Bexley
#960 for girls in 2025, 268 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 92.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2021 · 378 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,239since 2009
Bexley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #960 | 268 | #6,143 | 14 |
| 2024 | #1,128 | 214 | #5,443 | 17 |
| 2023 | #1,055 | 237 | #5,075 | 19 |
| 2022 | #888 | 314 | #5,019 | 19 |
| 2021 | #752 | 378 | #3,582 | 31 |
| 2020 | #840 | 325 | #3,734 | 28 |
| 2019 | #951 | 278 | #4,639 | 21 |
| 2018 | #908 | 296 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #925 | 286 | #2,891 | 41 |
| 2016 | #973 | 276 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #1,215 | 204 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #2,714 | 64 | #7,048 | 11 |
| 2013 | #2,973 | 56 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #6,576 | 19 | #8,864 | 8 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | — | |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Bexley! It came in at #15,242, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2009–2010, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Bexley is popular in 2015
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#381 · 1 in 1,530
- Ohio#399 · 1 in 1,885
- Iowa#411 · 1 in 1,613
- Kansas#519 · 1 in 2,171
- Utah#553 · 1 in 2,544
Best ever in a state: #113 in South Dakota, 2016.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #381 | 11 | 1 in 1,530 |
| Ohio | #399 | 28 | 1 in 1,885 |
| Iowa | #411 | 8 | 1 in 1,613 |
| Kansas | #519 | 6 | 1 in 2,171 |
| Utah | #553 | 7 | 1 in 2,544 |
| Minnesota | #610 | 8 | 1 in 3,058 |
| Indiana | #618 | 10 | 1 in 3,063 |
| North Carolina | #760 | 11 | 1 in 4,128 |
| Washington | #931 | 6 | 1 in 5,224 |
| Arizona | #1,093 | 5 | 1 in 6,180 |
| Michigan | #1,107 | 6 | 1 in 7,031 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,399 | 5 | 1 in 10,559 |
| Illinois | #1,449 | 6 | 1 in 9,755 |
| Georgia | #1,495 | 5 | 1 in 9,739 |
| Texas | #1,620 | 14 | 1 in 12,120 |
| Florida | #1,642 | 7 | 1 in 12,281 |
| California | #2,152 | 10 | 1 in 20,534 |
| New York | #2,215 | 5 | 1 in 18,264 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Bexley
- 168 spots since 2024 (#1,128 → #960)
- 120 spots since 2020 (#840 → #960)
- 255 spots since 2015 (#1,215 → #960)
- Biggest jump: 242 spots in 2016 (#1,215 → #973)
- Biggest drop: 167 spots in 2023 (#888 → #1,055)
- Debuted 2009
- Peaked 2021 at #752 (378 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 8 yrs · run 2016–2022
- Highest: 1 in 4,341 girls born in 2021 were named Bexley (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,997 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 53.6% of all girls named Bexley (1,736) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6 | #15,242 (2009) | #15,242 |
| 2010s | 1,497 | #908 (2018) | #3,989 |
| 2020s | 1,736 | #752 (2021) | #937 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Bexley in 2015
Top girls' names in 2015
Top boys' names in 2015
More about 2015
girls
1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 8,750 of them was named Bexley, which outranked 93.6% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,916,743 boys got a published name in 2015; 1 in 239,593 of them was named Bexley, which outranked 37.8% of the 14,059 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #8,040Zymire9
- #8,040Zyquan9
- #8,040Zyren9
- #8,744Bexley8
- #8,744Aadon8
- #8,744Aashrith8
- #8,744Aban8
- #9,568Aadhyan7
- #9,568Aadrian7
- #9,568Aamari7
Tied with 823 names at #8,744; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.