Jacey
#2,458 for girls in 2025, 72 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #8,987
Given to girls 94.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2000 · 322 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,044since 1965
Jacey over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,458 | 72 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,218 | 85 | #8,987 | 8 |
| 2023 | #2,397 | 75 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #2,295 | 81 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #2,212 | 84 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #2,065 | 89 | #9,554 | 7 |
| 2019 | #1,971 | 98 | #6,777 | 12 |
| 2018 | #1,748 | 117 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,482 | 150 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | #1,384 | 169 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #1,372 | 172 | #5,507 | 16 |
| 2014 | #1,284 | 186 | #6,632 | 12 |
| 2013 | #1,105 | 220 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #1,055 | 238 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #882 | 297 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2010 | #1,008 | 249 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #842 | 331 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #805 | 358 | #5,487 | 16 |
| 2007 | #856 | 330 | #4,996 | 18 |
| 2006 | #747 | 370 | #4,675 | 19 |
| 2005 | #787 | 331 | #3,710 | 25 |
| 2004 | #802 | 315 | #4,421 | 19 |
| 2003 | #846 | 288 | #4,426 | 18 |
| 2002 | #802 | 292 | #5,395 | 13 |
| 2001 | #813 | 289 | #6,935 | 9 |
| 2000 | #718 | 322 | #5,920 | 11 |
| 1999 | #778 | 283 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #871 | 242 | #4,873 | 13 |
| 1997 | #894 | 225 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #964 | 199 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #1,261 | 134 | #3,559 | 18 |
| 1994 | #1,141 | 156 | #4,094 | 15 |
| 1993 | #1,185 | 146 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #1,149 | 153 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #1,619 | 93 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #1,701 | 86 | #4,673 | 11 |
| 1989 | #1,701 | 80 | #4,527 | 11 |
| 1988 | #2,251 | 50 | #4,786 | 9 |
| 1987 | #2,044 | 54 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #1,932 | 57 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #2,172 | 48 | #5,147 | 7 |
| 1984 | #2,149 | 46 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,310 | 41 | #4,499 | 8 |
| 1982 | #3,017 | 29 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #2,614 | 35 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,308 | 42 | #4,134 | 9 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 | #4,842 | 7 |
| 1978 | #2,125 | 44 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #2,838 | 28 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,287 | 21 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,680 | 28 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #3,426 | 19 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #3,787 | 16 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jacey! It came in at #6,539, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1965–1968, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jacey is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Louisiana#286 · 1 in 1,370
- Oklahoma#304 · 1 in 1,398
- Kentucky#327 · 1 in 1,860
- Iowa#337 · 1 in 1,772
- Arkansas#347 · 1 in 1,738
Best ever in a state: #108 in South Dakota, 1998.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #286 | 16 | 1 in 1,370 |
| Oklahoma | #304 | 12 | 1 in 1,398 |
| Kentucky | #327 | 11 | 1 in 1,860 |
| Iowa | #337 | 8 | 1 in 1,772 |
| Arkansas | #347 | 7 | 1 in 1,738 |
| Kansas | #397 | 7 | 1 in 1,906 |
| Missouri | #416 | 12 | 1 in 2,452 |
| Ohio | #427 | 22 | 1 in 2,818 |
| Tennessee | #439 | 12 | 1 in 2,596 |
| Alabama | #483 | 8 | 1 in 2,640 |
| Utah | #548 | 6 | 1 in 2,841 |
| Wisconsin | #563 | 7 | 1 in 3,642 |
| Colorado | #574 | 8 | 1 in 3,010 |
| Minnesota | #617 | 6 | 1 in 4,272 |
| Indiana | #639 | 8 | 1 in 4,163 |
| Texas | #647 | 38 | 1 in 4,031 |
| North Carolina | #663 | 10 | 1 in 4,509 |
| Pennsylvania | #724 | 10 | 1 in 5,806 |
| Illinois | #836 | 12 | 1 in 5,937 |
| Georgia | #886 | 8 | 1 in 6,007 |
| Florida | #946 | 11 | 1 in 7,028 |
| Virginia | #960 | 5 | 1 in 7,106 |
| California | #1,378 | 18 | 1 in 12,435 |
| New York | #1,810 | 6 | 1 in 16,738 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jacey
- 240 spots since 2024 (#2,218 → #2,458)
- 393 spots since 2020 (#2,065 → #2,458)
- 1,086 spots since 2015 (#1,372 → #2,458)
- Biggest jump: 297 spots in 1996 (#1,261 → #964)
- Biggest drop: 173 spots in 2012 (#882 → #1,055)
- Debuted 1965
- Peaked 2000 at #718 (322 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 17 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 15 yrs · run 1996–2009
- Highest: 1 in 5,138 girls born in 2006 were named Jacey (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,323 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #718 in 2000, was only 1 in 5,640 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 40.1% of all girls named Jacey (3,226) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15 | #4,723 (1969) | #5,631 |
| 1970s | 222 | #2,125 (1978) | #3,700 |
| 1980s | 482 | #1,701 (1989) | #2,250 |
| 1990s | 1,717 | #778 (1999) | #1,156 |
| 2000s | 3,226 | #718 (2000) | #802 |
| 2010s | 1,896 | #882 (2011) | #1,329 |
| 2020s | 486 | #2,065 (2020) | #2,274 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jacey in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 5,640 of them was named Jacey, which outranked 95.9% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #714Candice324
- #716Abigayle323
- #716Susana323
- #718Jacey322
- #718Aliya322
- #718Carol322
- #718Casandra322
- #723Alena321
- #723Aylin321
- #723Shea321
Tied with 4 names at #718; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 178,546 of them was named Jacey, which outranked 51.2% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #5,588Zubair12
- #5,588Zuri12
- #5,588Zyron12
- #5,920Jacey11
- #5,920Aaditya11
- #5,920Abdou11
- #5,920Abdurahman11
- #6,316Aaric10
- #6,316Aashish10
- #6,316Aasim10
Tied with 395 names at #5,920; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.