Malik
Last seen for girls in 2014 at #14,558 · #437 for boys in 2025, 724 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1996 · 4,026 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 49,607since 1949
Malik over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #437 | 724 | |
| 2024 | — | #428 | 740 | |
| 2023 | — | #383 | 835 | |
| 2022 | — | #394 | 808 | |
| 2021 | — | #392 | 810 | |
| 2020 | — | #373 | 838 | |
| 2019 | — | #363 | 886 | |
| 2018 | — | #373 | 874 | |
| 2017 | — | #378 | 869 | |
| 2016 | — | #382 | 844 | |
| 2015 | — | #375 | 862 | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | #372 | 842 |
| 2013 | — | #341 | 940 | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #340 | 913 |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 | #322 | 988 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | #283 | 1,192 |
| 2009 | — | #255 | 1,359 | |
| 2008 | — | #280 | 1,218 | |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #273 | 1,255 |
| 2006 | — | #289 | 1,191 | |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #265 | 1,253 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #243 | 1,377 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #229 | 1,506 |
| 2002 | — | #211 | 1,659 | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #197 | 1,864 |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | #176 | 2,084 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #165 | 2,246 |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | #138 | 2,694 |
| 1997 | #5,626 | 17 | #111 | 3,381 |
| 1996 | #4,306 | 24 | #97 | 4,026 |
| 1995 | #3,585 | 30 | #131 | 2,707 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #308 | 853 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #331 | 766 |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 | #394 | 582 |
| 1991 | — | #521 | 368 | |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | #557 | 328 |
| 1989 | — | #671 | 223 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #755 | 158 |
| 1987 | — | #735 | 154 | |
| 1986 | — | #806 | 127 | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #798 | 124 |
| 1984 | — | #818 | 114 | |
| 1983 | — | #813 | 115 | |
| 1982 | — | #834 | 113 | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #760 | 131 |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #665 | 168 |
| 1979 | — | #708 | 147 | |
| 1978 | — | #649 | 167 | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #709 | 144 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #706 | 139 |
| 1975 | — | #750 | 123 | |
| 1974 | — | #769 | 110 | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #718 | 126 |
| 1972 | — | #692 | 134 | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | #719 | 132 |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #732 | 126 |
| 1969 | — | #1,086 | 51 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,258 | 36 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,711 | 21 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,891 | 17 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,982 | 8 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,601 | 6 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,373 | 6 | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Malik! It came in at #3,690, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1949–1951, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Malik is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#22 · 1 in 97
- South Carolina#56 · 1 in 268
- Maryland#70 · 1 in 306
- Mississippi#71 · 1 in 299
- Louisiana#74 · 1 in 324
Best ever in a state: #6 in District of Columbia, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #22 | 50 | 1 in 97 |
| South Carolina | #56 | 78 | 1 in 268 |
| Maryland | #70 | 94 | 1 in 306 |
| Mississippi | #71 | 52 | 1 in 299 |
| Louisiana | #74 | 84 | 1 in 324 |
| Georgia | #92 | 131 | 1 in 423 |
| Virginia | #97 | 86 | 1 in 477 |
| Alabama | #110 | 49 | 1 in 516 |
| North Carolina | #111 | 97 | 1 in 533 |
| New York | #121 | 175 | 1 in 655 |
| Michigan | #125 | 102 | 1 in 581 |
| Illinois | #126 | 145 | 1 in 555 |
| Florida | #130 | 131 | 1 in 682 |
| Tennessee | #140 | 49 | 1 in 746 |
| Connecticut | #142 | 22 | 1 in 826 |
| Delaware | #144 | 6 | 1 in 703 |
| Missouri | #157 | 44 | 1 in 781 |
| Rhode Island | #158 | 6 | 1 in 878 |
| Kentucky | #159 | 28 | 1 in 864 |
| Arkansas | #161 | 20 | 1 in 744 |
| Ohio | #173 | 74 | 1 in 953 |
| New Jersey | #175 | 42 | 1 in 1,141 |
| Pennsylvania | #178 | 62 | 1 in 1,061 |
| Massachusetts | #210 | 23 | 1 in 1,575 |
| Wisconsin | #211 | 24 | 1 in 1,231 |
| Kansas | #213 | 16 | 1 in 1,031 |
| Oklahoma | #223 | 19 | 1 in 1,085 |
| Nebraska | #232 | 9 | 1 in 1,130 |
| Minnesota | #250 | 19 | 1 in 1,544 |
| Indiana | #265 | 23 | 1 in 1,710 |
| Nevada | #275 | 9 | 1 in 1,376 |
| California | #296 | 128 | 1 in 1,937 |
| Texas | #312 | 98 | 1 in 1,749 |
| New Mexico | #327 | 6 | 1 in 1,774 |
| Washington | #332 | 17 | 1 in 2,042 |
| Arizona | #360 | 16 | 1 in 2,370 |
| Oregon | #360 | 9 | 1 in 2,198 |
| Iowa | #405 | 5 | 1 in 3,330 |
| Colorado | #412 | 10 | 1 in 2,842 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Malik
- 9 spots since 2024 (#428 → #437)
- 64 spots since 2020 (#373 → #437)
- 62 spots since 2015 (#375 → #437)
- Biggest jump: 354 spots in 1970 (#1,086 → #732)
- Biggest drop: 95 spots in 1981 (#665 → #760)
- Debuted 1949
- Peaked 1996 at #97 (4,026 births)
- Births halved by 2001, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 1996
- Top 1,000: 56 yrs · run 1970–2025
- Highest: 1 in 471 boys born in 1996 were named Malik (0.21%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,359 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 36.2% of all boys named Malik (17,951) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #3,690 (1949) | #3,690 |
| 1950s | 6 | #3,373 (1952) | #3,373 |
| 1960s | 139 | #1,086 (1969) | #2,088 |
| 1970s | 1,348 | #649 (1978) | #715 |
| 1980s | 1,427 | #665 (1980) | #766 |
| 1990s | 17,951 | #97 (1996) | #275 |
| 2000s | 14,766 | #176 (2000) | #242 |
| 2010s | 9,210 | #283 (2010) | #353 |
| 2020s | 4,755 | #373 (2020) | #401 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Malik in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 129,717 of them was named Malik, which outranked 59.5% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #6,808Zianna15
- #6,808Zurisadai15
- #6,808Zyanya15
- #7,158Malik14
- #7,158Adalynn14
- #7,158Adamarys14
- #7,158Adanna14
- #7,580Aalayah13
- #7,580Aaniyah13
- #7,580Abbegail13
Tied with 421 names at #7,158; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 942 of them was named Malik, which outranked 98.5% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.