Conner
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · #864 for boys in 2025, 277 births
Given to boys 98.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2005 · 3,207 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 56,395since 1915
Conner over time
Rank among boys' names. Conner has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | #864 | 277 |
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | #780 | 322 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #735 | 357 |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 | #633 | 440 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #512 | 572 |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | #438 | 676 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #373 | 848 |
| 2018 | #10,545 | 9 | #365 | 910 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #334 | 1,023 |
| 2016 | #8,875 | 12 | #311 | 1,147 |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | #256 | 1,415 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #228 | 1,639 |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | #218 | 1,703 |
| 2012 | #9,711 | 11 | #202 | 1,908 |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 | #175 | 2,173 |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #158 | 2,440 |
| 2009 | — | #156 | 2,498 | |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #162 | 2,422 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #159 | 2,631 |
| 2006 | #7,868 | 15 | #144 | 2,851 |
| 2005 | #5,600 | 22 | #127 | 3,207 |
| 2004 | #3,127 | 49 | #134 | 3,005 |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | #153 | 2,677 |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 | #197 | 1,927 |
| 2001 | #5,009 | 23 | #199 | 1,833 |
| 2000 | #4,185 | 29 | #191 | 1,880 |
| 1999 | #2,737 | 50 | #185 | 1,882 |
| 1998 | #2,398 | 58 | #192 | 1,776 |
| 1997 | #2,070 | 68 | #190 | 1,727 |
| 1996 | #1,930 | 74 | #199 | 1,560 |
| 1995 | #2,052 | 66 | #204 | 1,460 |
| 1994 | #1,905 | 74 | #225 | 1,292 |
| 1993 | #2,045 | 67 | #228 | 1,292 |
| 1992 | #2,459 | 52 | #296 | 912 |
| 1991 | #4,059 | 25 | #456 | 468 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | #625 | 263 |
| 1989 | — | #715 | 190 | |
| 1988 | — | #710 | 175 | |
| 1987 | — | #798 | 135 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,617 | 40 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,504 | 44 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,723 | 33 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,955 | 27 | |
| 1982 | — | #3,692 | 11 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,138 | 24 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,430 | 12 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,168 | 13 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,799 | 15 | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | #4,375 | 6 | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | #3,595 | 7 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,673 | 6 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | #3,537 | 6 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #3,646 | 6 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #4,038 | 5 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | #3,257 | 7 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | #2,942 | 8 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #3,668 | 5 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,862 | 7 | |
| 1943 | — | #3,231 | 6 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,212 | 6 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,656 | 8 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | #2,680 | 8 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | #3,645 | 5 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,277 | 6 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,004 | 7 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,361 | 6 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,651 | 9 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,980 | 8 | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | #3,139 | 8 | |
