Fern

#1,219 for girls in 2025, 186 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #5,659
Given to girls 98.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1916 · 1,332 births
Debut · girls
10 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
37,666
since 1880

Fern over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Fern has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201929peak #152, 1916girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,219186—
2024#1,250186#5,65916
2023#1,421157—
2022#1,478148#12,3305
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,864108—
2018#1,656127—
2017#2,20086—
2016#2,20687—
2015#2,19486—
2014#2,68365—
2013#3,40446—
2012#3,52345—
2011#4,24434—
2010#4,39733—
2009#5,37826—
2008#5,27927—
2007#10,81810—
2006#7,48216—
2005#6,52818—
2004#6,21619—
2003#7,99813—
2002#8,83711—
2001#10,1029—
2000#5,93718—
1999#7,23913—
1998#8,58410—
1997#7,74211—
1996#11,8076—
1995#6,64113—
1994#6,67213—
1993#9,5598—
1992#13,3175—
1991#8,5889—
1990#8,5019—
1989#5,54515—
1988#4,49619—
1987#7,9878—
1986#10,9125—
1985#5,34813—
1984#3,72621—
1983#4,28617—
1982#2,90131—
1981#3,06628—
1980#4,32717—
1979#2,99728—
1978#4,24216—
1977#3,61220—
1976#3,96316—
1975#3,15522—
1974#2,83525—
1973#2,30933—
1972#2,35631—
1971#2,03541—
1970#1,49067#4,7245
1969#1,72849—
1968#1,51956—
1967#1,29970—
1966#1,28471—
1965#1,16884—
1964#1,060105—
1963#1,022109#4,0485
1962#1,12194—
1961#821164—
1960#755183—
1959#702204—
1958#748177—
1957#731187—
1956#629232—
1955#633216—
1954#585237—
1953#543256#2,9058
1952#577226#3,7345
1951#527250—
1950#547228#2,7708
1949#538238#3,6905
1948#528245—
1947#520255—
1946#464284—
1945#442260#2,5748
1944#427281—
1943#423300—
1942#407311#2,9407
1941#396301#3,5055
1940#359328#3,4595
1939#359327—
1938#323377#3,1756
1937#326366#2,33210
1936#303395#2,6298
1935#289429#2,9517
1934#285462#2,7428
1933#275507#1,82915
1932#277503#3,3616
1931#255571#2,20712
1930#246633#3,0228
1929#231679#2,19913
1928#221806#2,27013
1927#219845#1,87118
1926#209912#3,1398
1925#203976#2,08915
1924#1971,059#2,04316
1923#1871,169#1,87418
1922#1821,207#1,95217
1921#1741,297#1,70321
1920#1701,304#1,69421
1919#1761,181#1,97316
1918#1641,341#2,07315
1917#1621,261#1,90016
1916#1521,332#1,77117
1915#1571,175#1,30626
1914#172821#1,68714
1913#166697#1,67611
1912#167613#2,0457
1911#172435#1,3877
1910#174394#1,3147
1909#173345#1,0838
1908#166364—
1907#193276—
1906#181277#1,2535
1905#183273#1,2335
1904#173281—
1903#176276#69611
1902#190238#1,0136
1901#191217—
1900#193266—
1899#182232—
1898#174265—
1897#178237#7878
1896#186218—
1895#199184—
1894#188197#8577
1893#185189#1,0355
1892#192172—
1891#214124—
1890#224119—
1889#230103#9745
1888#26277—
1887#25269—
1886#35636#8456
1885#30344—
1884#30440#9715
1883#43519—
1882#34826—
1881#53910—
1880#54710—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Fern was already there! It came in at #547, and was given to 10 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1986, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Fern is popular in 1929

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedAKMaine: #183 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,053 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNHWashington: #177 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,014 girlsWAIdaho: #140 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 549 girlsIDMontana: #99 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 379 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #93 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 322 girlsNDMinnesota: #113 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 519 girlsMNIllinois: #150 for girls · 63 births · 1 in 906 girlsILWisconsin: #133 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 848 girlsWIMichigan: #184 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 1,274 girlsMINew York: #363 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 4,600 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #69 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 283 girlsSDIowa: #115 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 545 girlsIAIndiana: #146 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 881 girlsINOhio: #209 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 1,657 girlsOHPennsylvania: #172 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 1,338 girlsPANew Jersey: #265 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,917 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #237 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,554 girlsCAUtah: #83 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 324 girlsUTColorado: #178 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 830 girlsCONebraska: #105 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 424 girlsNEMissouri: #132 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 565 girlsMOKentucky: #272 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,890 girlsKYWest Virginia: #294 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,271 girlsWVVirginia: #393 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,748 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNMKansas: #134 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 584 girlsKSArkansas: #219 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,074 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #199 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 991 girlsOKLouisiana: #475 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,286 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedHITexas: #538 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 4,309 girlsTXFlorida: #299 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,046 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Dakota#69 · 1 in 283
  2. Utah#83 · 1 in 324
  3. North Dakota#93 · 1 in 322
  4. Montana#99 · 1 in 379
  5. Nebraska#105 · 1 in 424

