Victoria
#54 for girls in 2025, 4,027 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #8,312
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 12,148 births
- Debut · girls
- 93 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 62 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 527,915since 1880
Victoria over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #54 | 4,027 | — | |
| 2024 | #48 | 4,281 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #45 | 4,454 | — | |
| 2022 | #43 | 4,782 | — | |
| 2021 | #43 | 4,713 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #34 | 5,303 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #25 | 6,380 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #21 | 7,134 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #19 | 7,314 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | #21 | 7,329 | — | |
| 2015 | #20 | 7,630 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #19 | 8,012 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #25 | 7,215 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #28 | 6,871 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #23 | 6,896 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #32 | 6,236 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #31 | 6,371 | #7,236 | 11 |
| 2008 | #27 | 7,127 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #29 | 7,435 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #27 | 7,653 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #28 | 7,961 | #4,824 | 17 |
| 2004 | #28 | 8,279 | #2,569 | 42 |
| 2003 | #22 | 9,251 | #5,271 | 14 |
| 2002 | #21 | 9,785 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #21 | 10,179 | #6,445 | 10 |
| 2000 | #20 | 10,926 | #4,204 | 18 |
| 1999 | #16 | 11,874 | #4,537 | 15 |
| 1998 | #16 | 12,148 | #4,019 | 17 |
| 1997 | #19 | 11,795 | #3,738 | 18 |
| 1996 | #18 | 11,859 | #3,406 | 20 |
| 1995 | #20 | 12,252 | #2,923 | 24 |
| 1994 | #19 | 12,694 | #3,030 | 23 |
| 1993 | #19 | 12,925 | #2,295 | 33 |
| 1992 | #22 | 11,907 | #2,834 | 24 |
| 1991 | #28 | 10,912 | #2,095 | 35 |
| 1990 | #33 | 9,109 | #2,012 | 37 |
| 1989 | #44 | 7,637 | #1,476 | 56 |
| 1988 | #42 | 7,283 | #2,146 | 29 |
| 1987 | #50 | 6,255 | #2,169 | 27 |
| 1986 | #54 | 5,676 | #1,662 | 38 |
| 1985 | #59 | 5,426 | #1,975 | 29 |
| 1984 | #59 | 5,076 | #2,706 | 17 |
| 1983 | #58 | 5,046 | #1,955 | 27 |
| 1982 | #65 | 4,255 | #2,426 | 20 |
| 1981 | #87 | 3,689 | #2,779 | 16 |
| 1980 | #103 | 2,929 | #3,098 | 14 |
| 1979 | #119 | 2,674 | — | |
| 1978 | #121 | 2,457 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #107 | 2,702 | #3,836 | 9 |
| 1976 | #92 | 3,036 | #3,724 | 9 |
| 1975 | #105 | 2,713 | #2,450 | 17 |
| 1974 | #104 | 2,844 | #3,120 | 11 |
| 1973 | #95 | 3,070 | #2,405 | 16 |
| 1972 | #99 | 3,206 | #2,323 | 16 |
| 1971 | #97 | 3,722 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #85 | 4,460 | #1,889 | 22 |
| 1969 | #83 | 4,390 | #2,308 | 14 |
| 1968 | #82 | 4,286 | #2,109 | 15 |
| 1967 | #93 | 3,664 | #2,242 | 13 |
| 1966 | #103 | 3,362 | #1,757 | 19 |
| 1965 | #108 | 3,480 | #1,987 | 16 |
| 1964 | #129 | 3,157 | #2,546 | 11 |
| 1963 | #130 | 3,246 | #2,115 | 15 |
| 1962 | #121 | 3,705 | #2,504 | 11 |
| 1961 | #114 | 4,149 | #2,706 | 10 |
