Marlen

#3,577 for girls in 2025, 42 births · #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
Given to girls 85.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2003 · 259 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
5,512
since 1932

Marlen over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202000peak #918, 2003peak #1,310, 1938girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,57742#10,6956
2024#3,51644—
2023#3,52544#12,2395
2022#3,36547—
2021#3,11252#12,1465
2020#2,89056#12,0225
2019#3,04353—
2018#2,96255#8,8198
2017#2,96455—
2016#2,73963—
2015#2,81062—
2014#2,92258—
2013#2,30580#8,1189
2012#2,06493—
2011#1,758116#12,2875
2010#1,584138#8,1399
2009#1,392170#8,9858
2008#1,193213#6,76312
2007#1,003263#12,3675
2006#1,119224#9,5857
2005#1,041230#6,63411
2004#1,067216#6,97610
2003#918259#5,55813
2002#1,063200—
2001#1,136184#6,44510
2000#999212#9,1126
1999#1,442121#7,1398
1998#1,226149#4,87313
1997#1,362126#5,64210
1996#1,155157#5,53510
1995#1,235138#3,69317
1994#1,191148#6,9687
1993#1,352122#5,7719
1992#1,248139#5,23610
1991#1,328124#4,23113
1990#1,397113#5,8238
1989#1,92567#5,6158
1988#2,03258#4,7869
1987#2,53140#6,0896
1986#2,47040#5,9266
1985#2,48439#5,7856
1984#2,22744#4,9737
1983#2,15645—
1982#1,90056#5,0037
1981#2,40940#4,5098
1980#2,24644#4,9407
1979#2,43038—
1978#2,74130—
1977#3,26723#4,1648
1976#2,79227#2,82614
1975#2,88125#2,90213
1974#3,31320#3,31810
1973#3,12221#2,40516
1972#3,54317#2,24317
1971#4,53412#2,68613
1970#3,71216#3,07110
1969#3,77414—
1968#3,31516#4,1365
1967#3,65613#3,5596
1966#3,55813#2,7849
1965#4,20210—
1964#2,75221#3,0508
1963#3,63513#3,3187
1962#4,01111#3,6406
1961#4,8828#3,6526
1960#5,1687#2,8719
1959—#3,9885
1958#5,4086#3,0338
1957#5,3776#2,8229
1956#3,91010#2,62810
1955#5,8285#2,43511
1954—#3,4526
1953—#2,28712
1952——
1951#5,4145#2,8448
1950——
1949—#2,45310
1948#4,6516#3,6685
1947#4,3457#2,07614
1946#3,6658#2,6908
1945#4,0256#2,00912
1944—#3,4305
1943—#2,5639
1942#3,4448#2,5239
1941#3,0309#1,68517
1940—#2,32210
1939—#2,4499
1938#4,3425#1,31026
1937#2,9409#2,08812
1936#2,8579#1,38423
1935—#1,65618
1934#4,2865#1,78316
1933#3,1098#2,21411
1932#3,9016#2,19112
1931—#2,20712
1930—#2,29312
1929—#2,9808
1928—#2,52211
1927—#2,03416
1926—#3,7086
1925—#2,01216
1924—#2,47312
1923—#4,2395
1922—#2,34713
1921—#2,05916
1920—#2,76510
1919—#3,3917
1918—#3,3687
1917—#3,5456
1916—#3,8975
1915—#2,6219
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1932

The first year at least five girls were named Marlen! It came in at #3,901, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1934–1935, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Marlen is popular in 2000

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedNHWashington: #882 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,873 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMNIllinois: #437 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 2,544 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMINew York: #2,061 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 20,086 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #648 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 4,304 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedDEArizona: #491 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,457 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #717 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,010 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedALGeorgia: #886 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,007 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marlen, so not publishedHITexas: #537 for girls · 47 births · 1 in 3,259 girlsTXFlorida: #1,472 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 12,885 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Illinois#437 · 1 in 2,544
  2. Arizona#491 · 1 in 2,457
  3. Texas#537 · 1 in 3,259
  4. California#648 · 1 in 4,304
  5. North Carolina#717 · 1 in 5,010

