78 | 5,472 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #84 | 4,909 | #2,514 | 10 |
| 1951 | #83 | 4,828 | #3,364 | 6 |
| 1950 | #71 | 5,266 | #2,321 | 11 |
| 1949 | #62 | 5,609 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #66 | 5,448 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #53 | 6,231 | #2,169 | 13 |
| 1946 | #52 | 5,948 | #2,403 | 10 |
| 1945 | #68 | 3,770 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #78 | 3,462 | #1,988 | 13 |
| 1943 | #86 | 3,280 | #1,764 | 17 |
| 1942 | #103 | 2,708 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #97 | 2,611 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #109 | 2,338 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #122 | 2,031 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #133 | 1,807 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1937 | #145 | 1,546 | — | |
| 1936 | #151 | 1,350 | — | |
| 1935 | #154 | 1,310 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #153 | 1,340 | — | |
| 1933 | #181 | 950 | — | |
| 1932 | #215 | 828 | — | |
| 1931 | #214 | 805 | — | |
| 1930 | #217 | 793 | — | |
| 1929 | #259 | 603 | — | |
| 1928 | #267 | 583 | — | |
| 1927 | #296 | 509 | — | |
| 1926 | #294 | 522 | — | |
| 1925 | #327 | 414 | — | |
| 1924 | #335 | 405 | — | |
| 1923 | #349 | 359 | — | |
| 1922 | #362 | 334 | — | |
| 1921 | #338 | 376 | — | |
| 1920 | #388 | 285 | — | |
| 1919 | #472 | 199 | — | |
| 1918 | #434 | 234 | — | |
| 1917 | #465 | 194 | — | |
| 1916 | #502 | 167 | — | |
| 1915 | #474 | 169 | — | |
| 1914 | #483 | 131 | — | |
| 1913 | #512 | 98 | — | |
| 1912 | #531 | 84 | — | |
| 1911 | #519 | 64 | — | |
| 1910 | #536 | 58 | — | |
| 1909 | #500 | 56 | — | |
| 1908 | #602 | 39 | — | |
| 1907 | #726 | 27 | — | |
| 1906 | #818 | 20 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #653 | 28 | — | |
| 1903 | #712 | 22 | — | |
| 1902 | #642 | 27 | — | |
| 1901 | #771 | 18 | — | |
| 1900 | #970 | 15 | — | |
| 1899 | #835 | 15 | — | |
| 1898 | #840 | 16 | — | |
| 1897 | #931 | 12 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,122 | 9 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | — | |
| 1894 | #812 | 14 | — | |
| 1893 | #955 | 10 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,099 | 7 | — | |
| 1889 | #802 | 11 | — | |
| 1888 | #837 | 10 | — | |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 | — | |
| 1886 | #993 | 6 | — | |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | — | |
| 1881 | #740 | 6 | — | |
| 1880 | #738 | 6 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Suzanne was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1885, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Suzanne is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wyoming#31 · 1 in 112
- New Hampshire#35 · 1 in 129
- Massachusetts#35 · 1 in 133
- New Jersey#39 · 1 in 178
- New York#40 · 1 in 192
Best ever in a state: #18 in Rhode Island, 1947.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #31 | 23 | 1 in 112 |
| Massachusetts | #35 | 387 | 1 in 133 |
| New Hampshire | #35 | 43 | 1 in 129 |
| New Jersey | #39 | 321 | 1 in 178 |
| New York | #40 | 850 | 1 in 192 |
| Connecticut | #45 | 133 | 1 in 178 |
| Delaware | #45 | 27 | 1 in 162 |
| Rhode Island | #45 | 45 | 1 in 174 |
| California | #47 | 795 | 1 in 218 |
| Pennsylvania | #49 | 506 | 1 in 206 |
| Nevada | #50 | 16 | 1 in 171 |
