Jamiah
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 87.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2003 · 164 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,460since 1982
Jamiah over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,984 | 37 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,470 | 45 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #3,157 | 51 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #3,388 | 46 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #2,928 | 56 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #2,432 | 74 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #2,426 | 76 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #2,590 | 69 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #2,497 | 72 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #2,385 | 76 | #5,923 | 14 |
| 2012 | #2,356 | 79 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,943 | 102 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #1,783 | 115 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2009 | #1,521 | 149 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #1,704 | 131 | #6,070 | 14 |
| 2007 | #1,517 | 152 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #1,581 | 136 | #6,460 | 12 |
| 2005 | #1,451 | 146 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #1,516 | 133 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #1,272 | 164 | #4,815 | 16 |
| 2002 | #1,934 | 91 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #2,331 | 68 | #4,890 | 15 |
| 2000 | #2,593 | 57 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #2,640 | 53 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | #3,116 | 40 | #5,840 | 10 |
| 1997 | #2,776 | 44 | #4,451 | 14 |
| 1996 | #4,739 | 21 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #4,564 | 12 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #3,813 | 15 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jamiah! It came in at #9,237, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1983–1989, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jamiah is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#225 · 1 in 902
- Alabama#487 · 1 in 2,421
- South Carolina#561 · 1 in 2,854
- Georgia#564 · 1 in 2,972
- Tennessee#606 · 1 in 3,385
Best ever in a state: #225 in Mississippi, 2004.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #225 | 13 | 1 in 902 |
| Alabama | #487 | 8 | 1 in 2,421 |
| South Carolina | #561 | 6 | 1 in 2,854 |
| Georgia | #564 | 17 | 1 in 2,972 |
| Tennessee | #606 | 9 | 1 in 3,385 |
| Missouri | #612 | 8 | 1 in 3,548 |
| Virginia | #1,052 | 5 | 1 in 7,396 |
| North Carolina | #1,241 | 5 | 1 in 8,890 |
| Illinois | #1,255 | 7 | 1 in 9,785 |
| Florida | #1,330 | 8 | 1 in 10,251 |
| Texas | #2,512 | 6 | 1 in 26,547 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jamiah
- 1,081 spots since 2024 (#4,473 → #5,554)
- 2,216 spots since 2020 (#3,338 → #5,554)
- 2,964 spots since 2015 (#2,590 → #5,554)
- Debuted 1982
- Peaked 2003 at #1,272 (164 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 11,141 girls born in 2003 were named Jamiah (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 49.9% of all girls named Jamiah (1,227) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1991, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 6 | #9,237 (1982) | #9,237 |
| 1990s | 230 | #2,640 (1999) | #5,640 |
| 2000s | 1,227 | #1,272 (2003) | #1,742 |
| 2010s | 765 | #1,783 (2010) | #2,473 |
| 2020s | 232 | #3,157 (2021) | #3,996 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jamiah in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
Top boys' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 13,806 of them was named Jamiah, which outranked 92.0% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,984,979 boys got a published name in 2004; 1 in 165,415 of them was named Jamiah, which outranked 53.6% of the 13,228 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #5,813Zaylen13
- #5,813Zein13
- #5,813Zyion13
- #6,138Jamiah12
- #6,138Aashish12
- #6,138Abdalla12
- #6,138Abijah12
- #6,520Aadarsh11
- #6,520Aadyn11
- #6,520Aaliyah11
Tied with 381 names at #6,138; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.