Vickie
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #9,556 · Last seen for boys in 1972 at #4,986
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1956 · 6,957 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 10 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 110,046since 1907
Vickie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | — | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | — | |
| 2022 | #9,680 | 10 | — | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | — | |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | — | |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | — | |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | — | |
| 2016 | #12,876 | 7 | — | |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | — | |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | — | |
| 2013 | #6,729 | 18 | — | |
| 2012 | #8,208 | 14 | — | |
| 2011 | #6,855 | 18 | — | |
| 2010 | #8,271 | 14 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,434 | 26 | — | |
| 2007 | #6,812 | 19 | — | |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | — | |
| 2005 | #6,528 | 18 | — | |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,307 | 30 | — | |
| 2002 | #5,897 | 19 | — | |
| 2001 | #4,688 | 25 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,738 | 34 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,313 | 26 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,730 | 31 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,302 | 35 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,429 | 33 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,788 | 43 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,295 | 57 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,289 | 56 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,318 | 56 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,807 | 79 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,657 | 89 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,651 | 83 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,400 | 100 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,195 | 121 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,150 | 124 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,071 | 137 | — | |
| 1984 | #957 | 151 | — | |
| 1983 | #880 | 172 | — | |
| 1982 | #768 | 214 | — | |
| 1981 | #716 | 231 | — | |
| 1980 | #631 | 289 | — | |
| 1979 | #615 | 287 | — | |
| 1978 | #534 | 338 | — | |
| 1977 | #469 | 412 | — | |
| 1976 | #399 | 513 | — | |
| 1975 | #364 | 571 | — | |
| 1974 | #312 | 746 | — | |
| 1973 | #265 | 938 | — | |
| 1972 | #243 | 1,121 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #225 | 1,332 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #195 | 1,647 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #174 | 1,860 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #162 | 2,007 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #144 | 2,425 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #147 | 2,395 | #2,784 | 9 |
| 1965 | #138 | 2,784 | #2,780 | 9 |
| 1964 | #127 | 3,263 | #1,793 | 20 |
| 1963 | #120 | 3,636 | #1,695 | 22 |
| 1962 | #107 | 4,131 | #2,673 | 10 |
| 1961 | #107 | 4,408 | #1,876 | 19 |
| 1960 | #100 | 4,857 | #2,121 | 15 |
| 1959 | #90 | 5,419 | #2,111 | 15 |
| 1958 | #75 | 6,250 | #1,766 | 20 |
| 1957 | #70 | 6,845 | #1,673 | 23 |
| 1956 | #68 | 6,957 | #1,418 | 30 |
| 1955 | #68 | 6,637 | #2,048 | 15 |
| 1954 | #69 | 6,367 | #1,956 | 16 |
| 1953 | #79 | 5,297 | #2,038 | 15 |
| 1952 | #76 | 5,482 | #1,615 | 22 |
| 1951 | #87 | 4,320 | #2,055 | 14 |
| 1950 | #108 | 3,283 | #2,111 | 13 |
| 1949 | #124 | 2,562 | #1,872 | 16 |
| 1948 | #142 | 2,020 | #2,218 | 12 |
| 1947 | #169 | 1,706 | #2,169 | 13 |
| 1946 | #204 | 1,195 | #2,143 | 12 |
| 1945 | #232 | 815 | #2,242 | 10 |
| 1944 | #286 | 576 | — | |
| 1943 | #317 | 481 | — | |
| 1942 | #384 | 344 | — | |
| 1941 | #513 | 180 | — | |
| 1940 | #539 | 162 | — | |
| 1939 | #614 | 121 | — | |
| 1938 | #717 | 91 | — | |
| 1937 | #815 | 71 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,022 | 46 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,004 | 47 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,098 | 41 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,085 | 41 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,237 | 34 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,287 | 32 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,320 | 33 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,212 | 38 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,115 | 46 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,423 | 32 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,181 | 42 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,324 | 36 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,503 | 31 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,264 | 16 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,186 | 17 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,577 | 28 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,470 | 30 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,640 | 12 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,244 | 9 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,316 | 14 | — | |
