Jaylon
Last seen for girls in 2015 at #16,419 · #1,808 for boys in 2025, 88 births
Given to boys 97.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2002 · 646 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 10,190since 1976
Jaylon over time
Rank among boys' names. Jaylon has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,808 | 88 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,820 | 89 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,608 | 108 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,457 | 124 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,424 | 128 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,280 | 143 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,239 | 152 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,335 | 135 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,264 | 144 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,203 | 157 | |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | #1,134 | 167 |
| 2014 | — | #1,097 | 174 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,090 | 170 | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | #993 | 200 |
| 2011 | — | #906 | 223 | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #749 | 303 |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | #637 | 393 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #602 | 417 |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | #562 | 458 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #482 | 548 |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #475 | 528 |
| 2004 | #6,768 | 17 | #426 | 613 |
| 2003 | #6,055 | 19 | #426 | 601 |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 | #398 | 646 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | #418 | 599 |
| 2000 | #5,937 | 18 | #429 | 568 |
| 1999 | #6,836 | 14 | #455 | 505 |
| 1998 | #6,360 | 15 | #490 | 445 |
| 1997 | #5,228 | 19 | #554 | 349 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #599 | 296 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #687 | 238 |
| 1994 | #5,445 | 17 | #757 | 193 |
| 1993 | #8,719 | 9 | #1,091 | 105 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #1,731 | 49 |
| 1991 | — | #5,942 | 8 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,952 | 21 | |
| 1989 | — | #4,811 | 10 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,915 | 12 | |
| 1987 | — | #5,459 | 7 | |
| 1986 | — | #5,332 | 7 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,052 | 10 | |
| 1984 | — | #4,973 | 7 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,141 | 9 | |
| 1982 | — | #6,385 | 5 | |
| 1981 | — | #6,262 | 5 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,838 | 10 | |
| 1979 | — | #5,355 | 6 | |
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | — | #4,935 | 6 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jaylon! It came in at #4,935, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1976–1979, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaylon is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#54 · 1 in 251
- Arkansas#140 · 1 in 620
- Louisiana#145 · 1 in 665
- Alabama#149 · 1 in 767
- Tennessee#167 · 1 in 913
Best ever in a state: #54 in Mississippi, 2000.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #54 | 62 | 1 in 251 |
| Arkansas | #140 | 24 | 1 in 620 |
| Louisiana | #145 | 41 | 1 in 665 |
| Alabama | #149 | 33 | 1 in 767 |
| Tennessee | #167 | 40 | 1 in 913 |
| Georgia | #200 | 53 | 1 in 1,045 |
| South Carolina | #308 | 12 | 1 in 1,742 |
| Texas | #310 | 99 | 1 in 1,732 |
| North Carolina | #322 | 26 | 1 in 1,990 |
| Oklahoma | #362 | 9 | 1 in 2,290 |
| Missouri | #415 | 10 | 1 in 3,437 |
| Indiana | #424 | 11 | 1 in 3,575 |
| Michigan | #448 | 15 | 1 in 3,952 |
| Wisconsin | #465 | 7 | 1 in 4,219 |
| Illinois | #520 | 19 | 1 in 4,234 |
| Florida | #535 | 21 | 1 in 4,252 |
| Virginia | #583 | 8 | 1 in 5,130 |
| Ohio | #673 | 9 | 1 in 7,838 |
| New Jersey | #748 | 6 | 1 in 7,988 |
| New York | #993 | 10 | 1 in 11,457 |
| California | #994 | 16 | 1 in 15,493 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaylon
- 12 spots since 2024 (#1,820 → #1,808)
- 528 spots since 2020 (#1,280 → #1,808)
- 674 spots since 2015 (#1,134 → #1,808)
- Biggest jump: 334 spots in 1994 (#1,091 → #757)
- Biggest drop: 157 spots in 2011 (#749 → #906)
- Debuted 1976
- Peaked 2002 at #398 (646 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 1994–2012
- Highest: 1 in 3,005 boys born in 2002 were named Jaylon (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,410 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 52.7% of all boys named Jaylon (5,371) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23 | #4,935 (1976) | #5,296 |
| 1980s | 82 | #3,838 (1980) | #4,917 |
| 1990s | 2,209 | #455 (1999) | #1,526 |
| 2000s | 5,371 | #398 (2002) | #486 |
| 2010s | 1,825 | #749 (2010) | #1,101 |
| 2020s | 680 | #1,280 (2020) | #1,566 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jaylon in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 100,891 of them was named Jaylon, which outranked 66.4% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #5,705Yatzary19
- #5,705Zissy19
- #5,705Zoriah19
- #5,937Jaylon18
- #5,937Abreanna18
- #5,937Adalee18
- #5,937Adriann18
- #6,208Abagayle17
- #6,208Abbygayle17
- #6,208Abigayl17
Tied with 270 names at #5,937; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 3,458 of them was named Jaylon, which outranked 96.5% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.