Naseem
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #15,293 · #3,658 for boys in 2025, 30 births
Given to boys 83.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2000 · 99 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,291since 1979
Naseem over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,658 | 30 | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | #3,001 | 41 |
| 2023 | — | #3,566 | 32 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,533 | 32 | |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | #3,242 | 36 |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | #3,344 | 33 |
| 2019 | — | #4,114 | 25 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,994 | 39 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,249 | 35 | |
| 2016 | — | #4,943 | 19 | |
| 2015 | — | #4,890 | 19 | |
| 2014 | — | #4,392 | 22 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,405 | 31 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,772 | 43 | |
| 2011 | — | #3,695 | 28 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,812 | 27 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,274 | 34 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,946 | 40 | |
| 2007 | — | #3,135 | 36 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,310 | 54 | |
| 2005 | — | #2,803 | 38 | |
| 2004 | — | #2,164 | 54 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #2,006 | 57 |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #1,851 | 61 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #1,514 | 80 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #1,300 | 99 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #1,383 | 85 |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #1,642 | 63 |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #2,981 | 25 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #4,022 | 16 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | — | |
| 1992 | #7,067 | 12 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 | — | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | — | |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | — | |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Naseem! It came in at #5,355, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1981–1989, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Naseem is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Jersey#441 · 1 in 3,687
- Pennsylvania#445 · 1 in 4,110
- New York#698 · 1 in 6,739
- Virginia#776 · 1 in 8,207
- North Carolina#928 · 1 in 10,346
Best ever in a state: #398 in New Jersey, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #441 | 13 | 1 in 3,687 |
| Pennsylvania | #445 | 16 | 1 in 4,110 |
| New York | #698 | 17 | 1 in 6,739 |
| Virginia | #776 | 5 | 1 in 8,207 |
| North Carolina | #928 | 5 | 1 in 10,346 |
| Florida | #1,278 | 5 | 1 in 17,858 |
| California | #2,166 | 5 | 1 in 49,576 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Naseem
- 657 spots since 2024 (#3,001 → #3,658)
- 314 spots since 2020 (#3,344 → #3,658)
- 1,232 spots since 2015 (#4,890 → #3,658)
- Debuted 1979
- Peaked 2000 at #1,300 (99 births)
- Births halved by 2005, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 19,838 boys born in 2000 were named Naseem (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 56,936 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.8% of all boys named Naseem (553) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1995, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6 | #5,355 (1979) | #5,355 |
| 1980s | 12 | #4,940 (1980) | #6,105 |
| 1990s | 228 | #1,383 (1999) | #4,687 |
| 2000s | 553 | #1,300 (2000) | #2,330 |
| 2010s | 288 | #2,772 (2012) | #3,827 |
| 2020s | 204 | #3,001 (2024) | #3,391 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Naseem in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 181,604 of them was named Naseem, which outranked 48.1% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #8,534Zeena11
- #8,534Ziana11
- #8,534Zynia11
- #9,163Naseem10
- #9,163Aaliyha10
- #9,163Aashna10
- #9,163Aastha10
- #9,874Aailyah9
- #9,874Aalia9
- #9,874Aaminah9
Tied with 710 names at #9,163; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 19,838 of them was named Naseem, which outranked 89.3% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,290Tyrus100
- #1,290Wallace100
- #1,290Yash100
- #1,300Naseem99
- #1,300Arian99
- #1,300Armon99
- #1,300Claude99
- #1,314Braylon98
- #1,314Cason98
- #1,314Devion98
Tied with 13 names at #1,300; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.