Tamar
#2,438 for girls in 2025, 73 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #8,921
Given to girls 87.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1977 · 133 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 6,158since 1915
Tamar over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,438 | 73 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,362 | 77 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,517 | 70 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #2,510 | 71 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,608 | 66 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #2,779 | 59 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #2,729 | 62 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #2,508 | 70 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,635 | 66 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #2,247 | 85 | #7,157 | 11 |
| 2015 | #2,236 | 84 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #2,010 | 98 | #6,632 | 12 |
| 2013 | #1,866 | 108 | #5,404 | 16 |
| 2012 | #2,115 | 90 | #5,720 | 15 |
| 2011 | #2,274 | 82 | #4,983 | 18 |
| 2010 | #2,691 | 66 | #4,366 | 22 |
| 2009 | #2,614 | 70 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #2,184 | 91 | #3,921 | 26 |
| 2007 | #2,198 | 90 | #4,011 | 25 |
| 2006 | #2,248 | 85 | #5,072 | 17 |
| 2005 | #2,122 | 87 | #4,062 | 22 |
| 2004 | #2,067 | 88 | #4,129 | 21 |
| 2003 | #1,733 | 109 | #3,186 | 29 |
| 2002 | #1,750 | 103 | #3,909 | 21 |
| 2001 | #1,861 | 94 | #3,061 | 29 |
| 2000 | #1,744 | 100 | #2,298 | 42 |
| 1999 | #1,621 | 103 | #2,795 | 30 |
| 1998 | #1,762 | 89 | #2,599 | 32 |
| 1997 | #1,656 | 95 | #3,261 | 22 |
| 1996 | #1,656 | 92 | #3,549 | 19 |
| 1995 | #1,614 | 92 | #3,020 | 23 |
| 1994 | #1,744 | 84 | #3,469 | 19 |
| 1993 | #1,801 | 81 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #1,565 | 99 | #4,114 | 14 |
| 1991 | #1,752 | 82 | #3,224 | 19 |
| 1990 | #1,733 | 84 | #3,058 | 20 |
| 1989 | #1,414 | 105 | #3,618 | 15 |
| 1988 | #1,345 | 106 | #2,860 | 19 |
| 1987 | #1,446 | 90 | #2,468 | 22 |
| 1986 | #1,420 | 90 | #2,891 | 17 |
| 1985 | #1,149 | 124 | #2,828 | 17 |
| 1984 | #1,112 | 124 | #3,925 | 10 |
| 1983 | #1,090 | 126 | #2,493 | 19 |
| 1982 | #1,131 | 124 | #3,108 | 14 |
| 1981 | #1,145 | 119 | #2,569 | 18 |
| 1980 | #1,328 | 95 | #2,444 | 20 |
| 1979 | #1,051 | 132 | #2,777 | 16 |
| 1978 | #1,141 | 112 | #2,068 | 23 |
| 1977 | #1,009 | 133 | #2,665 | 16 |
| 1976 | #1,149 | 101 | #2,054 | 23 |
| 1975 | #1,219 | 94 | #2,540 | 16 |
| 1974 | #1,124 | 103 | #2,799 | 13 |
| 1973 | #1,169 | 93 | #4,054 | 7 |
| 1972 | #1,404 | 70 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #1,292 | 85 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,320 | 80 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #1,385 | 69 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,301 | 72 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,478 | 57 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,225 | 77 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,218 | 78 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,686 | 47 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,598 | 50 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,525 | 54 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,580 | 51 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,561 | 51 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,881 | 35 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,588 | 45 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,067 | 28 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,103 | 27 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,341 | 22 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,295 | 22 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,921 | 14 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,314 | 19 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,589 | 15 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 | — | |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | — | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | — | |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | — | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | — | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | — | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | — | |
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | — | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Tamar! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1915–1937, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Tamar is popular in 2006
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Jersey#672 · 1 in 4,071
- New York#855 · 1 in 5,363
- Illinois#1,489 · 1 in 11,357
- California#2,019 · 1 in 19,564
- Florida#2,023 · 1 in 17,824
Best ever in a state: #404 in New Jersey, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #672 | 10 | 1 in 4,071 |
| New York | #855 | 18 | 1 in 5,363 |
| Illinois | #1,489 | 6 | 1 in 11,357 |
| California | #2,019 | 12 | 1 in 19,564 |
| Florida | #2,023 | 5 | 1 in 17,824 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tamar
- 76 spots since 2024 (#2,362 → #2,438)
- 341 spots since 2020 (#2,779 → #2,438)
- 202 spots since 2015 (#2,236 → #2,438)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1977 at #1,009 (133 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 33 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 11,527 girls born in 1977 were named Tamar (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,017 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 17.9% of all girls named Tamar (1,103) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5 | #4,274 (1915) | #4,274 |
| 1920s | 10 | #4,570 (1929) | #4,769 |
| 1930s | 41 | #3,145 (1939) | #3,940 |
| 1940s | 96 | #2,410 (1949) | #3,383 |
| 1950s | 249 | #1,588 (1958) | #2,227 |
| 1960s | 606 | #1,218 (1965) | #1,456 |
| 1970s | 1,003 | #1,009 (1977) | #1,188 |
| 1980s | 1,103 | #1,090 (1983) | #1,258 |
| 1990s | 901 | #1,565 (1992) | #1,690 |
| 2000s | 917 | #1,733 (2003) | #2,052 |
| 2010s | 811 | #1,866 (2013) | #2,331 |
| 2020s | 416 | #2,362 (2024) | #2,536 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tamar in 2006
Top girls' names in 2006
Top boys' names in 2006
More about 2006
girls
1,901,209 girls got a published name in 2006; 1 in 22,367 of them was named Tamar, which outranked 88.8% of the 20,064 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,229Nechama86
- #2,229Raniyah86
- #2,229Shaylynn86
- #2,248Tamar85
- #2,248Alba85
- #2,248Anaiah85
- #2,248Angelena85
- #2,267Adalynn84
- #2,267Alisia84
- #2,267Anayah84
Tied with 18 names at #2,248; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 8,571Bethzy#9,452 → #881
- ↑ 1,747Rihanna#2,278 → #531
- ↑ 965Yaretzi#1,803 → #838
- ↑ 921Betsy#1,668 → #747
- ↑ 612Evangeline#1,210 → #598
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,055,273 boys got a published name in 2006; 1 in 120,898 of them was named Tamar, which outranked 63.9% of the 14,047 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #4,865Zaccheus18
- #4,865Zinedine18
- #4,865Zyquan18
- #5,072Tamar17
- #5,072Aadit17
- #5,072Aaiden17
- #5,072Abrar17
- #5,303Aadyn16
- #5,303Aarron16
- #5,303Abid16
Tied with 230 names at #5,072; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.