| 1960 | #114 | 4,294 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #113 | 4,153 | #1,974 | 17 |
| 1958 | #109 | 4,466 | #3,275 | 7 |
| 1957 | #88 | 5,328 | #2,019 | 16 |
| 1956 | #85 | 5,388 | #2,628 | 10 |
| 1955 | #82 | 5,359 | #2,558 | 10 |
| 1954 | #85 | 4,978 | #3,452 | 6 |
| 1953 | #82 | 5,164 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #74 | 5,603 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #81 | 4,907 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #94 | 3,781 | #3,681 | 5 |
| 1949 | #96 | 3,669 | #3,019 | 7 |
| 1948 | #108 | 3,131 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #123 | 2,739 | #3,096 | 7 |
| 1946 | #122 | 2,388 | #2,690 | 8 |
| 1945 | #106 | 2,670 | #2,009 | 12 |
| 1944 | #139 | 1,815 | #3,109 | 6 |
| 1943 | #164 | 1,467 | — | |
| 1942 | #170 | 1,372 | #2,940 | 7 |
| 1941 | #216 | 814 | — | |
| 1940 | #243 | 687 | — | |
| 1939 | #241 | 675 | — | |
| 1938 | #260 | 588 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #252 | 629 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #269 | 507 | — | |
| 1935 | #256 | 603 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #259 | 585 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | #249 | 600 | #2,542 | 9 |
| 1932 | #258 | 592 | #2,849 | 8 |
| 1931 | #228 | 712 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | #228 | 713 | #3,592 | 6 |
| 1929 | #216 | 825 | #2,317 | 12 |
| 1928 | #217 | 833 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | #205 | 959 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #200 | 963 | — | |
| 1925 | #196 | 1,046 | — | |
| 1924 | #194 | 1,102 | — | |
| 1923 | #190 | 1,150 | #2,950 | 9 |
| 1922 | #186 | 1,145 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #179 | 1,238 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #173 | 1,286 | — | |
| 1919 | #154 | 1,429 | #3,736 | 6 |
| 1918 | #134 | 1,758 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #158 | 1,334 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #150 | 1,340 | #3,177 | 7 |
| 1915 | #151 | 1,266 | — | |
| 1914 | #145 | 1,026 | — | |
| 1913 | #147 | 825 | — | |
| 1912 | #150 | 711 | — | |
| 1911 | #160 | 503 | — | |
| 1910 | #142 | 574 | — | |
| 1909 | #160 | 426 | — | |
| 1908 | #156 | 435 | — | |
| 1907 | #159 | 400 | — | |
| 1906 | #159 | 362 | — | |
| 1905 | #163 | 343 | — | |
| 1904 | #167 | 320 | — | |
| 1903 | #156 | 330 | — | |
| 1902 | #151 | 339 | — | |
| 1901 | #142 | 346 | — | |
| 1900 | #148 | 391 | — | |
| 1899 | #156 | 289 | — | |
| 1898 | #171 | 276 | — | |
| 1897 | #180 | 234 | — | |
| 1896 | #158 | 281 | — | |
| 1895 | #160 | 269 | — | |
| 1894 | #163 | 251 | — | |
| 1893 | #168 | 223 | — | |
| 1892 | #165 | 229 | — | |
| 1891 | #164 | 204 | — | |
| 1890 | #158 | 223 | — | |
| 1889 | #167 | 175 | — | |
| 1888 | #152 | 207 | — | |
| 1887 | #155 | 157 | — | |
| 1886 | #150 | 162 | — | |
| 1885 | #141 | 163 | — | |
| 1884 | #158 | 124 | — | |
| 1883 | #159 | 110 | — | |
| 1882 | #136 | 132 | — | |
| 1881 | #134 | 117 | — | |
| 1880 | #148 | 93 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Victoria was already there! It came in at #148, and was given to 93 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 140 girls a year got the name.
