Oaklee
#535 for girls in 2025, 565 births · #2,006 for boys in 2025, 75 births
Given to girls 84.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 687 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,576since 1999
Oaklee over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #535 | 565 | #2,006 | 75 |
| 2024 | #515 | 598 | #1,938 | 81 |
| 2023 | #445 | 687 | #1,608 | 108 |
| 2022 | #465 | 682 | #1,504 | 120 |
| 2021 | #487 | 645 | #1,658 | 100 |
| 2020 | #623 | 470 | #1,922 | 76 |
| 2019 | #756 | 371 | #1,790 | 86 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #1,856 | 81 |
| 2017 | #942 | 280 | #2,154 | 63 |
| 2016 | #1,197 | 208 | #2,518 | 50 |
| 2015 | #1,454 | 158 | #2,528 | 49 |
| 2014 | #1,876 | 107 | #2,847 | 41 |
| 2013 | #1,834 | 110 | #3,661 | 28 |
| 2012 | #2,401 | 77 | #4,686 | 20 |
| 2011 | #2,695 | 65 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #3,203 | 51 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2009 | #3,409 | 48 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,840 | 18 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,077 | 16 | — | |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | — | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklee! It came in at #12,688, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1999–2000, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklee is popular in 2020
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Montana#74 · 1 in 248
- Utah#110 · 1 in 448
- Idaho#147 · 1 in 509
- South Dakota#196 · 1 in 529
- Arkansas#255 · 1 in 939
Best ever in a state: #28 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana | #74 | 10 | 1 in 248 |
| Utah | #110 | 36 | 1 in 448 |
| Idaho | #147 | 12 | 1 in 509 |
| South Dakota | #196 | 5 | 1 in 529 |
| Arkansas | #255 | 11 | 1 in 939 |
| Iowa | #263 | 12 | 1 in 960 |
| Missouri | #269 | 23 | 1 in 1,064 |
| Indiana | #275 | 26 | 1 in 1,077 |
| Kansas | #292 | 11 | 1 in 1,041 |
| Tennessee | #332 | 22 | 1 in 1,380 |
| Minnesota | #367 | 14 | 1 in 1,547 |
| Oklahoma | #386 | 10 | 1 in 1,478 |
| Kentucky | #391 | 11 | 1 in 1,536 |
| Wisconsin | #396 | 13 | 1 in 1,598 |
| Ohio | #444 | 24 | 1 in 1,996 |
| Oregon | #467 | 7 | 1 in 1,870 |
| Alabama | #515 | 9 | 1 in 2,079 |
| North Carolina | #541 | 18 | 1 in 2,424 |
| Washington | #553 | 12 | 1 in 2,427 |
| Colorado | #556 | 9 | 1 in 2,394 |
| Michigan | #584 | 14 | 1 in 2,704 |
| Pennsylvania | #708 | 14 | 1 in 3,454 |
| Louisiana | #727 | 6 | 1 in 3,083 |
| Georgia | #766 | 12 | 1 in 3,707 |
| Maryland | #804 | 6 | 1 in 3,719 |
| Arizona | #830 | 7 | 1 in 3,951 |
| Texas | #908 | 31 | 1 in 4,934 |
| Virginia | #1,161 | 5 | 1 in 6,828 |
| Florida | #1,181 | 11 | 1 in 7,314 |
| Illinois | #1,190 | 7 | 1 in 6,965 |
| California | #1,335 | 19 | 1 in 9,169 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklee
- 20 spots since 2024 (#515 → #535)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#623 → #535)
- 919 spots since 2015 (#1,454 → #535)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2017 (#1,197 → #942)
- Biggest drop: 70 spots in 2024 (#445 → #515)
- Debuted 1999
- Peaked 2023 at #445 (687 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,336 girls born in 2023 were named Oaklee (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,845 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 65.4% of all girls named Oaklee (3,647) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | #12,688 (1999) | #12,688 |
| 2000s | 180 | #3,409 (2009) | #8,762 |
| 2010s | 1,743 | #756 (2019) | #1,721 |
| 2020s | 3,647 | #445 (2023) | #512 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oaklee in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
Top boys' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 3,439 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 96.4% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,726,076 boys got a published name in 2020; 1 in 22,712 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 86.3% of the 14,060 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,911Raziel77
- #1,911Triton77
- #1,911Yazan77
- #1,922Oaklee76
- #1,922Abdirahman76
- #1,922Asad76
- #1,922Chaz76
- #1,937Adnan75
- #1,937Armon75
- #1,937Atharva75
Tied with 14 names at #1,922; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 380Vivaan#875 → #1,255
- ↓ 282Alexzander#890 → #1,172
- ↓ 268Reyansh#806 → #1,074
- ↓ 266Javion#949 → #1,215
- ↓ 224Kenny#862 → #1,086
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.