Amelia
#4 for girls in 2025, 12,699 births · #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 12,786 births
- Debut · girls
- 221 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 27 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 281,130since 1880
Amelia over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4 | 12,699 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #3 | 12,786 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #4 | 12,365 | #9,763 | 7 |
| 2022 | #4 | 12,415 | #6,479 | 13 |
| 2021 | #4 | 13,041 | #8,825 | 8 |
| 2020 | #6 | 12,802 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #7 | 12,944 | #6,104 | 14 |
| 2018 | #8 | 12,405 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #8 | 11,870 | #6,685 | 12 |
| 2016 | #10 | 10,809 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #12 | 9,878 | — | |
| 2014 | #15 | 8,805 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #17 | 8,052 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #23 | 7,249 | — | |
| 2011 | #30 | 6,374 | #9,600 | 7 |
| 2010 | #41 | 5,464 | — | |
| 2009 | #55 | 4,705 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #68 | 4,352 | — | |
| 2007 | #77 | 4,194 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #83 | 4,065 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #84 | 3,912 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #96 | 3,354 | #5,492 | 14 |
| 2003 | #111 | 3,097 | — | |
| 2002 | #139 | 2,444 | — | |
| 2001 | #199 | 1,638 | — | |
| 2000 | #207 | 1,531 | — | |
| 1999 | #225 | 1,421 | — | |
| 1998 | #215 | 1,425 | — | |
| 1997 | #228 | 1,317 | — | |
| 1996 | #222 | 1,292 | — | |
| 1995 | #237 | 1,207 | — | |
| 1994 | #226 | 1,255 | — | |
| 1993 | #224 | 1,248 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #214 | 1,345 | — | |
| 1991 | #194 | 1,536 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #194 | 1,513 | — | |
| 1989 | #216 | 1,265 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #232 | 1,130 | — | |
| 1987 | #254 | 1,006 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #252 | 1,020 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #249 | 1,015 | — | |
| 1984 | #232 | 1,094 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #304 | 762 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #297 | 832 | — | |
| 1981 | #286 | 848 | — | |
| 1980 | #316 | 768 | — | |
| 1979 | #337 | 702 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #339 | 643 | — | |
| 1977 | #362 | 601 | — | |
| 1976 | #394 | 523 | — | |
| 1975 | #387 | 523 | — | |
| 1974 | #399 | 507 | — | |
| 1973 | #436 | 442 | — | |
| 1972 | #458 | 406 | — | |
| 1971 | #432 | 481 | — | |
| 1970 | #445 | 493 | — | |
| 1969 | #445 | 465 | — | |
| 1968 | #489 | 390 | — | |
| 1967 | #445 | 450 | — | |
| 1966 | #452 | 431 | — | |
| 1965 | #431 | 475 | — | |
| 1964 | #438 | 503 | — | |
| 1963 | #433 | 503 | — | |
| 1962 | #436 | 494 | — | |
| 1961 | #407 | 571 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | #414 | 542 | — | |
| 1959 | #424 | 502 | — | |
| 1958 | #427 | 484 | — | |
| 1957 | #404 | 520 | — | |
| 1956 | #392 | 526 | — | |
| 1955 | #383 | 530 | — | |
| 1954 | #380 | 511 | — | |
| 1953 | #360 | 552 | — | |
| 1952 | #350 | 549 | — | |
| 1951 | #345 | 532 | — | |
| 1950 | #357 | 483 | — | |
| 1949 | #320 | 589 | — | |
| 1948 | #330 | 564 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #343 | 539 | — | |
| 1946 | #317 | 547 | — | |
| 1945 | #312 | 474 | — | |
| 1944 | #307 | 476 | — | |
| 1943 | #292 | 559 | — | |
| 1942 | #290 | 543 | — | |
| 1941 | #279 | 529 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #279 | 504 | — | |
| 1939 | #282 | 489 | — | |
| 1938 | #265 | 570 | — | |
| 1937 | #245 | 647 | — | |
| 1936 | #254 | 580 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #255 | 604 | #2,951 | 7 |
| 1934 | #264 | 553 | — | |
| 1933 | #246 | 608 | — | |
| 1932 | #243 | 637 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #248 | 591 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | #236 | 679 | #2,293 | 12 |
| 1929 | #229 | 687 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #227 | 755 | — | |
| 1927 | #235 | 754 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #236 | 746 | #3,385 | 7 |
| 1925 | #216 | 889 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #216 | 910 | — | |
| 1923 | #205 | 965 | — | |
| 1922 | #195 | 1,032 | — | |
| 1921 | #200 | 995 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #190 | 1,054 | — | |
| 1919 | #181 | 1,085 | — | |
| 1918 | #183 | 1,115 | — | |
| 1917 | #173 | 1,160 | — | |
| 1916 | #167 | 1,159 | — | |
| 1915 | #165 | 1,115 | — | |
| 1914 | #156 | 926 | — | |
| 1913 | #161 | 721 | — | |
| 1912 | #160 | 672 | — | |
| 1911 | #174 | 430 | — | |
| 1910 | #163 | 449 | — | |
| 1909 | #163 | 388 | — | |
| 1908 | #163 | 370 | — | |
| 1907 | #163 | 380 | — | |
| 1906 | #160 | 358 | — | |
| 1905 | #155 | 365 | — | |
| 1904 | #153 | 353 | — | |
| 1903 | #150 | 347 | — | |
| 1902 | #149 | 355 | — | |
| 1901 | #140 | 350 | — | |
| 1900 | #146 | 398 | — | |
| 1899 | #140 | 332 | — | |
| 1898 | #140 | 360 | — | |
| 1897 | #121 | 408 | — | |
| 1896 | #131 | 365 | — | |
| 1895 | #125 | 379 | — | |
| 1894 | #119 | 390 | — | |
| 1893 | #114 | 385 | — | |
| 1892 | #118 | 385 | — | |
| 1891 | #112 | 353 | — | |
| 1890 | #109 | 368 | — | |
| 1889 | #110 | 346 | — | |
| 1888 | #108 | 358 | — | |
| 1887 | #93 | 344 | — | |
| 1886 | #101 | 326 | — | |
| 1885 | #102 | 298 | — | |
| 1884 | #96 | 315 | — | |
| 1883 | #97 | 262 | — | |
| 1882 | #102 | 252 | — | |
| 1881 | #93 | 235 | — | |
| 1880 | #96 | 221 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Amelia was already there! It came in at #96, and was given to 221 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1886, when fewer than 330 girls a year got the name.
