Mckenzie
#576 for girls in 2025, 517 births · #7,194 for boys in 2025, 11 births
Given to girls 96.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2000 · 2,528 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 64,779since 1975
Mckenzie over time
Rank among girls' names. Mckenzie has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #576 | 517 | #7,194 | 11 |
| 2024 | #493 | 622 | #6,469 | 13 |
| 2023 | #437 | 710 | #9,763 | 7 |
| 2022 | #357 | 885 | #8,300 | 9 |
| 2021 | #331 | 991 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | #278 | 1,136 | #9,554 | 7 |
| 2019 | #236 | 1,325 | #6,104 | 14 |
| 2018 | #203 | 1,521 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #186 | 1,661 | #4,746 | 20 |
| 2016 | #156 | 1,999 | #5,318 | 17 |
| 2015 | #151 | 2,140 | #6,676 | 12 |
| 2014 | #145 | 2,322 | #3,891 | 26 |
| 2013 | #140 | 2,219 | #4,313 | 22 |
| 2012 | #151 | 2,122 | #4,862 | 19 |
| 2011 | #136 | 2,246 | #3,885 | 26 |
| 2010 | #145 | 2,133 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2009 | #155 | 2,066 | #3,274 | 34 |
| 2008 | #151 | 2,288 | #3,744 | 28 |
| 2007 | #160 | 2,233 | #3,025 | 38 |
| 2006 | #166 | 2,129 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #163 | 2,078 | #2,902 | 36 |
| 2004 | #151 | 2,184 | #2,376 | 47 |
| 2003 | #149 | 2,251 | #2,922 | 33 |
| 2002 | #143 | 2,341 | #2,632 | 36 |
| 2001 | #135 | 2,471 | #2,151 | 48 |
| 2000 | #133 | 2,528 | #1,830 | 58 |
| 1999 | #141 | 2,284 | #1,545 | 72 |
| 1998 | #142 | 2,243 | #1,301 | 91 |
| 1997 | #150 | 2,068 | #1,284 | 89 |
| 1996 | #158 | 1,978 | #1,025 | 120 |
| 1995 | #165 | 1,808 | #1,053 | 113 |
| 1994 | #192 | 1,541 | #1,113 | 103 |
| 1993 | #225 | 1,240 | #1,080 | 107 |
| 1992 | #290 | 950 | #1,210 | 86 |
| 1991 | #379 | 677 | #1,254 | 79 |
| 1990 | #490 | 497 | #1,306 | 72 |
| 1989 | #589 | 372 | #1,411 | 60 |
| 1988 | #581 | 351 | #1,307 | 62 |
| 1987 | #628 | 305 | #1,295 | 57 |
| 1986 | #758 | 228 | #1,617 | 40 |
| 1985 | #874 | 183 | #1,834 | 32 |
| 1984 | #930 | 158 | #1,507 | 41 |
| 1983 | #1,044 | 133 | #2,085 | 25 |
| 1982 | #1,198 | 113 | #1,815 | 31 |
| 1981 | #1,139 | 120 | #1,548 | 39 |
| 1980 | #1,502 | 79 | #1,569 | 38 |
| 1979 | #1,251 | 102 | #1,833 | 30 |
| 1978 | #1,194 | 105 | #1,834 | 28 |
| 1977 | #1,370 | 82 | #1,707 | 31 |
| 1976 | #2,174 | 39 | #2,329 | 19 |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #3,246 | 11 |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | #4,724 | 5 | |
| 1969 | — | #4,404 | 5 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | #2,780 | 9 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,050 | 8 | |
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,640 | 6 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,652 | 6 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,665 | 6 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #3,944 | 5 | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,425 | 6 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,680 | 9 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,066 | 7 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,010 | 7 | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | #2,996 | 6 | |
| 1944 | — | #3,109 | 6 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,732 | 8 | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,268 | 6 | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | #4,201 | 5 | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | #3,532 | 7 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | #3,208 | 8 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,877 | 9 | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,981 | 5 | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Mckenzie! It came in at #9,067, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1975, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Mckenzie is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wyoming#27 · 1 in 105