Best ever in a state: #437 in Illinois, 2000.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Illinois#437281 in 2,544
Arizona#491131 in 2,457
Texas#537471 in 3,259
California#648521 in 4,304
North Carolina#71791 in 5,010
Washington#88251 in 5,873
Georgia#88681 in 6,007
Florida#1,47261 in 12,885
New York#2,06151 in 20,086
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marlen
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 61 spots since 2024 (#3,516 → #3,577)
  • 687 spots since 2020 (#2,890 → #3,577)
  • 767 spots since 2015 (#2,810 → #3,577)
  • Biggest jump: 443 spots in 2000 (#1,442 → #999)
  • Biggest drop: 149 spots in 2004 (#918 → #1,067)
Rise & fade · girls
71 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1932
  • Peaked 2003 at #918 (259 births)
  • Births halved by 2011, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 2 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 2 yrs · 2000–2003
Share of babies · girls
1 in 7,055
  • Highest: 1 in 7,055 girls born in 2003 were named Marlen (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 38,268 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 39.4% of all girls named Marlen (2,171) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1972
  • Mostly boys until 1971, mostly girls since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1930s42#2,857 (1936)#3,573
1940s44#3,030 (1941)#3,860
1950s32#3,910 (1956)#5,187
1960s126#2,752 (1964)#3,895
1970s229#2,430 (1979)#3,234
1980s473#1,900 (1982)#2,238
1990s1,337#1,155 (1996)#1,294
2000s2,171#918 (2003)#1,093
2010s773#1,584 (2010)#2,515
2020s285#2,890 (2020)#3,331

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marlen in 2000

girls
#999
212 births · 1 in 8,566 girls
boys
#9,112
6 births · 1 in 327,334 boys

Top girls' names in 2000

  1. #1Emily25,959
  2. #2Hannah23,087
  3. #3Madison19,968
  4. #4Ashley18,000
  5. #5Sarah17,715
  6. #6Alexis17,631
  7. #7Samantha17,265
  8. #8Jessica15,711
  9. #9Elizabeth15,117
  10. #10Taylor15,080
  11. #999Marlen212

Top boys' names in 2000

  1. #1Jacob34,492
  2. #2Michael32,045
  3. #3Matthew28,580
  4. #4Joshua27,543
  5. #5Christopher24,936
  6. #6Nicholas24,653
  7. #7Andrew23,658
  8. #8Joseph22,844
  9. #9Daniel22,338
  10. #10Tyler21,506
  11. #9,112Marlen6
More about 2000

girls

1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 8,566 of them was named Marlen, which outranked 94.3% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlen
  1. #994Kenia213
  2. #994Maiya213
  3. #994Melisa213
  4. #999Marlen212
  5. #999Adrian212
  6. #999Shianne212
  7. #1,002Alysia211
  8. #1,002Audra211
  9. #1,002Jacquelin211

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1999
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,528Laisha#3,509 → #981
  2. ↑ 2,131Litzy#2,527 → #396
  3. ↑ 2,096Cielo#2,991 → #895
  4. ↑ 1,864Yamilet#2,703 → #839
  5. ↑ 1,775Nyah#2,567 → #792
Fallers
  1. ↓ 560Tatyanna#951 → #1,511
  2. ↓ 529Jailene#506 → #1,035
  3. ↓ 431Shanice#727 → #1,158
  4. ↓ 384Chantal#921 → #1,305
  5. ↓ 348Infant#658 → #1,006

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 327,334 of them was named Marlen, which outranked 24.8% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marlen
  1. #8,209Zuhayr7
  2. #8,209Zyad7
  3. #8,209Zykeith7
  4. #9,112Marlen6
  5. #9,112Aadam6
  6. #9,112Aahil6
  7. #9,112Aarin6
  8. #10,349Aadarsh5
  9. #10,349Aaronjacob5
  10. #10,349Aaronjoshua5

Tied with 1,236 names at #9,112; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1999
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,806Maximus#5,656 → #850
  2. ↑ 2,950Elian#3,376 → #426
  3. ↑ 438Axel#799 → #361
  4. ↑ 437Luca#1,063 → #626
  5. ↑ 403Jevon#1,039 → #636
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,334Trajan#996 → #2,330
  2. ↓ 498Jordi#743 → #1,241
  3. ↓ 322Auston#931 → #1,253
  4. ↓ 298Tyreke#737 → #1,035
  5. ↓ 274Tahj#863 → #1,137

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2000 →