Rhea

#639 for girls in 2025, 452 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 98.0% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1893 · 56 births
Debut · girls
7 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
19,737
since 1882

Rhea over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Rhea has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202006peak #360, 1893girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#639452—
2024#613487—
2023#527577—
2022#600500—
2021#614485—
2020#625464—
2019#703411—
2018#756360—
2017#860318—
2016#947289—
2015#994271—
2014#1,092233—
2013#1,111219—
2012#1,096225—
2011#1,189202—
2010#1,165208—
2009#1,174214—
2008#1,250201—
2007#1,147223—
2006#1,167208—
2005#1,305170—
2004#908266#11,3565
2003#1,126195—
2002#1,008217—
2001#1,170176—
2000#1,168172—
1999#1,304139—
1998#1,520111—
1997#1,327130—
1996#1,78083—
1995#1,439112—
1994#1,58396—
1993#1,258136—
1992#1,274134—
1991#1,453109—
1990#1,307124—
1989#1,250126—
1988#1,376103—
1987#1,195121—
1986#1,219113—
1985#1,109130—
1984#1,059132—
1983#1,005141—
1982#1,221109—
1981#1,025140—
1980#1,087129—
1979#1,184111—
1978#1,014134—
1977#1,079120—
1976#1,145102#4,9356
1975#1,119104#5,4645
1974#1,28483—
1973#1,23185—
1972#1,32576—
1971#1,22192—
1970#1,29383—
1969#1,16991—
1968#978113—
1967#1,10389—
1966#1,022102#3,5376
1965#1,05599—
1964#1,091100#3,6016
1963#970120—
1962#1,006114#3,6406
1961#1,014114—
1960#1,009113#3,3377
1959#904133—
1958#829150—
1957#865138#3,5526
1956#944114#2,9698
1955#849131#3,8865
1954#910112—
1953#826126#3,1437
1952#836120#2,8758
1951#840113#2,8448
1950#827111#2,5809
1949#779123#3,0197
1948#686146#3,3166
1947#751130#3,0967
1946#716127#2,6908
1945#81087#2,7437
1944#77198#2,4679
1943#736110#2,5639
1942#678121#2,7128
1941#674109—
1940#74186#2,6718
1939#674101—
1938#75684#1,97613
1937#624118#2,9057
1936#611116#3,5495
1935#660100—
1934#656104#3,2776
1933#637106—
1932#606117—
1931#602121#2,10113
1930#619125#2,60910
1929#582139#2,9808
1928#575151#2,27013
1927#643125#2,12115
1926#557162#2,30213
1925#565160#2,01216
1924#594155#2,22914
1923#633135#2,22414
1922#530177#2,34713
1921#529179#2,50212
1920#515184#2,05216
1919#510177#2,15214
1918#529174#3,3687
1917#490181#2,56210
1916#497169#2,7309
1915#469172#2,8298
1914#504123—
1913#468115—
1912#49792—
1911#43089—
1910#52860—
1909#46864—
1908#48855—
1907#45163—
1906#44758—
1905#48549—
1904#46949—
1903#50440#1,0096
1902#41655—
1901#38558—
1900#47551—
1899#37161—
1898#42054—
1897#39753—
1896#37756#1,1015
1895#44041—
1894#40448—
1893#36056—
1892#40144—
1891#52424—
1890#40639—
1889#43031—
1888#55820—
1887#60814—
1886#63313—
1885#65811—
1884#58313—
1883#6928—
1882#7407—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Rhea! It came in at #740, and was given to 7 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.