- North Dakota#28 · 1 in 115
- South Dakota#33 · 1 in 131
- Utah#45 · 1 in 233
- Oregon#49 · 1 in 242
Best ever in a state: #15 in North Dakota, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #27 | 12 | 1 in 105 |
| North Dakota | #28 | 21 | 1 in 115 |
| South Dakota | #33 | 22 | 1 in 131 |
| Utah | #45 | 73 | 1 in 233 |
| Oregon | #49 | 68 | 1 in 242 |
| West Virginia | #50 | 36 | 1 in 202 |
| Montana | #60 | 15 | 1 in 195 |
| Idaho | #62 | 25 | 1 in 243 |
| Arkansas | #63 | 44 | 1 in 277 |
| Kentucky | #63 | 72 | 1 in 284 |
| Oklahoma | #67 | 54 | 1 in 311 |
| Tennessee | #67 | 103 | 1 in 302 |
| North Carolina | #74 | 121 | 1 in 373 |
| Louisiana | #75 | 64 | 1 in 342 |
| Alabama | #76 | 58 | 1 in 364 |
| Maine | #80 | 15 | 1 in 300 |
| Mississippi | #82 | 34 | 1 in 354 |
| Washington | #86 | 71 | 1 in 414 |
| Missouri | #87 | 78 | 1 in 377 |
| Ohio | #87 | 154 | 1 in 403 |
| Virginia | #88 | 82 | 1 in 433 |
| South Carolina | #89 | 44 | 1 in 384 |
| Wisconsin | #89 | 67 | 1 in 381 |
| Nebraska | #90 | 23 | 1 in 363 |
| Iowa | #91 | 38 | 1 in 373 |
| Minnesota | #94 | 61 | 1 in 420 |
| Indiana | #102 | 73 | 1 in 456 |
| Michigan | #103 | 106 | 1 in 491 |
| Alaska | #111 | 7 | 1 in 327 |
| Georgia | #112 | 86 | 1 in 559 |
| Vermont | #117 | 5 | 1 in 348 |
| Kansas | #121 | 28 | 1 in 476 |
| New Hampshire | #138 | 9 | 1 in 509 |
| Pennsylvania | #144 | 84 | 1 in 691 |
| Arizona | #171 | 44 | 1 in 726 |
| Florida | #175 | 89 | 1 in 869 |
| Nevada | #178 | 14 | 1 in 679 |
| Maryland | #179 | 30 | 1 in 820 |
| Colorado | #182 | 32 | 1 in 752 |
| Hawaii | #206 | 6 | 1 in 600 |
| Illinois | #221 | 67 | 1 in 1,063 |
| Texas | #223 | 143 | 1 in 1,071 |
| Connecticut | #227 | 14 | 1 in 1,084 |
| New Mexico | #229 | 10 | 1 in 815 |
| New York | #261 | 70 | 1 in 1,435 |
| Massachusetts | #267 | 23 | 1 in 1,365 |
| New Jersey | #381 | 19 | 1 in 2,198 |
| California | #390 | 108 | 1 in 2,073 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mckenzie
- 83 spots since 2024 (#493 → #576)
- 298 spots since 2020 (#278 → #576)
- 425 spots since 2015 (#151 → #576)
- Biggest jump: 130 spots in 1987 (#758 → #628)
- Biggest drop: 83 spots in 2025 (#493 → #576)
- Debuted 1975
- Peaked 2000 at #133 (2,528 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 42 yrs · run 1984–2025
- Highest: 1 in 718 girls born in 2000 were named Mckenzie (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,109 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 34.8% of all girls named Mckenzie (22,569) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 333 | #1,194 (1978) | #3,011 |
| 1980s | 2,042 | #581 (1988) | #924 |
| 1990s | 15,286 | #141 (1999) | #233 |
| 2000s | 22,569 | #133 (2000) | #151 |
| 2010s | 19,688 | #136 (2011) | #165 |
| 2020s | 4,861 | #278 (2020) | #412 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mckenzie in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 718 of them was named Mckenzie, which outranked 99.2% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 33,862 of them was named Mckenzie, which outranked 84.9% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,815Marley59
- #1,815Terell59
- #1,815Trysten59
- #1,830Mckenzie58
- #1,830Abelardo58
- #1,830Anas58
- #1,830Brando58
- #1,848Abdulrahman57
- #1,848Antione57
- #1,848Arath57
Tied with 17 names at #1,830; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.