Where Victoria is popular in 1929
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#71 · 1 in 258
- Hawaii#72 · 1 in 270
- California#115 · 1 in 510
- Connecticut#129 · 1 in 655
- Texas#138 · 1 in 628
Best ever in a state: #4 in Rhode Island, 1998.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #71 | 16 | 1 in 258 |
| Hawaii | #72 | 13 | 1 in 270 |
| California | #115 | 70 | 1 in 510 |
| Connecticut | #129 | 17 | 1 in 655 |
| Texas | #138 | 96 | 1 in 628 |
| Massachusetts | #150 | 28 | 1 in 1,126 |
| Colorado | #154 | 12 | 1 in 692 |
| New York | #155 | 109 | 1 in 886 |
| South Dakota | #156 | 7 | 1 in 767 |
| Pennsylvania | #157 | 77 | 1 in 1,077 |
| Rhode Island | #160 | 5 | 1 in 981 |
| Arizona | #165 | 7 | 1 in 610 |
| New Jersey | #165 | 27 | 1 in 1,081 |
| Louisiana | #176 | 28 | 1 in 765 |
| Michigan | #182 | 34 | 1 in 1,236 |
| South Carolina | #190 | 17 | 1 in 1,141 |
| Illinois | #194 | 43 | 1 in 1,327 |
| Wisconsin | #201 | 15 | 1 in 1,583 |
| Florida | #202 | 12 | 1 in 1,023 |
| Ohio | #204 | 32 | 1 in 1,606 |
| Kansas | #206 | 11 | 1 in 1,274 |
| Indiana | #226 | 13 | 1 in 1,898 |
| West Virginia | #236 | 12 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Nebraska | #268 | 5 | 1 in 2,122 |
| Mississippi | #275 | 12 | 1 in 1,790 |
| North Carolina | #275 | 17 | 1 in 2,110 |
| Minnesota | #300 | 6 | 1 in 3,201 |
| Georgia | #302 | 12 | 1 in 2,504 |
| Virginia | #305 | 8 | 1 in 2,968 |
| Kentucky | #306 | 11 | 1 in 2,405 |
| Missouri | #315 | 10 | 1 in 2,767 |
| Arkansas | #334 | 8 | 1 in 2,282 |
| Oklahoma | #420 | 6 | 1 in 3,800 |
| Alabama | #493 | 5 | 1 in 6,005 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Victoria
- 6 spots since 2024 (#48 → #54)
- 20 spots since 2020 (#34 → #54)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#20 → #54)
- Biggest jump: 46 spots in 1942 (#216 → #170)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 1932 (#228 → #258)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1998 at #16 (12,148 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 22 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 62 yrs · run 1981–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 140 girls born in 1993 were named Victoria (0.71%)
- Latest: 1 in 399 girls born in 2025 (0.25%)
- Its best rank, #16 in 1998, was only 1 in 145 (0.69%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.3% of all girls named Victoria (117,475) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,440 | #134 (1881) | #150 |
| 1890s | 2,479 | #156 (1899) | #164 |
| 1900s | 3,692 | #142 (1901) | #156 |
| 1910s | 10,766 | #134 (1918) | #149 |
| 1920s | 10,547 | #173 (1920) | #196 |
| 1930s | 6,204 | #228 (1930) | #250 |
| 1940s | 20,752 | #96 (1949) | #149 |
| 1950s | 49,127 | #74 (1952) | #89 |
| 1960s | 37,733 | #82 (1968) | #108 |
| 1970s | 30,884 | #85 (1970) | #102 |
| 1980s | 53,272 | #42 (1988) | #62 |
| 1990s | 117,475 | #16 (1998) | #21 |
| 2000s | 84,967 | #20 (2000) | #25 |
| 2010s | 71,017 | #19 (2014) | #23 |
| 2020s | 27,560 | #34 (2020) | #45 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Victoria in 1929
Top girls' names in 1929
Top boys' names in 1929
More about 1929
girls
1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 1,353 of them was named Victoria, which outranked 95.9% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 89,635 of them was named Victoria, which outranked 49.0% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,199Vilas13
- #2,199Wiliam13
- #2,199Woodford13
- #2,317Victoria12
- #2,317Agnes12
- #2,317Albion12
- #2,317Amon12
- #2,452Aden11
- #2,452Alexis11
- #2,452Alfons11
Tied with 134 names at #2,317; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.