Where Amelia is popular in 1929
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#49 · 1 in 203
- New Mexico#55 · 1 in 217
- Connecticut#131 · 1 in 696
- Rhode Island#135 · 1 in 701
- New Jersey#138 · 1 in 810
Best ever in a state: #1 in Rhode Island, 2018.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #49 | 21 | 1 in 203 |
| New Mexico | #55 | 19 | 1 in 217 |
| Connecticut | #131 | 16 | 1 in 696 |
| Rhode Island | #135 | 7 | 1 in 701 |
| New Jersey | #138 | 36 | 1 in 810 |
| California | #144 | 54 | 1 in 662 |
| Pennsylvania | #153 | 81 | 1 in 1,024 |
| Texas | #159 | 85 | 1 in 710 |
| New York | #172 | 89 | 1 in 1,085 |
| Maryland | #186 | 10 | 1 in 1,257 |
| Ohio | #204 | 32 | 1 in 1,606 |
| Massachusetts | #205 | 16 | 1 in 1,970 |
| South Carolina | #213 | 14 | 1 in 1,385 |
| Illinois | #237 | 29 | 1 in 1,968 |
| Michigan | #237 | 21 | 1 in 2,002 |
| Virginia | #246 | 13 | 1 in 1,826 |
| Mississippi | #275 | 12 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Louisiana | #310 | 10 | 1 in 2,143 |
| Florida | #329 | 5 | 1 in 2,455 |
| Missouri | #330 | 9 | 1 in 3,074 |
| Minnesota | #337 | 5 | 1 in 3,841 |
| West Virginia | #337 | 6 | 1 in 3,028 |
| Indiana | #349 | 6 | 1 in 4,112 |
| Tennessee | #370 | 7 | 1 in 3,675 |
| Wisconsin | #371 | 5 | 1 in 4,748 |
| Georgia | #408 | 7 | 1 in 4,293 |
| North Carolina | #456 | 6 | 1 in 5,979 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amelia
- 1 spot since 2024 (#3 → #4)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#6 → #4)
- 8 spots since 2015 (#12 → #4)
- Biggest jump: 72 spots in 1984 (#304 → #232)
- Biggest drop: 44 spots in 1968 (#445 → #489)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2024 at #3 (12,786 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
- Top 100: 27 yrs · run 2004–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2021 were named Amelia (0.79%)
- Latest: 1 in 127 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
- Its best rank, #3 in 2024, was only 1 in 127 (0.79%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 33.4% of all girls named Amelia (93,850) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #93 (1887) → #489 (1968) → #3 (2024)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,957 | #93 (1887) | #100 |
| 1890s | 3,725 | #109 (1890) | #123 |
| 1900s | 3,664 | #140 (1901) | #154 |
| 1910s | 8,832 | #156 (1914) | #168 |
| 1920s | 8,787 | #190 (1920) | #215 |
| 1930s | 5,958 | #236 (1930) | #254 |
| 1940s | 5,324 | #279 (1941) | #307 |
| 1950s | 5,189 | #345 (1951) | #382 |
| 1960s | 4,824 | #407 (1961) | #439 |
| 1970s | 5,321 | #337 (1979) | #399 |
| 1980s | 9,740 | #216 (1989) | #264 |
| 1990s | 13,559 | #194 (1991) | #218 |
| 2000s | 33,292 | #55 (2009) | #112 |
| 2010s | 93,850 | #7 (2019) | #17 |
| 2020s | 76,108 | #3 (2024) | #4 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amelia in 1929
Top girls' names in 1929
Top boys' names in 1929
More about 1929
girls
1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 1,625 of them was named Amelia, which outranked 95.7% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 215,123 of them was named Amelia, which outranked 12.9% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 586 names at #3,959; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.