| 1916 | #2,833 | 10 | — | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,981 | 9 | — | |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | — | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | #1,639 | 7 | — | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Vickie! It came in at #1,639, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1908–1910, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Vickie is popular in 1951
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#23 · 1 in 96
- Idaho#28 · 1 in 109
- North Carolina#38 · 1 in 168
- Montana#47 · 1 in 197
- Oklahoma#47 · 1 in 198
Best ever in a state: #20 in Utah, 1952.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #23 | 96 | 1 in 96 |
| Idaho | #28 | 57 | 1 in 109 |
| North Carolina | #38 | 300 | 1 in 168 |
| Montana | #47 | 31 | 1 in 197 |
| Oklahoma | #47 | 109 | 1 in 198 |
| Kansas | #50 | 100 | 1 in 195 |
| Indiana | #52 | 225 | 1 in 201 |
| Iowa | #52 | 129 | 1 in 228 |
| Kentucky | #55 | 149 | 1 in 228 |
| Nebraska | #57 | 57 | 1 in 251 |
| Tennessee | #57 | 157 | 1 in 242 |
| West Virginia | #63 | 87 | 1 in 264 |
| Georgia | #64 | 152 | 1 in 282 |
| Missouri | #67 | 151 | 1 in 272 |
| Oregon | #67 | 52 | 1 in 303 |
| South Dakota | #67 | 27 | 1 in 280 |
| Texas | #67 | 350 | 1 in 291 |
| Arkansas | #68 | 66 | 1 in 312 |
| Washington | #71 | 87 | 1 in 297 |
| Nevada | #72 | 6 | 1 in 207 |
| Ohio | #74 | 298 | 1 in 307 |
| Virginia | #74 | 117 | 1 in 320 |
| Colorado | #82 | 44 | 1 in 355 |
| Illinois | #88 | 216 | 1 in 425 |
| North Dakota | #90 | 18 | 1 in 386 |
| South Carolina | #91 | 76 | 1 in 374 |
| Michigan | #94 | 181 | 1 in 434 |
| California | #105 | 276 | 1 in 438 |
| Wisconsin | #105 | 68 | 1 in 578 |
| Wyoming | #105 | 7 | 1 in 396 |
| Louisiana | #106 | 70 | 1 in 506 |
| Arizona | #109 | 23 | 1 in 425 |
| Minnesota | #111 | 70 | 1 in 510 |
| Maryland | #123 | 42 | 1 in 588 |
| Alabama | #131 | 58 | 1 in 630 |
| Florida | #133 | 48 | 1 in 643 |
| New Mexico | #135 | 18 | 1 in 531 |
| Pennsylvania | #141 | 137 | 1 in 792 |
| District of Columbia | #167 | 14 | 1 in 907 |
| Mississippi | #173 | 36 | 1 in 795 |
| Maine | #174 | 8 | 1 in 1,102 |
| New York | #274 | 66 | 1 in 2,268 |
| New Jersey | #290 | 14 | 1 in 3,310 |
| Connecticut | #304 | 5 | 1 in 3,685 |
| Massachusetts | #305 | 10 | 1 in 4,635 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Vickie
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Biggest jump: 207 spots in 1937 (#1,022 → #815)
- Biggest drop: 114 spots in 1985 (#957 → #1,071)
- Debuted 1907
- Peaked 1956 at #68 (6,957 births)
- Births halved by 1964, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 10 yrs · run 1951–1960
- Top 1,000: 48 yrs · run 1937–1984
- Highest: 1 in 289 girls born in 1956 were named Vickie (0.35%)
- Latest: 1 in 162,019 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- 51.7% of all girls named Vickie (56,857) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | #1,639 (1907) | #1,639 |
| 1910s | 76 | #1,981 (1912) | #2,880 |
| 1920s | 316 | #1,115 (1928) | #1,526 |
| 1930s | 557 | #614 (1939) | #1,020 |
| 1940s | 10,041 | #124 (1949) | #291 |
| 1950s | 56,857 | #68 (1956) | #79 |
| 1960s | 31,766 | #100 (1960) | #133 |
| 1970s | 7,905 | #195 (1970) | #362 |
| 1980s | 1,622 | #631 (1980) | #1,042 |
| 1990s | 505 | #1,657 (1990) | #2,793 |
| 2000s | 230 | #3,738 (2000) | #5,805 |
| 2010s | 126 | #6,729 (2013) | #9,226 |
| 2020s | 38 | #9,546 (2020) | #9,988 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Vickie in 1951
Top girls' names in 1951
Top boys' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 417 of them was named Vickie, which outranked 98.6% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,882,837 boys got a published name in 1951; 1 in 134,488 of them was named Vickie, which outranked 51.7% of the 4,253 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,972Wilburt15
- #1,972Ysidro15
- #1,972Zebedee15
- #2,055Vickie14
- #2,055Anna14
- #2,055Anson14
- #2,055Armin14
- #2,135Adron13
- #2,135Alain13
- #2,135Alferd13
Tied with 79 names at #2,055; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.