Oaklee
#535 for girls in 2025, 565 births · #2,006 for boys in 2025, 75 births
Given to girls 84.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 687 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,576since 1999
Oaklee over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #535 | 565 | #2,006 | 75 |
| 2024 | #515 | 598 | #1,938 | 81 |
| 2023 | #445 | 687 | #1,608 | 108 |
| 2022 | #465 | 682 | #1,504 | 120 |
| 2021 | #487 | 645 | #1,658 | 100 |
| 2020 | #623 | 470 | #1,922 | 76 |
| 2019 | #756 | 371 | #1,790 | 86 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #1,856 | 81 |
| 2017 | #942 | 280 | #2,154 | 63 |
| 2016 | #1,197 | 208 | #2,518 | 50 |
| 2015 | #1,454 | 158 | #2,528 | 49 |
| 2014 | #1,876 | 107 | #2,847 | 41 |
| 2013 | #1,834 | 110 | #3,661 | 28 |
| 2012 | #2,401 | 77 | #4,686 | 20 |
| 2011 | #2,695 | 65 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #3,203 | 51 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2009 | #3,409 | 48 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,840 | 18 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,077 | 16 | — | |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | — | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklee! It came in at #12,688, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1999–2000, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklee is popular in 2018
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#100 · 1 in 417
- Idaho#209 · 1 in 666
- South Dakota#222 · 1 in 612
- Kansas#295 · 1 in 1,096
- Missouri#329 · 1 in 1,325
Best ever in a state: #28 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #100 | 40 | 1 in 417 |
| Idaho | #209 | 9 | 1 in 666 |
| South Dakota | #222 | 5 | 1 in 612 |
| Kansas | #295 | 11 | 1 in 1,096 |
| Missouri | #329 | 20 | 1 in 1,325 |
| Arkansas | #384 | 8 | 1 in 1,377 |
| Oklahoma | #385 | 11 | 1 in 1,423 |
| Ohio | #451 | 25 | 1 in 2,041 |
| Kentucky | #467 | 9 | 1 in 1,971 |
| Indiana | #509 | 13 | 1 in 2,286 |
| Arizona | #638 | 10 | 1 in 2,939 |
| Wisconsin | #660 | 7 | 1 in 3,179 |
| Colorado | #675 | 7 | 1 in 3,181 |
| Louisiana | #741 | 6 | 1 in 3,264 |
| Tennessee | #761 | 8 | 1 in 3,897 |
| North Carolina | #836 | 10 | 1 in 4,501 |
| Washington | #840 | 7 | 1 in 4,344 |
| Minnesota | #875 | 5 | 1 in 4,698 |
| Michigan | #905 | 8 | 1 in 5,031 |
| Pennsylvania | #926 | 9 | 1 in 5,589 |
| Illinois | #1,353 | 6 | 1 in 8,922 |
| Florida | #1,453 | 8 | 1 in 10,636 |
| Texas | #1,570 | 14 | 1 in 11,351 |
| California | #2,245 | 9 | 1 in 21,053 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklee
- 20 spots since 2024 (#515 → #535)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#623 → #535)
- 919 spots since 2015 (#1,454 → #535)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2017 (#1,197 → #942)
- Biggest drop: 70 spots in 2024 (#445 → #515)
- Debuted 1999
- Peaked 2023 at #445 (687 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,336 girls born in 2023 were named Oaklee (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,845 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 65.4% of all girls named Oaklee (3,647) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | #12,688 (1999) | #12,688 |
| 2000s | 180 | #3,409 (2009) | #8,762 |
| 2010s | 1,743 | #756 (2019) | #1,721 |
| 2020s | 3,647 | #445 (2023) | #512 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oaklee in 2018
Top girls' names in 2018
Top boys' names in 2018
More about 2018
girls
1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 5,383 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 95.3% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,816,158 boys got a published name in 2018; 1 in 22,422 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 86.9% of the 14,118 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,838West82
- #1,838Yousuf82
- #1,838Zymir82
- #1,856Oaklee81
- #1,856Abe81
- #1,856Asaiah81
- #1,856Bayron81
- #1,872Aariz80
- #1,872Ashtyn80
- #1,872Austen80
Tied with 15 names at #1,856; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.