Tamika
Last seen for girls in 2022 at #15,306 · Last seen for boys in 1991 at #8,236
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1975 · 2,159 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 22,760since 1951
Tamika over time
Rank among girls' names. Tamika has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | — | |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | — | |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | — | |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | — | |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | — | |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #10,148 | 10 | — | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | — | |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | — | |
| 2012 | #9,711 | 11 | — | |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #6,382 | 20 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,317 | 21 | — | |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | — | |
| 2007 | #4,944 | 29 | — | |
| 2006 | #5,233 | 26 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,267 | 32 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,989 | 35 | — | |
| 2003 | #3,590 | 39 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,819 | 53 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,844 | 51 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,277 | 68 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,051 | 75 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,620 | 100 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,514 | 107 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,431 | 115 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,169 | 147 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,115 | 161 | — | |
| 1993 | #878 | 220 | — | |
| 1992 | #787 | 259 | — | |
| 1991 | #666 | 325 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #573 | 405 | #5,823 | 8 |
| 1989 | #574 | 381 | #3,809 | 14 |
| 1988 | #456 | 491 | — | |
| 1987 | #409 | 545 | — | |
| 1986 | #401 | 558 | — | |
| 1985 | #336 | 704 | — | |
| 1984 | #289 | 833 | — | |
| 1983 | #257 | 922 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #239 | 1,056 | — | |
| 1981 | #221 | 1,187 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #202 | 1,279 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #187 | 1,412 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #166 | 1,638 | #5,059 | 6 |
| 1977 | #158 | 1,695 | #4,164 | 8 |
| 1976 | #144 | 1,866 | #2,601 | 16 |
| 1975 | #130 | 2,159 | #3,246 | 11 |
| 1974 | #246 | 1,040 | — | |
| 1973 | #293 | 808 | — | |
| 1972 | #353 | 627 | — | |
| 1971 | #482 | 401 | — | |
| 1970 | #635 | 259 | — | |
| 1969 | #770 | 174 | — | |
| 1968 | #723 | 183 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,980 | 35 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,752 | 20 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,149 | 16 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,195 | 30 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,252 | 28 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Tamika! It came in at #5,414, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1951–1962, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Tamika is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#1,041 · 1 in 6,492
- Ohio#1,259 · 1 in 11,640
- New York#1,818 · 1 in 16,147
Best ever in a state: #20 in District of Columbia, 1975.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #1,041 | 5 | 1 in 6,492 |
| Ohio | #1,259 | 5 | 1 in 11,640 |
| New York | #1,818 | 6 | 1 in 16,147 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tamika
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
- Biggest jump: 1,257 spots in 1968 (#1,980 → #723)
- Biggest drop: 237 spots in 1994 (#878 → #1,115)
- Debuted 1951
- Peaked 1975 at #130 (2,159 births)
- Births halved by 1982, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 26 yrs · run 1968–1993
- Highest: 1 in 675 girls born in 1975 were named Tamika (0.15%)
- Latest: 1 in 328,026 girls born in 2022 (0.00%)
- 52.3% of all girls named Tamika (11,905) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 10 | #5,414 (1951) | #5,830 |
| 1960s | 486 | #723 (1968) | #1,974 |
| 1970s | 11,905 | #130 (1975) | #279 |
| 1980s | 7,956 | #202 (1980) | #338 |
| 1990s | 1,914 | #573 (1990) | #1,180 |
| 2000s | 373 | #2,277 (2000) | #4,308 |
| 2010s | 95 | #6,382 (2010) | #11,301 |
| 2020s | 21 | #8,953 (2020) | #13,170 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tamika in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 33,903 of them was named Tamika, which outranked 84.4% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,780Yoana54
- #2,780Zaire54
- #2,780Zulema54
- #2,819Tamika53
- #2,819Alexzandra53
- #2,819Amna53
- #2,819Arrianna53
- #2,854Ahtziri52
- #2,854Ajanae52
- #2,854Alix52
Tied with 34 names at #2,819; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.