Where Rhea is popular in 2006

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #718 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,478 girlsMNIllinois: #1,045 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 6,814 girlsILWisconsin: #808 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,036 girlsWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMINew York: #1,000 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 6,435 girlsNYMassachusetts: #735 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,738 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedINOhio: #895 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,367 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,313 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 11,067 girlsPANew Jersey: #432 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,261 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #988 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 6,905 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWVVirginia: #668 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,786 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedDEArizona: #1,070 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,381 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedALGeorgia: #1,561 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,767 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedHITexas: #1,542 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 11,870 girlsTXFlorida: #1,259 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 8,912 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Jersey#432 · 1 in 2,261
  2. Virginia#668 · 1 in 3,786
  3. Minnesota#718 · 1 in 4,478
  4. Massachusetts#735 · 1 in 4,738
  5. Wisconsin#808 · 1 in 5,036

Best ever in a state: #75 in Wyoming, 1921.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Jersey#432181 in 2,261
Virginia#668101 in 3,786
Minnesota#71861 in 4,478
Massachusetts#73561 in 4,738
Wisconsin#80851 in 5,036
Ohio#89591 in 6,367
California#988341 in 6,905
New York#1,000151 in 6,435
Illinois#1,045101 in 6,814
Arizona#1,07061 in 6,381
Florida#1,259101 in 8,912
Pennsylvania#1,31351 in 11,067
Texas#1,542141 in 11,870
Georgia#1,56151 in 10,767
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rhea
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 26 spots since 2024 (#613 → #639)
  • 14 spots since 2020 (#625 → #639)
  • 355 spots since 2015 (#994 → #639)
  • Biggest jump: 218 spots in 2004 (#1,126 → #908)
  • Biggest drop: 397 spots in 2005 (#908 → #1,305)
Rise & fade · girls
11 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1893 at #360 (56 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 92 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1882–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,781
  • Highest: 1 in 2,781 girls born in 2023 were named Rhea (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,556 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
  • Its best rank, #360 in 1893, was only 1 in 3,802 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2020s
  • 15.0% of all girls named Rhea (2,965) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s117#430 (1889)#613
1890s476#360 (1893)#410
1900s542#385 (1901)#459
1910s1,352#430 (1911)#492
1920s1,567#515 (1920)#572
1930s1,092#602 (1931)#645
1940s1,137#674 (1941)#734
1950s1,248#826 (1953)#863
1960s1,055#970 (1963)#1,042
1970s990#1,014 (1978)#1,190
1980s1,244#1,005 (1983)#1,155
1990s1,174#1,258 (1993)#1,425
2000s2,042#908 (2004)#1,142
2010s2,736#703 (2019)#991
2020s2,965#527 (2023)#603

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rhea in 2006

girls
#1,167
208 births · 1 in 9,140 girls

Top girls' names in 2006

  1. #1Emily21,412
  2. #2Emma19,133
  3. #3Madison18,635
  4. #4Isabella18,231
  5. #5Ava16,941
  6. #6Abigail15,633
  7. #7Olivia15,508
  8. #8Hannah14,556
  9. #9Sophia13,503
  10. #10Samantha12,470
  11. #1,167Rhea208
More about 2006

girls

1,901,209 girls got a published name in 2006; 1 in 9,140 of them was named Rhea, which outranked 94.2% of the 20,064 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rhea
  1. #1,162Rachelle209
  2. #1,162Samaria209
  3. #1,162Samiyah209
  4. #1,167Rhea208
  5. #1,167Ananya208
  6. #1,167Caleigh208
  7. #1,167Lexus208
  8. #1,173Constance207
  9. #1,173Dallas207
  10. #1,173Gladys207

Tied with 5 names at #1,167; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2005
Risers
  1. ↑ 8,571Bethzy#9,452 → #881
  2. ↑ 1,747Rihanna#2,278 → #531
  3. ↑ 965Yaretzi#1,803 → #838
  4. ↑ 921Betsy#1,668 → #747
  5. ↑ 612Evangeline#1,210 → #598
Fallers
  1. ↓ 2,134Mikalah#806 → #2,940
  2. ↓ 1,275Jolette#954 → #2,229
  3. ↓ 756Karol#818 → #1,574
  4. ↓ 446Litzy#388 → #834
  5. ↓ 305Devon#963 → #1,268

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2006 →