| 1925 | — | #4,197 | 5 | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | #2,950 | 9 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,872 | 6 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,869 | 6 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,815 | 6 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,511 | 11 | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #2,423 | 11 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,926 | 8 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,621 | 9 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Conner! It came in at #2,621, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1918, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Conner is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Idaho#82 · 1 in 292
- Utah#86 · 1 in 322
- Nebraska#94 · 1 in 351
- Iowa#96 · 1 in 347
- Oklahoma#98 · 1 in 396
Best ever in a state: #42 in Idaho, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #82 | 27 | 1 in 292 |
| Utah | #86 | 65 | 1 in 322 |
| Nebraska | #94 | 29 | 1 in 351 |
| Iowa | #96 | 48 | 1 in 347 |
| Oklahoma | #98 | 52 | 1 in 396 |
| Washington | #98 | 87 | 1 in 399 |
| Wyoming | #102 | 6 | 1 in 291 |
| Indiana | #107 | 86 | 1 in 457 |
| North Dakota | #108 | 10 | 1 in 343 |
| Maine | #120 | 12 | 1 in 459 |
| Arkansas | #122 | 29 | 1 in 513 |
| Kentucky | #125 | 36 | 1 in 672 |
| Delaware | #131 | 7 | 1 in 603 |
| Missouri | #131 | 56 | 1 in 614 |
| Mississippi | #134 | 26 | 1 in 598 |
| South Dakota | #136 | 8 | 1 in 487 |
| Colorado | #144 | 51 | 1 in 557 |
| Nevada | #145 | 21 | 1 in 590 |
| Michigan | #147 | 83 | 1 in 714 |
| Minnesota | #148 | 40 | 1 in 734 |
| Ohio | #148 | 95 | 1 in 743 |
| Kansas | #149 | 29 | 1 in 569 |
| Louisiana | #150 | 40 | 1 in 681 |
| Pennsylvania | #153 | 77 | 1 in 854 |
| Wisconsin | #156 | 43 | 1 in 687 |
| Tennessee | #159 | 42 | 1 in 870 |
| West Virginia | #159 | 11 | 1 in 836 |
| Alaska | #171 | 5 | 1 in 664 |
| Oregon | #171 | 28 | 1 in 706 |
| Virginia | #173 | 42 | 1 in 977 |
| Montana | #179 | 6 | 1 in 666 |
| Rhode Island | #179 | 5 | 1 in 1,054 |
| Georgia | #184 | 58 | 1 in 955 |
| South Carolina | #196 | 19 | 1 in 1,100 |
| Alabama | #213 | 21 | 1 in 1,205 |
| New Mexico | #218 | 11 | 1 in 968 |
| Illinois | #233 | 61 | 1 in 1,319 |
| North Carolina | #237 | 39 | 1 in 1,326 |
| Florida | #245 | 64 | 1 in 1,395 |
| Massachusetts | #248 | 19 | 1 in 1,907 |
| Arizona | #249 | 30 | 1 in 1,264 |
| Hawaii | #250 | 5 | 1 in 1,038 |
| Maryland | #258 | 18 | 1 in 1,597 |
| California | #269 | 147 | 1 in 1,686 |
| Connecticut | #270 | 9 | 1 in 2,020 |
| Texas | #287 | 111 | 1 in 1,544 |
| New Jersey | #314 | 20 | 1 in 2,396 |
| New York | #401 | 39 | 1 in 2,938 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Conner
- 84 spots since 2024 (#780 → #864)
- 426 spots since 2020 (#438 → #864)
- 608 spots since 2015 (#256 → #864)
- Biggest jump: 819 spots in 1987 (#1,617 → #798)
- Biggest drop: 121 spots in 2022 (#512 → #633)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 2005 at #127 (3,207 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 39 yrs · run 1987–2025
- Highest: 1 in 623 boys born in 2005 were named Conner (0.16%)
- Latest: 1 in 6,166 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 44.2% of all boys named Conner (24,931) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 39 | #2,423 (1917) | #2,620 |
| 1920s | 48 | #2,950 (1923) | #3,546 |
| 1930s | 50 | #2,651 (1931) | #3,057 |
| 1940s | 44 | #2,656 (1941) | #3,158 |
| 1950s | 35 | #2,531 (1953) | #3,286 |
| 1960s | 36 | #3,537 (1965) | #3,675 |
| 1970s | 39 | #2,799 (1978) | #3,982 |
| 1980s | 691 | #710 (1988) | #1,828 |
| 1990s | 12,632 | #185 (1999) | #280 |
| 2000s | 24,931 | #127 (2005) | #162 |
| 2010s | 15,206 | #158 (2010) | #262 |
| 2020s | 2,644 | #438 (2020) | #660 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Conner in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 62,622 of them was named Conner, which outranked 76.3% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,079Yocelin30
- #4,079Zarina30
- #4,079Zoria30
- #4,185Conner29
- #4,185Abbagail29
- #4,185Aime29
- #4,185Ajla29
- #4,291Acadia28
- #4,291Adelia28
- #4,291Adi28
Tied with 105 names at #4,185; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 1,045 of them was named Conner, which outranked 98.4% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.