Jalil
Last seen for girls in 2001 at #15,352 · #3,757 for boys in 2025, 29 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2000 · 113 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,910since 1974
Jalil over time
Rank among boys' names. Jalil has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,757 | 29 | |
| 2024 | — | #4,321 | 24 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,347 | 35 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,151 | 38 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,732 | 46 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,167 | 64 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,491 | 53 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,472 | 52 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,493 | 51 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,047 | 69 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,600 | 47 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,317 | 56 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,964 | 70 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,882 | 77 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,620 | 94 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,794 | 82 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,688 | 93 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,639 | 94 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,496 | 106 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,654 | 86 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,354 | 111 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,349 | 108 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,538 | 83 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,258 | 108 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #1,277 | 104 |
| 2000 | — | #1,196 | 113 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,241 | 100 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,449 | 78 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,274 | 90 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,206 | 93 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,286 | 83 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,383 | 71 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,554 | 58 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,429 | 64 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,282 | 76 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,012 | 37 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,398 | 61 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,618 | 44 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,400 | 52 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,962 | 30 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,710 | 18 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,459 | 12 | |
| 1983 | — | #5,484 | 6 | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | #6,262 | 5 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,940 | 7 | |
| 1979 | — | #5,355 | 6 | |
| 1978 | — | #4,157 | 8 | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | #4,935 | 6 | |
| 1975 | — | #4,309 | 7 | |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jalil! It came in at #5,227, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1977, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jalil is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Jersey#412 · 1 in 3,424
- Alabama#600 · 1 in 5,060
- Pennsylvania#619 · 1 in 6,575
- Virginia#688 · 1 in 6,840
- New York#731 · 1 in 7,161
Best ever in a state: #216 in District of Columbia, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #412 | 14 | 1 in 3,424 |
| Alabama | #600 | 5 | 1 in 5,060 |
| Pennsylvania | #619 | 10 | 1 in 6,575 |
| Virginia | #688 | 6 | 1 in 6,840 |
| New York | #731 | 16 | 1 in 7,161 |
| North Carolina | #928 | 5 | 1 in 10,346 |
| Michigan | #948 | 5 | 1 in 11,856 |
| Florida | #1,037 | 7 | 1 in 12,756 |
| Georgia | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 11,080 |
| Illinois | #1,078 | 6 | 1 in 13,408 |
| Texas | #1,801 | 5 | 1 in 34,285 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jalil
- 564 spots since 2024 (#4,321 → #3,757)
- 1,590 spots since 2020 (#2,167 → #3,757)
- 1,157 spots since 2015 (#2,600 → #3,757)
- Debuted 1974
- Peaked 2000 at #1,196 (113 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 17,381 boys born in 2000 were named Jalil (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 58,899 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 34.6% of all boys named Jalil (1,006) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 32 | #4,157 (1978) | #4,797 |
| 1980s | 235 | #1,398 (1989) | #3,248 |
| 1990s | 750 | #1,206 (1996) | #1,412 |
| 2000s | 1,006 | #1,196 (2000) | #1,445 |
| 2010s | 651 | #1,620 (2011) | #2,168 |
| 2020s | 236 | #2,167 (2020) | #3,246 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jalil in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 17,381 of them was named Jalil, which outranked 90.1% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,188Marcellus114
- #1,188Sebastien114
- #1,188Wilfredo114
- #1,196Jalil113
- #1,196Abner113
- #1,196Benton113
- #1,196Chancellor113
- #1,208Demonte112
- #1,208Enzo112
- #1,208Kyron112
Tied with 11 names at #1,196; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.