Best ever in a state: #19 in Utah, 1912.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Dakota#69191 in 283
Utah#83141 in 324
North Dakota#93191 in 322
Montana#99101 in 379
Nebraska#105251 in 424
Minnesota#113371 in 519
Iowa#115341 in 545
Missouri#132491 in 565
Wisconsin#133281 in 848
Kansas#134241 in 584
Idaho#14061 in 549
Indiana#146281 in 881
Illinois#150631 in 906
Pennsylvania#172621 in 1,338
Washington#17791 in 1,014
Colorado#178101 in 830
Maine#18361 in 1,053
Michigan#184331 in 1,274
Oklahoma#199231 in 991
Ohio#209311 in 1,657
Arkansas#219171 in 1,074
California#237231 in 1,554
New Jersey#265101 in 2,917
Kentucky#272141 in 1,890
West Virginia#29481 in 2,271
Florida#29961 in 2,046
New York#363211 in 4,600
Virginia#39351 in 4,748
Louisiana#47551 in 4,286
Texas#538141 in 4,309
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Tennessee———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Fern
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 31 spots since 2024 (#1,250 → #1,219)
  • 340 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,219)
  • 975 spots since 2015 (#2,194 → #1,219)
  • Biggest jump: 191 spots in 1882 (#539 → #348)
  • Biggest drop: 300 spots in 1962 (#821 → #1,121)
Rise & fade · girls
36 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1916 at #152 (1,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1930, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 82 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1880–1961
Share of babies · girls
1 in 784
  • Highest: 1 in 784 girls born in 1916 were named Fern (0.13%)
  • Latest: 1 in 8,641 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 27.2% of all girls named Fern (10,254) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s434#230 (1889)#358
1890s1,937#174 (1898)#192
1900s2,813#166 (1908)#182
1910s9,250#152 (1916)#166
1920s10,254#170 (1920)#199
1930s4,570#246 (1930)#294
1940s2,803#359 (1940)#450
1950s2,213#527 (1951)#622
1960s985#755 (1960)#1,178
1970s299#1,490 (1970)#2,899
1980s174#2,901 (1982)#5,259
1990s97#6,641 (1995)#8,865
2000s167#5,279 (2008)#7,458
2010s717#1,656 (2018)#2,837
2020s953#1,219 (2025)#1,404

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Fern in 1929

girls
#231
679 births · 1 in 1,644 girls
boys
#2,199
13 births · 1 in 82,740 boys

Top girls' names in 1929

  1. #1Mary63,512
  2. #2Betty36,675
  3. #3Dorothy31,476
  4. #4Helen20,983
  5. #5Margaret19,212
  6. #6Doris16,498
  7. #7Barbara16,038
  8. #8Ruth16,021
  9. #9Shirley14,576
  10. #10Patricia13,624
  11. #231Fern679

Top boys' names in 1929

  1. #1Robert59,807
  2. #2James52,135
  3. #3John52,112
  4. #4William47,815
  5. #5Charles29,930
  6. #6Richard29,572
  7. #7Donald27,181
  8. #8George23,020
  9. #9Joseph21,165
  10. #10Edward17,220
  11. #2,199Fern13
More about 1929

girls

1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 1,644 of them was named Fern, which outranked 95.6% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #228Jewel690
  2. #229Amelia687
  3. #230Ollie681
  4. #231Fern679
  5. #232Ina677
  6. #233Angela676
  7. #234Lottie674
Biggest movers since 1928
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,951Dorla#2,623 → #672
  2. ↑ 797Ingrid#1,738 → #941
  3. ↑ 534Sydell#1,502 → #968
  4. ↑ 521Elenor#1,502 → #981
  5. ↑ 406Jeanine#888 → #482
Fallers
  1. ↓ 937Joline#888 → #1,825
  2. ↓ 259Mafalda#936 → #1,195
  3. ↓ 250Lorelei#994 → #1,244
  4. ↓ 249Ardelle#888 → #1,137
  5. ↓ 234Charmaine#420 → #654

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 82,740 of them was named Fern, which outranked 51.6% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #2,096Whitfield14
  2. #2,096Worley14
  3. #2,096Young14
  4. #2,199Fern13
  5. #2,199Ace13
  6. #2,199Adrain13
  7. #2,199Almer13
  8. #2,317Agnes12
  9. #2,317Albion12
  10. #2,317Amon12

Tied with 117 names at #2,199; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1928
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,188Davey#2,843 → #655
  2. ↑ 554Davie#1,413 → #859
  3. ↑ 374Derald#1,095 → #721
  4. ↑ 358Vernal#1,353 → #995
  5. ↑ 350Ken#1,228 → #878
Fallers
  1. ↓ 530Adolf#950 → #1,480
  2. ↓ 426Quinton#913 → #1,339
  3. ↓ 349Thornton#963 → #1,312
  4. ↓ 346Verlyn#891 → #1,237
  5. ↓ 346Isidore#891 → #1,237

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1929 →