| Utah | #50 | 54 | 1 in 196 |
| Maine | #53 | 53 | 1 in 187 |
| District of Columbia | #55 | 60 | 1 in 218 |
| Michigan | #55 | 398 | 1 in 206 |
| Oregon | #58 | 66 | 1 in 233 |
| Florida | #59 | 190 | 1 in 259 |
| Washington | #59 | 111 | 1 in 250 |
| Vermont | #61 | 17 | 1 in 200 |
| Arizona | #63 | 58 | 1 in 266 |
| Minnesota | #65 | 151 | 1 in 251 |
| Alaska | #69 | 12 | 1 in 225 |
| Colorado | #71 | 67 | 1 in 286 |
| Maryland | #73 | 96 | 1 in 305 |
| Nebraska | #73 | 51 | 1 in 281 |
| Illinois | #74 | 341 | 1 in 302 |
| Iowa | #74 | 97 | 1 in 282 |
| Hawaii | #75 | 23 | 1 in 277 |
| Wisconsin | #75 | 151 | 1 in 280 |
| Virginia | #79 | 128 | 1 in 314 |
| Ohio | #82 | 309 | 1 in 319 |
| Indiana | #86 | 129 | 1 in 375 |
| Idaho | #93 | 18 | 1 in 335 |
| New Mexico | #94 | 38 | 1 in 303 |
| Missouri | #96 | 110 | 1 in 387 |
| Louisiana | #98 | 102 | 1 in 373 |
| Alabama | #100 | 75 | 1 in 445 |
| South Dakota | #103 | 17 | 1 in 394 |
| Texas | #106 | 242 | 1 in 457 |
| Georgia | #112 | 93 | 1 in 470 |
| South Carolina | #113 | 51 | 1 in 498 |
| Kansas | #114 | 43 | 1 in 461 |
| West Virginia | #119 | 31 | 1 in 520 |
| Kentucky | #121 | 57 | 1 in 541 |
| North Carolina | #126 | 84 | 1 in 568 |
| Montana | #128 | 14 | 1 in 444 |
| Tennessee | #128 | 57 | 1 in 625 |
| Mississippi | #132 | 40 | 1 in 618 |
| North Dakota | #137 | 13 | 1 in 476 |
| Oklahoma | #142 | 34 | 1 in 606 |
| Arkansas | #152 | 24 | 1 in 735 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Suzanne
- 146 spots since 2024 (#2,533 → #2,387)
- 1,111 spots since 2020 (#3,498 → #2,387)
- 36 spots since 2015 (#2,351 → #2,387)
- Biggest jump: 216 spots in 1893 (#1,171 → #955)
- Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1895 (#812 → #1,123)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1946 at #52 (5,948 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 28 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1959–1973
- Top 1,000: 112 yrs · run 1897–1999
- Highest: 1 in 264 girls born in 1946 were named Suzanne (0.38%)
- Latest: 1 in 21,430 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 27.2% of all girls named Suzanne (59,761) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 70 | #530 (1882) | #833 |
| 1890s | 104 | #812 (1894) | #1,022 |
| 1900s | 268 | #500 (1909) | #732 |
| 1910s | 1,398 | #434 (1918) | #493 |
| 1920s | 4,390 | #259 (1929) | #322 |
| 1930s | 12,760 | #122 (1939) | #169 |
| 1940s | 41,405 | #52 (1946) | #77 |
| 1950s | 50,330 | #71 (1950) | #88 |
| 1960s | 59,761 | #62 (1966) | #68 |
| 1970s | 29,034 | #87 (1970) | #109 |
| 1980s | 12,984 | #139 (1980) | #221 |
| 1990s | 4,248 | #370 (1990) | #614 |
| 2000s | 1,457 | #1,019 (2000) | #1,527 |
| 2010s | 738 | #2,032 (2013) | #2,494 |
| 2020s | 362 | #2,387 (2025) | #2,854 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Suzanne in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 287 of them was named Suzanne, which outranked 99.1% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 129,298 of them was named Suzanne, which outranked 56.1% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,962Waylon17
- #1,962Webb17
- #1,962Zackery17
- #2,035Suzanne16
- #2,035Acie16
- #2,035Adelbert16
- #2,035Adrien16
- #2,117Aris15
- #2,117Arno15
- #2,117Arsenio15
Tied with 81 names at #2,035; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.